Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion

References

• Agranov M, Bisin A, Schotter A (2014) An experimental study of the impact of competition for other people’s money: The portfolio manager market. Experiment. Econom. 17(4):564–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albrecht K, Volz KG, Sutter M, Laibson DI, von Cramon DY (2011) What is for me is not for you: Brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other. Soc. Cognitive Affective Neuroscience 6(2):218–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson O, Holm HJ, Tyran J-R, Wengström E (2013a) Risking other people’s money: Experimental evidence on bonus schemes, competition, and altruism. Working Paper 989, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Andersson O, Tyran J-R, Wengström E, Holm HJ (2013b) Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Fact or fiction? Working Paper Series 964, Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Camerer CF, Loewenstein G (2005) Adam Smith, behavioral economist. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(3):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battalio RC, Kagel JC, Jiranyakul K (1990) Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. J. Risk Uncertainty 3(1):25–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binswanger HP (1980) Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 62(3):395–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Ockenfels A (2010) Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):628–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booij A, van Praag BMS, van de Kuilen G (2010) A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. Theory Decision 68(12):115–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2005) Three cheers–psychological, theoretical, empirical–for loss aversion. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):129–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York city cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarty S, Harrison G, Haruvy EE, Rutström E (2011) Are you risk averse over other peoples’ money? Southern Econom. J. 77(4):901–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2012) Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):50–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Jackson MO (2009) The role of social responsibility in strategic risk-taking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 69(3):241–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U, Imas A (2013) Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 87:43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York city cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daruvala D (2007) Gender, risk and stereotypes. J. Risk Uncertainty 35(3):265–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dave C, Eckel C, Johnson C, Rojas C (2010) Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? J. Risk Uncertainty 41(3):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2010) Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1238–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksen KW, Kvaløy O (2010) Myopic investment management. Rev. Finance 14(3):521–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L (2007) Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):298–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Naef M, Schmidt K (2006) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1912–1917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr-Duda H, Epper T (2012) Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probability-dependent risk preferences. Annual Rev. Econom. 4(1):567–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1233–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Potters J (1997) An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):631–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Amer. Psychologist 58(9):697–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kvaløy O, Luzuriaga M (2013) Playing the trust game with other people’s money. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Lefebvre M, Vieider F (2014) Risk taking of executives under different incentive contracts: Experimental evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 97:27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2004) Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior. Mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Weber E, Hsee C, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. 127(2):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montinari N, Rancan M (2013) Social preferences under risk: The role of social distance. Jena Economic Research Paper 2013-050, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahlke J, Strasser S, Vieider F (2010) Responsibility effects in decision making under risk. Munich Discussion Paper 2010-37, Department of Economics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Pahlke J, Strasser S, Vieider F (2012) Risk-taking for others under accountability. Econom. Lett. 114(1):102–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollmann MMH, Potters J, Trautmann ST (2014) Risk taking by agents: The role of ex-ante and ex-post accountability. Econom. Lett. 123(3):387–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds DB, Joseph J, Sherwood R (2009) Risky shift versus cautious shift: Determining differences in risk taking between private and public management decision-making. J. Bus. Econom. Res. 7(1):63–78.Google Scholar
• Rustichini A (2008) Dual or unitary system? Two alternative models of decision making. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 8(4):355–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sokol-Hessner P, Camerer CF, Phelps EA (2013) Emotion regulation reduces loss aversion and decreases Amygdala responses to losses. Soc. Cognitive Affective Neuroscience 8(3):341–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sokol-Hessner P, Hsu M, Curley NG, Delgado MR, Camerer CF, Phelps EA (2009) Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals’ loss aversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(13):5035–5040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephens TA, Tyran J-R (2012) “At least I didn’t lose money.” Nominal loss aversion shapes evaluations of housing transactions. Discussion Paper 12-14, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Sutter M (2009) Individual behavior and group membership: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2247–2257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thöni C, Tyran J-R, Wengström E (2012) Microfoundations of social capital. J. Public Econom. 96(7–8):635–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieider F, Villegas-Palacio C, Martinsson P, Mejia M (2014) Risk taking for oneself and others: A structural model approach. Working paper, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin.Google Scholar
• von Gaudecker H-M, van Soest A, Wengström E (2011) Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):664–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Gaudecker H-M, van Soest A, Wengström E (2012) Experts in experiments: How selection matters for estimated distributions of risk preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 45(2):159–190.Crossref, Google Scholar