The Benefits of Relationship Lending in a Cross-Country Context: A Meta-Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2088

References

  • Acharya V, Saunders A, Hasan I (2006) Should banks be diversified? Evidence from individual bank loan portfolios. J. Bus. 79:1355–1412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal S, Ben-David I (2013) Do loan officers’ incentives lead to lax lending standards? Working Paper 2012-03-007, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  • Agarwal S, Chomsisengphet S, Liu C, Souleles N (2009) Benefits of relationship banking: Evidence from consumer credit markets. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  • Agarwal S, Hauswald R (2009) The choice between arm’s-length and inside debt. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Agarwal S, Hauswald R (2010) Distance and private information in lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:2757–2788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen F, Gale D (2000) Comparing Financial Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2005) Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? J. Finance 60:137–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger A, Udell G (1995) Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. J. Bus. 68:351–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger A, Udell G (2006) A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. J. Banking Finance 30:2945–2966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berlin M, Mester L (1999) Deposits and relationship lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 12:579–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharath S, Dahiya S, Saunders A, Srinivasan A (2011) Lending relationships and loan contract terms. Rev. Financial Stud. 24:1141–1203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bijmolt T, Pieters R (2001) Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Marketing Lett. 12:157–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black S, Strahan P (2002) Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. J. Finance 57:2807–2833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boot A (2000) Relationship banking: What do we know? J. Financial Intermediation 9:7–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boot A, Thakor A (2000) Can relationship banking survive competition? J. Finance 55:679–713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brick I, Palia D (2007) Evidence of jointness in the terms of relationship lending. J. Financial Intermediation 16:452–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Kluve J, Weber A (2010) Active labour market policy evaluations: A meta-analysis. Econom. J. 120:452–477.Google Scholar
  • Cooper H, Hedges L, Valentine J (2009) The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2nd ed. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Degryse H, Ongena S (2005) Distance, lending relationships, and competition. J. Finance 60:231–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Degryse H, Ongena S (2008) Competition and regulation in the banking sector: A review of the empirical evidence on the sources of bank rents. Thakor A, Boot A, eds. Handbook of Financial Intermediation and Banking (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 483–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis S, Nandy D, Sharpe I (2000) The determinants of contract terms in bank revolving credit agreements. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 35:87–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edgington E (1972) A normal curve method for combining probability values from independent experiments. J. Psych. 82:85–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsas R (2005) Empirical determinants of relationship lending. J. Financial Intermediation 14:32–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elyasiani E, Goldberg L (2004) Relationship lending: A survey of the literature. J. Econom. Bus. 56:315–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hedges L, Olkin I (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
  • Hedges L, Tipton E, Johnson M (2010) Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Res. Synthesis Methods 1:39–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ioannidou V, Ongena S (2010) “Time for a change”: Loan conditions and bank behavior when firms switch banks. J. Finance 65:1847–1877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirschenmann K, Norden L (2012) The relationship between borrower risk and loan maturity in small business lending. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 39:730–757.Google Scholar
  • Koetse M, de Groot H, Florax R (2009) A meta-analysis of the investment-uncertainty relationship. Southern Econom. J. 76:283–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krahnen J, Schmidt R (2004) The German Financial System (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106:1113–1155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 15:222–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipsey M, Wilson D (2001) Practical Meta-Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Norden L, Weber M (2010) Credit line usage, checking account activity, and default risk of bank borrowers. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:3665–3699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen M, Rajan R (1994) The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. J. Finance 49:3–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen M, Rajan R (1995) The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quart. J. Econom. 110:406–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Presbitero A, Zazzaro A (2011) Competition and relationship lending: Friends or foes? J. Financial Intermediation 20:387–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Standard & Poor’s (2006) A Guide to the loan market. Report, Standard & Poors, New York. https://www.lcdcomps.com/d/pdf/LoanMarketguide.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Stanley T (2001) Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. J. Econom. Perspect. 15:131–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.