Gaining Access by Doing Good: The Effect of Sociopolitical Reputation on Firm Participation in Public Policy Making

References

• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American National Elections Studies (2012) American National Elections Studies 2012 Time Series Study [data set]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers].Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, de Figueiredo JM, Snyder JM (2003) Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austen-Smith D, Wright JR (1994) Counteractive lobbying. Amer. J. Political Sci. 38(1):25–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management J. 43(4):717–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1999) Integrated market and nonmarket strategies in client and interest group politics. Bus. Politics 1(1):7–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP, Diermeier D (2007) Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):599–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of the transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(2):297–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Berry JM, Hojnacki M, Kimball DC, Leech B (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry JM (1997) The Interest Group Society, 3rd ed. (Longman, New York).Google Scholar
• Bermiss YS, Zajac EJ, King BG (2014) Under construction: How commensuration and management fashion affect corporate reputation rankings. Organ. Sci. 25(2):591–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2011) Votes or money? Theory and evidence from the U.S. Congress. J. Public Econom. 95(7):587–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi J-P, Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonica A (2014) Avenues of influence: On the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives. Working paper, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Borisov A, Goldman E, Gupta N (2014) The corporate value of (corrupt) lobbying. Working paper, Department of Finance, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A (2005) Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 61(1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Chin MK, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1786–1809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown B, Perry S (1994) Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's “most admired” companies. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1347–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burris V (2005) Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):249–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burstein P, Hirsch CE (2007) Interest organizations, information, and policy innovation in the U.S. Congress. Sociol. Forum 22(2):174–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW (2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):125–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin ML, Bond JR, Geva N (2000) A foot in the door: An experimental study of PAC and constituency effects on access. J. Politics 62(2):534–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives' values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu S, Sharfman M (2011) Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. J. Management 37(6):1558–1585.Google Scholar
• Cook DO, Kieschnick R, Van Ness RA (2006) On the marketing of IPOs. J. Financial Econom. 82(1):35–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs JE, Gilley KM (2005) Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management J. 26(9):827–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper MJ, Gulen H, Ovtchinnikov AV (2010) Corporate political contributions and stock returns. J. Finance 65(2):687–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Carter SM (2005) An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. J. Management Stud. 42(2):329–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Suchman MC (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 49–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGregorio C (1992) Leadership approaches in Congressional committee hearings. Western Political Quart. 45(4):971–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. Zucker LG, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 3–21.Google Scholar
• Dollinger MJ, Golden PA, Saxton T (1997) The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture. Strategic Management J. 18(2):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreiling MC (2000) The class embeddedness of corporate political action: Leadership in defense of the NAFTA. Soc. Problems 47(1):21–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreiling MC, Darves D (2011) Corporate unity in American trade policy: A network analysis of corporate-dyad political action. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(5):1514–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Fremeth A, Richter BK, Schaufele B (2013) Campaign contributions over CEOs' careers. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 5(3):170–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardberg NA, Fombrun CJ (2006) Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):329–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 30(4):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grier KB, Munger MC (1986) The impact of legislator attributes on interest group campaign contributions. J. Labor Res. 7(4):349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grier KB, Munger MC, Roberts BE (1994) The determinants of industry political activity, 1978–1986. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 88(4):911–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin JJ, Mahon JF (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36(1):5–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Schuler DA (2013) In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial return on corporate political investments. Strategic Management J. 34(2):165–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RL, Deardorff AV (2006) Lobbying as legislative subsidy. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 100(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RL, Wayman FW (1990) Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 84(3):797–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen JM (1991) Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Heinz JP, Lauman EO, Nelson RL, Salisbury RH (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ (1999) Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management J. 42(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hojnacki M, Kimball DC (2001) PAC contributions and lobbying contacts on congressional committees. Political Res. Quart. 54(1):161–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs D (1988) Corporate economic power and the state: A longitudinal assessment of two explanations. Amer. J. Sociol. 93(4):852–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve HR, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: Legitimacy loss by innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kersh R (2007) The well-informed lobbyist: Information and interest group lobbying. Cigler AJ, Loomis BL, eds. Interest Group Politics, 7th ed. (CQ Press, Washington, DC), 389–411.Google Scholar
