Colocation Still Matters: Conformance Quality and the Interdependence of R&D and Manufacturing in the Pharmaceutical Industry

References

• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2012) Matching on the estimated propensity score. NBER Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Adler PS (1995) Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. 6(2):147–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Goldfarb A (2008) Restructuring research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1578–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Anand G, Gray JV, Siemsen E (2012) Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1700–1716.Link, Google Scholar
• Angeles G, Guilkey D, Mroz TA (2005) The impact of community-level variables on individual-level outcomes: Theoretical results and applications. Sociol. Methods Res. 34:76–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antràs P (2005) Property rights and the international organization of production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8/9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball G, Siemsen E, Shah R (2015) Inspector experience and product recalls in the medical device industry. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2014) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Management Sci. 60(12):2859–2885.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Foster L, Jarmin R, Saporta-Eksten I, Van Reenen J (2013) Management in America. Discussion Paper CES 13-01, Center for Economic Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Bohn RE (2005) From art to science in manufacturing: The evolution of technological knowledge. Foundations Trends in Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 1(2):1–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohn RE, Terwiesch C (1999) The economics of yield-driven processes. J. Oper. Management 18(1):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Greenstein S (1996) Technical progress and co-invention in computing and in the uses of computers. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity, Microeconomics 1–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cairncross F (2001) The Death of Distance, rev. ed. (Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran A, Linderman K, Schroeder RG (2012) Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high-technology organizations. J. Oper. Management 30(1–2):134–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung KH, Pruitt SW (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. FM: J. Financial Management Assoc. 23(3):70–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM (2008) Pharmaceuticals. Macher JT, Mowery DC, eds. Innovation in Global Industries: U.S. Firms Competing in a New World (National Academies Press, Washington), 207–230.Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Datar SC, Jordan S, Kekre S, Srinivasan RK (1997) New product development structures and time-to-market. Management Sci. 43(4):452–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Dean JW, Susman GI (1989) Organizing for manufacturable design. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(1):28–36.Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Levin SG, Stephan PE, Wrinkler AE (2010) The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Sci. 56(9):1439–1461.Link, Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD, Chitkara AR (2006) The new practice of global product development. Sloan Management Rev. 47(4):22–30.Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE (1995) Product-process development integration in manufacturing. Management Sci. 41(7):1224–1237.Link, Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE, Stoll HW (1990) Managing the Design-Manufacturing Process (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Fifarek BJ, Veloso FM, Davidson CI (2008) Offshoring technology innovation: A case study of rare-earth technology. J. Oper. Management 26(2):222–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1995) The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decision Sci. 26(5):659–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, van Zeebroeck N (2012) From wires to partners: How the Internet has fostered R&D collaborations within firms. Management Sci. 58(8):1549–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2002) Digital dispersion: An industrial and geographic census of commercial internet use. NBER Working Paper 9287, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 223–262.Google Scholar
• Fuchs E (2014) Global manufacturing and the future of technology. Science 345(6196):519–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs E, Kirchain R (2010) Design for location? The impact of manufacturing offshore on technology competitiveness in the optoelectronics industry. Management Sci. 56(12):2323–2349.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J (1977) Organizational Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gittell J (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.Link, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Goyal M, Netessine S, Reindorp M (2013) The impact of new product introduction on plant productivity in the North American automotive industry. Management Sci. 59(10):2217–2236.Link, Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Massimino B (2014) The effect of language differences and national culture on operational process compliance. Production Oper. Management 23(6):1042–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Anand G, Roth AV (2015) The influence of ISO 9000 certification on process compliance. Production Oper. Management 24(3):369–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Roth AV, Leiblein M (2011) Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. J. Oper. Management 29(7–8):737–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta E, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28(4):1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Hagerty JR (2014) Skilled worker supplier fuels U.S. manufacturing revival. Wall Street Journal (May 13), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303851804579560014176690166?mg=reno64-wsj.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Crozier LM (1985) Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth. J. Bus. Venturing 1(1):31–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 179–195.Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1996) Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2001) The long-run stock price performance of firms with effective TQM programs. Management Sci. 47(3):359–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS (2009) Are you having trouble keeping your operations focused? Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(9):91–95.Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Tempelaar MP, van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2009) Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):797–811.Link, Google Scholar
• Juran JM (1992) Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality Into Goods and Services (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kaynak H (2003) The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J. Oper. Management 21(4):405–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Ali-Yrkkö J (2009) Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: Postindustrial myth or economic reality? Rev. Policy Res. 26(1–2):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Cummings J (2002) What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? Hinds P, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 57–80.Google Scholar
• Kim EH, Morse A, Zingales L (2009) Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? J. Financial Econom. 93(3):353–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Nielson R, Coberley C, Pope JE, Wells A (2011) Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT (2006) Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 52(6):826–843.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Mayo JW, Nickerson JA (2011) Regulator heterogeneity and endogenous efforts to close the information asymmetry gap. J. Law Econom. 54(1):25–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair A (2006) Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance—Implications for quality management theory development. J. Oper. Management 24(6):948–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, von Krogh G (2009) Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20(3):635–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Nussbaum A (2011) J&J sees “significant costs” in 2011 to fix recalls. Bloomberg Business (January 25). Accessed June 20, 2013, Bloomberg.com. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-25/j-j-profit-declines-12-on-product-recalls-2011-outlook-trails-forecast.Google Scholar
• Pennings J (1975) The relevance of the structural-contingency model for organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(3):393–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1994) Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. 15(8):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1997) The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pisano GP, Shih WC (2009) Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(7/8):114–125.Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(6):77–90.Google Scholar
• Ray G, Ling X, Barney J (2013) Impact of information technology capital on firm scope and performance: The role of asset characteristics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1125–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds EB (2010) Institutions, public policy and the product life cycle: The globalization of biomanufacturing and implications for Massachusetts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.Google Scholar
• Sirkin HL, Zinser M, Hohner D, Rose J (2012) U.S. manufacturing nears the tipping point. Boston Consulting Group (March 22), https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/manufacturing_supply_chain_management_us_manufacturing_nears_the_tipping_point/.Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Pich M, McKendrick DG, Stout SK (2002) Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: An empirical study in the telecommunications industry. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 49(1):45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Squire B, Brown S, Readman J, Bessant J (2006) The impact of mass customization on manufacturing trade-offs. Production Oper. Management 15(1):10–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR (2012) Unpacking team familiarity: The effects of geographic location and hierarchical role. Production Oper. Management 21(3):619–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter Special Issue):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt M, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1977) Time-cost tradeoffs: Elasticity estimates and determinants of international technology transfer projects. Management Sci. 23(8):830–837.Link, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Bohn RE (2001) Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up. Internat. J. Production Econom. 70(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Ton Z, Huckman RS (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):56–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Tyre M, von Hippel E (1997) The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 8(1):71–83.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects or R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11):S1–S18.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Delbecq HA, Koenig LR Jr (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Ganco M, Hinings CR (2013) Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):391–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Alexander EA, Jones SL (2015) Institutional logics and interorganizational learning in technological arenas: Evidence from standard-setting organizations in the mobile handset industry. Organ. Sci. 26(3):830–846.Link, Google Scholar
• Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quart. J. Econom. 80(2):190–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu LX (2008) Pharmaceutical quality by design: Product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharmaceutical Res. 25(4):781–791.Crossref, Google Scholar