Cleaning House: The Impact of Information Technology Monitoring on Employee Theft and Productivity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2103

References

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 267–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine D (1997) Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota Production System: A case study of NUMMI’s 1993 model introduction. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 50:416–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2012) Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23:849–867.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Stern S (2002) The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. RAND J. Econom. 33:399–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21:1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker GP, Hubbard TN (2003) Make versus buy in trucking: Asset ownership, job design, and information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93:551–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R, Lee S, Potter G, Srinivasan D (2001) An empirical analysis of continuing improvements following the implementation of a performance-based compensation plan. J. Accounting Econom. 30:315–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barankay I (2014) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bazerman M, Loewenstein G, Moore D (2002) Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80:96–103.Google Scholar
  • Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76:169–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96:1652–1678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2011) Identity, morals, and choices. Quart. J. Econom. 126:805–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein E (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57:181–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein S, Sheen A (2014) The operational consequences of private equity buyouts: Evidence from the restaurant industry. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust difference-in-differences? Quart. J. Econom. 119:249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: U.S. multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102:167–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bodvarsson O, Luksetich W, McDermott S (2003) Why do diners tip: Rule-of-thumb or valuation of service? Appl. Econom. 35:1659–1665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117:339–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Comm. ACM 36:66–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42:541–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Campbell D (2012) Employee selection as a control system. J. Accounting Res. 50:931–966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charron S, Koechlin E (2010) Divided representation of concurrent goals in the human frontal lobes. Science 328:360–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Sandino T (2012) Can wages buy honesty? The relationship between relative wages and employee theft. J. Accounting Res. 50:967–1000.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini R (1996) The triple tumor structure of organizational behavior. Messic DM, Tenbrunsel AE, eds. Codes of Conduct (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 44–58.Google Scholar
  • Clark JR, Huckman RS (2012) Broadening focus: Spillovers, complementarities, and specialization in the hospital industry. Management Sci. 58:708–722.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2010) Sell-side school ties. J. Finance 65:1409–1437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dal Bó E, Terviö M (2013) Self-esteem, moral capital, and wrongdoing. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11:599–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeHoratius N, Raman A (2007) Store manager incentive design and retail performance: An exploratory investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9:518–534.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeHoratius N, Raman A (2008) Inventory record inaccuracy: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 54:627–641.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, La Ferrara E (2010) Detecting illegal arms trade. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 2:26–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deming WE (1938) Statistical Adjustment of Data (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Deming WE (1993) The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Detert JR, Trevino LK, Burris ER, Andiappan M (2007) Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. J. Appl. Psych. 92:993–1005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickens W, Katz L, Lang K, Summers L (1989) Employee crime and the monitoring puzzle. J. Labor Econom. 7:331–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Draca M, Machin S, Witt R (2011) Panic on the streets of London: Police, crime, and the July 2005 terror attacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:2157–2181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan S (2012) Incentives work: Getting teachers to come to school. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102:1241–1278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisman R, Miguel E (2007) Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. J. Political Econom. 115:1020–1048.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisman R, Wei SJ (2004) Tax rates and tax evasion: Evidence from “missing imports” in China. J. Political Econom. 112:471–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisman R, Wei SJ (2009) The smuggling of art, and the art of smuggling: Uncovering the illicit trade in cultural property and antiques. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 1:82–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Francis P, DeGlinkta RC (2004) How to Burn Down the House: The Infamous Waiter and Bartender’s Scam Bible by Two Bourbon Street Waiters (Promethean Books, New Orleans, LA).Google Scholar
  • French JRP (1950) Field experiments: Changing group productivity. Miller JG, ed. Experiments in Social Process: A Symposium on Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York), 79–96.Google Scholar
