Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products

References

• Agrawal V, Ferguson M, Souza G (2009) Trade-in rebates for price discrimination and product recovery. Working paper, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Allenby G, Arora N, Ginter J (1998) On the heterogeneity of demand. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):384–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alter A, Oppenheimer D, Zemla J (2010) Missing the trees for the forest: A construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):436–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Guide V, Van Wassenhove L (2008a) Product reuse economics in closed-loop supply chain research. Production Oper. Management 17(5):483–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove L (2008b) Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Sci. 54(10):1731–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Draganska M, Simonson I (2007) The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Sci. 26(4):460–472.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng R (2009) Cisco ignores sizable market for used networking gear. Wall Street Journal (August 4).Google Scholar
• Chiou L, Tucker C (2012) How does the use of trademarks by third-party sellers affect online search? Marketing Sci. 31(5):819–837.Link, Google Scholar
• Debo L, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove L (2005) Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51(8):1193–1205.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11-part-2):S19–S34.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding M (2007) An incentive-aligned mechanism for conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):214–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Grewal R, Liechty J (2005) Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Bhaskaran S (2012) Consumer mental accounts and implications to selling base products and add-ons. Marketing Sci. 31(5):801–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Eriksson K, Simpson B (2010) Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery. Judgment Decision Making 5(3):159–163.Google Scholar
• Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2006) The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production Oper. Management 15(3):351–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrer G, Swaminathan J (2006) Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Sci. 52(1):15–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Green P, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide D, Li J (2010) The potential for cannibalization of new product sales by remanufactured products. Decision Sci. 41(3):547–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide D, Van Wassenhove L (2001) Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 10(2):142–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide D, Van Wassenhove L (2009) The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1):10–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Guide V, Muyldermans L, Van Wassenhove L (2005) Hewlett-Packard company unlocks the value potential from time-sensitive returns. Interfaces 35(4):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Hellofs L, Jacobson R (1999) Market share and customers' perceptions of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? J. Marketing 63(1):16–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlett-Packard (2014) Ink and toner cartridges. Accessed November 24, 2014, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/ads/supplies/overview.html.Google Scholar
• John D, Loken B, Joiner C (1998) The negative impact of extensions: Can flagship products be diluted? J. Marketing 62(1):19–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim C, Lavack A, Smith M (2001) Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands. J. Bus. Res. 52(3):211–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirmani A, Rao A (2000) No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing 64(2):66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Mahajan V (1991) A reservation-price model for optimal pricing of multi-attribute products in conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 28(3):347–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loken B, John D (1993) Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? J. Marketing 57(3):71–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenna F (1984) Assimilation and contrast in perceptual judgments. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 36(3):531–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller K, Hofstetter R, Krohmer H, Zhang Z (2011) How should we measure consumers' willingness to pay? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):172–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T (2003) Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psych. Rev. 110(3):472–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T (2007) Assimilation and contrast as comparison effects: A selective accessibility model. Stapel DA, Suls J, eds. Assimilation and Contrast in Social Psychology (Psychology Press, New York), 165–185.Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ovchinnikov A (2011) Revenue and cost management for remanufactured products. Production Oper. Management 20(6):824–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis P (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L (2012) Organizational structure and the limits of knowledge exploitation: Evidence from consumer automobile leasing. Management Sci. 58(6):1106–1121.Link, Google Scholar
• Preacher K, Hayes A (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D, Srivastava J (2001) Effect of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgments of product quality: A cue diagnosticity framework. J. Consumer Psych. 10(3):123–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall T, Ulrich K, Reibstein D (1998) Brand equity and vertical product line extent. Marketing Sci. 17(4):356–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software (2009) The CBC/HB System for Hierarchical Bayes Estimation Version 5.0 Technical Paper. Technical report, Sawtooth Software Inc. Accessed January 28, 2013, http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/hbtech.pdf.Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Taub D, Hovland C (1958) Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. J. Experiment. Psych. 55(2):150–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souza G (2013) Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review, and future research. Decision Sci. 44(1):7–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Key drivers in the market for remanufactured products: Empirical evidence from eBay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):315–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Ülkü S, Dimofte C, Schmidt G (2012) Consumer valuation of modularly upgradeable products. Management Sci. 58(9):1761–1776.Link, Google Scholar
• U.S. International Trade Commission (2012) Remanufactured goods: An overview of the U.S. and global industries, markets and trade. Technical report, USITC Publication 4356, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Waldman M (2003) Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar