How Point-of-Sale Marketing Mix Impacts National-Brand Purchase Shares
Published Online:7 May 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2113
References
- (2006) Promotion profitability for a retailer: The role of promotion, brand, category, and store characteristics. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):518–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Building brands. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1036–1054.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Long-term effect of marketing strategy on brand sales. Marketing Sci. 47(5):866–882.Google Scholar
- (1999) Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. 18(2):137–153.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Slotting allowances and fees: Schools of thought and the views of practicing managers. J. Marketing 64(2):92–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(3):50–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. 24(4):616–622.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) Order of entry as a moderator of the effect of the marketing mix on market share. Marketing Sci. 15(3):222–242.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):176–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Consumers' perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Sci. 23(4):500–518.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Sci. 15(4):379–394.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Consumer packaged goods in the united states: National brands, local branding. J. Marketing Res. 44(1):4–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Brand history, geography, and the persistence of brand shares. J. Political Econom. 117(1):87–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Endogenous sunk costs and the geographic differences in the market structures of CPG categories. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The evolution of brand preferences: Evidence from consumer migration. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2472–2508.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 4(4):745–748.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Structural demand estimation with varying product availability. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1126–1131.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):228–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The anti-competitive effects and antitrust implications of category management and category captains of consumer products. Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 79(3):1313–1356.Google Scholar
- (2009) Does in-store marketing work? Effects on the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J. Marketing 73(6):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Why don’t prices rise during periods of peak demand? Evidence from scanner data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):15–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Empirical generalizations about market evolution and stationarity. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G109–G121.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Why store brand penetration varies by retailer. Marketing Sci. 16(3):208–227.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Shelf management and space elasticity. J. Retailing 70(4):301–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Food Marketing Institute (2001) Slotting allowances in the supermarket industry. Report, Food Marketing Institute, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- (2000) Determinants and outcomes of plan objectivity and implementation in category management relationships. J. Retailing 76(4):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) An empirical analysis of assortment similarities across U.S. supermarkets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):858–879.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Manufacturer-retailer channel interactions and implications for channel power: An empirical investigation of pricing in a local market. Marketing Sci. 19(2):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Six trade promotion tips: Why less can be more. Accessed April 18, 2012, http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/six-trade-promotion-tips-why-less-can-be-more/.Google Scholar
- (1997) How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management J. 18(S1):15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Focal supplier opportunism in supermarket retailer category management. J. Oper. Management 25(2):512–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Who benefits from store brand entry. Marketing Sci. 23(3):364–390.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Market share and distribution: A generalization, a speculation, and some implications. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G190–G202.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) The short- and long-term impact of an assortment reduction on category sales. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):536–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Competitive consequences of using a category captain. Management Sci. 56(10):1739–1765.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Do slotting allowances enhance efficiency or hinder competition. J. Marketing Res. 43(2):137–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Sunk Costs and Market Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2007) Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):625–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) More evidence on the performance of merger simulations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):51–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) The role of slotting fees and introductory allowances in retail buyers' new-product acceptance decisions. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 28(2):291–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Brand-level effects of stockkeeping unit reductions. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):545–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Local competition, entry, and agglomeration. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(2):129–154.Crossref, Google Scholar