  • Frey B (1993) Does monitoring increase work effort? The rivalry with trust and loyalty. Econom. Inquiry 31:663–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2009) Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psych. Sci. 20:1153–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2010a) Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. J. Bus. Ethics 95:89–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2010b) Robin Hood under the hood: Wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organ. Sci. 21:1176–1194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pisano G (2008) Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10:676–691.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J (1990) Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psych. 75:561–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111:465–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heron RA, Lie E (2007) Does backdating explain the stock price pattern around executive stock option grants? J. Financial Econom. 83:271–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochschild AR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Hölmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 7:24–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holweg M (2007) The genealogy of lean production. Production Oper. Management 25:420–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TN (2000) The demand for monitoring technologies: The case of trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 115:533–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jin G, Leslie P (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118:409–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin G, Leslie P (2009) Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 1:237–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS (2014) Does multitasking improve performance? Evidence from the emergency department. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16:168–183.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS, Terwiesch C (2009) Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Sci. 55(9):1486–1498.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS, Terwiesch C (2012) An econometric analysis of patient flows in the cardiac intensive care unit. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14:50–65.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33:1194–1214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latham G (2001) The importance of understanding and changing employee outcome expectancies for gaining commitment to an organizational goal. Personnel Psych. 54:707–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (1986) Salaries and piece-rates. J. Bus. 59:405–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90:1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E, Oyer P (2011) Personnel economics: Hiring and incentives. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4B (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1769–1823.Google Scholar
  • Litzky BE, Eddleston KA, Kidder DL (2006) The good, the bad, and the misguided: How managers inadvertently encourage deviant behaviors. Acad. Management Perspect. 20:91–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lochner L (2007) Individual perceptions of the criminal justice system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97:444–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. 45:633–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazar N, Ariely D (2006) Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. J. Public Policy and Marketing 4:117–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mead N, Baumeister R, Gino F, Schweitzer M, Ariely D (2009) Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45:594–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore C, Detert J, Trevino L, Baker V, Mayer D (2012) Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psych. 65:1–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy K (1993) Honesty in the Workplace (Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Nagin D, Rebitzer J, Sanders S, Taylor L (2002) Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94:950–873.Google Scholar
  • Netessine S, Yakubovich V (2012) The Darwinian workplace. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90:25–28.Google Scholar
  • Niehaus P, Sukhtankar S (2013) Corruption dynamics: The golden goose effect. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 5:230–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niehoff B, Moorman R (1993) Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship. Acad. Management J. 36:527–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olken BA (2007) Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J. Political Econom. 115:200–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olken BA, Barron P (2009) The simple economics of extortion: Evidence from trucking in Aceh. J. Political Econom. 117:417–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ones D, Viswesvaran C, Schmidt F (1993) Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 78:679–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snyder JA (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54:1891–1903.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snyder JA (2012) Discretion and manipulation by experts: Evidence from a vehicle emissions policy change. BE J. Econom. Anal. Policy 12(3) Article 1. DOI: 10.1515/1935-1682.3246.Google Scholar
  • Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2013) Information technology, productivity and asset ownership: Evidence from taxicab fleets. Organ. Sci. 24:832–845.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roy D (1952) Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop. Amer. J. Sociol. 57:427–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz KL, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (2003) Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility. J. Oper. Management 21:81–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spear S, Bowen H (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77:96–108.Google Scholar
  • Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6):1141–1159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sweeney D, Steinhauser S (2010) Restaurant Industry Operations Report (National Restaurant Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Tan TF, Netessine S (2014) When does the devil make work? An empirical study of the impact of workload on worker productivity. Management Sci. 60:1574–1593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tenbrunsel AE, Smith-Crowe K (2008) Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Management Ann. 2:545–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker A, Edmondson A (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif. Management Rev. 45:55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Victor B, Trevino L, Shapiro D (1993) Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. J. Bus. Ethics 12:253–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang D (2008a) Integrity for hire: An analysis of widespread customs reform. J. Law Econom. 51:25–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang D (2008b) Can enforcement backfire? Crime displacement in the context of customs reform in the Philippines. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90:1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zitzewitz E (2006) Nationalism in winter sports judging and its lessons for organizational decision making. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15:67–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zitzewitz E (2012) Forensic economics. J. Econom. Literature 50:731–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zitzewitz E (2014) Does transparency reduce favoritism and corruption? Evidence from the reform of figure skating judging. J. Sports Econom. 15:3–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.