Evaluating Venture Technical Competence in Venture Capitalist Investment Decisions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2117

References

  • Alvarez RM, Glasgow G (1999) Two-stage estimation of nonrecursive choice models. Political Anal. 8(2):147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreessen M (2011) How important is it to have a technical cofounder, in order to get funding from a VC or an incubator/seed program? Accessed April 24, 2015, http://qr.ae/L5VRW.Google Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6): 1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata J. 3(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Silverman BS (2004) Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. J. Bus. Venturing 19(3):411–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Hege U (1998) Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning. J. Banking Finance 22(6):703–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biernat M, Manis M, Kobrynowicz D (1997) Simultaneous assimilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(2):254–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen KA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz LW, Barney JB (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias RP, Helfat CE (2001) The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Management 27(6):661–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. 4(1):55–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colombo MG, Grilli L (2005) Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Res. Policy 34(6):795–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper AC, Gimeno-Gascon FJ, Woo CY (1994) Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 9(5):371–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crook TR, Ketchen DJ, Combs JG, Todd SY (2008) Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management J. 29(11):1141–1154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D, Kruger J (2008) Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):98–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among us semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes DP (2005) Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? J. Bus. Venturing 20(5):623–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2006) What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):802–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2008) Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32(3):459–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedlander JP (2011) 2010 year-end shipment statistics. Report, Recording Industry Association of America, Washington, DC. Accessed April 24, 2015, http://riaa.com/media/548C3F4C-6B6D-F702-384C-D25E2AB93610.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Gladwell M (2007) Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (Bay Back Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Guler I (2007) Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):248–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haber S, Reichel A (2007) The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial process: The contribution of human capital, planning and environment resources to small venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 22(1):119–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall J, Hofer CW (1993) Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation. J. Bus. Venturing 8(1):25–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1966) Organizations and the system concept. Katz D, Kahn RL, eds. The Social Psychology of Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 14–29.Google Scholar
  • Klimoski RJ, Donahue LM (2001) Person perception in organizations: An overview of the field. London M, ed. How People Evaluate Others in Organizations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 5–43.Google Scholar
  • Kor YY (2003) Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organ. Sci. 14(6):707–719.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1121–1134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee DMS, Trauth EM, Farwell D (1995) Critical skills and knowledge requirements of is professionals: A joint academic/industry investigation. MIS Quart. 19(3):313–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • London M (2001) How People Evaluate Others in Organizations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Lowe RA, Ziedonis AA (2006) Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Sci. 52(2):173–186.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacMillan IC, Siegel R, Subba Narasimha PN (1985) Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. J. Bus. Venturing 1(1):119–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala GS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1994) Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. 19(4):487–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Motion Pictures Association of America (2011) Theatrical market statistics. Motion Pictures Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Murnieks CY, Haynie JM, Wiltbank RE, Harting T (2011) “I like how you think”: Similarity as an interaction bias in the investor–entrepreneur dyad. J. Management Stud. 48(7):1533–1561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nathan BR, Lord RG (1983) Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings. J. Appl. Psych. 68(1):102–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Venture Capital Association (2011) Venture impact: The economic importance of venture capital-backed companies to the U.S. economy. Report, National Venture Capital Association, Arlington, VA. Accessed April 24, 2015, http://www.jumpstartinc.org/companies/dl/∼/media/JumpStartInc/Images/Results-Page/2011-NVCA-VentureImpactReport.ashx.Google Scholar
  • Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(4):250–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patzelt H (2010) CEO human capital, top management teams, and the acquisition of venture capital in new technology ventures: An empirical analysis. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 27(3):131–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From it leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput. 36(4):717–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Publishers Weekly (2011) Industry sales rose 3.1% in 2010; trade e-book sales the big winner. Publishers Weekly (August 9), http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/financial-reporting/article/48280-industry-sales-rose-3-1-in-2010-trade-e-book-sales-the-big-winner.html.Google Scholar
  • Quinn RW (2007) Energizing others in work connections. Dutton JE, Ragins BR, eds. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 73–90.Google Scholar
  • Quinn RW, Dutton JE (2005) Coordination as energy-in-conversation. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):36–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. 48(1):154–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA (1999) Venture capitalists’ assessment of new venture survival. Management Sci. 45(5):621–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A, Baron RA (2003) VCs’ decision processes: Evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better. J. Bus. Venturing 18(3):381–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shrader R, Siegel DS (2007) Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(6):893–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL (2003) The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tippins MJ, Sohi RS (2003) IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management J. 24(8):745–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trauth EM, Farwell DW, Lee D (1993) The is expectation gap: Industry expectations versus academic preparation. MIS Quart. 17(3):293–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui AS, Barry B (1986) Research notes: Interpersonal affect and rating errors. Acad. Management J. 29(3):586–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyebjee TT, Bruno AV (1984) A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Sci. 30(9):1051–1066.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang S, Zhou H (2004) Staged financing in venture capital: Moral hazard and risks. J. Corporate Finance 10(1):131–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zacharakis AL, Meyer GD (2000) The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision? J. Bus. Venturing 15(4):323–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger TR, Lawrence BS (1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. 32(2):353–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.