• King DC (1994) The nature of congressional committee jurisdictions. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 88(1):48–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, McDonnell M-H (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Walker E (2014) Winning hearts and minds: Field theory and the three dimensions of strategy. Strategic Organ. 12(2):134–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krehbiel K (1992) Information and Legislative Organization (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
• Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political–Economic Systems (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE (1982) The market as prison. J. Politics 44(2):324–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord MD (2003) Constituency building as the foundation for corporate political strategy. Acad. Management Executive 17(1):112–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey A, Mackey TB, Barney JB (2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):817–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2009) The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. 20(6):1034–1052.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattingly JE, Berman SL (2006) Measurment of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Bus. Soc. 45(1):20–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayhew DR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, King BG (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputation threat and prosocial responses to social movement boycotts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):387–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills CW (1956) The Power Elite (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS (2013) The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan SL, Winship C (2007) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullahy J (1997) Instrumental-variable estimation of count data models: Applications to models of cigarette smoking behavior. Rev. Econom. Statist. 79(4):586–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1997) Privacy and self-regulation in the information age. Report, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/report/1997/privacy-and-self-regulation-information-age.Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver CY (1988) The collective strategy framework: An application to competing predictions of isomorphism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(4):543–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver CY (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver CY, Holzinger I (2008) The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):496–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24(3):403–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ornstein NJ, Mann TE, Malbin MJ, Rugg A (2013) Vital Statistics on Congress (Brookings Institution and American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Ovtchinnikov AV, Pantaleoni E (2012) Individual political contributions and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 105(2):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependent Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Polanyi K (1957) The economy as instituted process. Polanyi K, Arensbert CM, Pearson HW, eds. Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory (Free Press, New York), 243–269.Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “Red Scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pozner J-E (2008) Stigma and settling up: An integrated approach to the consequences of organizational misconduct for organizational elites. J. Bus. Ethics 80(1):141–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimization, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richter BK, Werner T (2014) Campaign contributions from corporate executives in lieu of political action committees. Working paper, Department of Business, Government and Society, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Pollock TG, Hayward MLA (2006) Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):50–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1077–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts BE, Shaw D, Huang T, Baek M (2014) Money that matters: The role of money in campaigns and elections. Working paper, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
• Schuler DA, Rehbein KA, Cramer R (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4):659–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Seidman GW (2007) Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Sharma LL, Teret SP, Brownell KD (2010) The food industry and self-regulation: Standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Amer. J. Public Health 100(2):240–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith MA (2000) American Business and Political Power Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soule S (2009) Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szwajkowski E, Figlewicz RE (1999) Evaluating corporate performance: A comparison of the Fortune reputation survey and the Socrates social rating database. J. Managerial Issues 11(2):137–154.Google Scholar
• Udayasankar K (2008) Corporate social responsibility and firm size. J. Bus. Ethics 83(2):167–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasi IB, King BG (2012) Social movements, risk perceptions, and economic outcomes: The effect of primary and secondary stakeholder activism on firms' perceived environmental risk and financial performance. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(4):573–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddock SA (2004) Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Bus. Soc. Rev. 109(1):5–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker ET, Rea CM (2014) The political mobilization of firms and industries. Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:281–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):281–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Rao H, Thomas LG (2009) From streets to suites: How the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weigelt K, Camerer C (1988) Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management J. 9(5):443–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werner T (2012) Public Forces and Private Politics in American Big Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson GK (1990) Corporate political strategies. British J. Political Sci. 20(2):281–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wong EM, Ormiston ME, Tetlock PE (2011) The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1207–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright JR (1990) Contributions, lobbying, and committee voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 84(2):417–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright JR (1996) Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence (Allyn and Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar