Debt and Creative Destruction: Why Could Subsidizing Corporate Debt Be Optimal?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2120

References

  • Acharya V, DeMarzo P, Kremer I (2011) Endogenous information flows and the clustering of announcements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):2955–2979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Admati A, DeMarzo P, Hellwig M, Pfleiderer P (2013) Fallacies, irrelevant facts, and myths in the discussion of capital regulation: Why bank equity is not expensive. Rock Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper Series 161, Stanford Graduate Business School, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Aghion P, Bolton P (1992) An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(3):473–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almazan A, de Motta A, Titman S (2015) Debt, labor markets, and the creation and destruction of firms. J. Financial Econom. 118(3):636–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auerbach AJ (2002) Taxation and corporate financial policy. Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M, eds. Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 3, Handbook in Economics 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1251–1292.Google Scholar
  • Austen B (2011) The end of Borders and the future of books. Businessweek (November 10), http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/magazine/the-end-of-borders-and-the-future-of-books-11102011.html.Google Scholar
  • Board S, Skrzypacz A (2014) Revenue management with forward-looking buyers. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Bolton P, Scharfstein D (1990) A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):93–106.Google Scholar
  • Borenstein S, Rose N (2003) The impact of bankruptcy on airline service levels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):415–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brander J, Lewis T (1986) Oligopoly and financial structure: The limited liability effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):956–970.Google Scholar
  • Bulow J, Klemperer P (1999) The generalized war of attrition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):175–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell J, Giglio S, Pathak P (2011) Forced sales and house prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):2108–2131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y, Gale I (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chetty R, Saez E (2010) Dividend and corporate taxation in an agency model of the firm. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 2(3):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J (1995) Capital structure and product-market competition: Empirical evidence from the supermarket industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(3):415–435.Google Scholar
  • Chevalier J, Scharfstein D (1996) Capital-market imperfections and countercyclical markups: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):703–725.Google Scholar
  • Congressional Budget Office (1997) The economic effects of comprehensive tax reform. Report, U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC. http://www.cbo.gov/publication/10355.Google Scholar
  • Congressional Budget Office (2005) Corporate income tax rates: International comparisons. Report, U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC. http://www.cbo.gov/publication/17501.Google Scholar
  • Cramton P (1992) Strategic delay in bargaining with two-sided uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(1):205–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L (1991) Union negotiations and corporate policy: A study of labor concessions in the domestic steel industry during the 1980s. J. Financial Econom. 30(1):3–43.Google Scholar
  • Dewatripont M, Tirole J (1994) A theory of debt and equity: Diversity of securities and manager-shareholder congruence. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):1027–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond D, Rajan R (2011) Fear of fire sales, illiquidity seeking, and credit freeze. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):557–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisfeldt A, Rampini A (2008) Managerial incentives, capital reallocation, and the business cycle. J. Financial Econom. 87(1):177–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farhi E, Werning I (2012) Capital taxation: Quantitative explorations of the inverse Euler equation. J. Political Econom. 120(3):398–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fuchs W, Skrzypacz A (2010) Bargaining with arrival of new traders. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):802–836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1986) A theory of exit in duopoly. Econometrica 54(4):943–960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon R, Dietz M (2006) Dividends and taxes. Working Paper 12292, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham J (2000) How big are the tax benefits of debt? J. Finance 55(5):1901–1941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrigan K, Porter M (1983) End-game strategies for declining industries. Harvard Bus. Rev. 61(4):111–120.Google Scholar
  • Hart O, Moore J (1994) A theory of debt based on inalienability of human capital. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):841–879.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider F, Ljungqvist A (2015) As certain as debt and taxes: Estimating the tax sensitivity of leverage from exogenous state tax changes. J. Financial Econom. 118(3):684–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopenhayn H, Squintani F (2011) Preemption games with private information. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(2):667–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48(3):831–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B, Tse C (2006) Creative destruction in industries. Working Paper 12520, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kashyap A, Stein J, Hanson S (2010) An analysis of the impact of “substantially heightened” capital requirements on large financial institutions. Working paper, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Kovenock D, Phillips G (1997) Capital structure and product market behaviour: An examination of plant exit and investment decisions. Rev. Financial Stud. 10(3):767–803.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreps D, Wilson R (1982) Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory 27(2):253–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambrecht B (2001) The impact of debt financing on entry and exit in a duopoly. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(3):765–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leland H (1994) Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. J. Finance 49(4):1213–1252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorenzoni G (2008) Inefficient credit booms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):809–833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maksimovic V, Phillips G (1998) Asset efficiency and reallocation decisions of bankrupt firms. J. Finance 53(5):1619–1643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinnon J (2011) Potential tax change is red flag for some firms. Wall Street Journal (April 4), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704530204576236972476831228.Google Scholar
  • Modigliani F, Miller M (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 48(3):261–297.Google Scholar
  • Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowbray R (2011) The Fresh Market to open in former Borders site in New Orleans. The Times-Picayune (September 19), http://www.nola.com/business/index.ssf/2011/09/the_fresh_market_to_open_in_ne.html.Google Scholar
  • Newman R (2011) 4 Lessons from the demise of Borders. U.S. News (July 20), http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2011/07/20/4-lessons-from-the-demise-of-borders.Google Scholar
  • Panier F, Villanueva P, Perez-Gonzalez P (2013) Capital structure and taxes: What happens when you (also) subsidize equity? Working Paper 3111, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform (2005) Simple, fair, and pro-growth: Proposals to fix America’s tax system. Report, President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Rajan R (1992) Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arm’s-length debt. J. Finance 47(4):1367–1400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramey V, Shapiro M (1998) Capital churning. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Ramey V, Shapiro M (2001) Displaced capital: A study of aerospace plant closings. J. Political Econom. 109(5):958–992.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Royden HL (1988) Real Analysis, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1992) Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. J. Finance 47(4):1343–1366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel R (2009) All-pay contests. Econometrica 77(1):71–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel R (2010) Asymmetric contests with conditional investments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2230–2260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein J (2012) Monetary policy as financial-stability regulation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):57–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 2(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss L (2005) Book values. Barron’s (August 29), http://online.barrons.com/articles/SB112510551177924618?tesla=y.Google Scholar
  • Wurgler J (2000) Financial markets and the allocation of capital. J. Financial Econom. 58(1):187–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zingales L (1998) Survival of the fittest or the fattest? Exit and financing in the trucking industry. J. Finance 53(3):905–938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zwiebel J (1995) Corporate conservatism and relative compensation. J. Political Econom. 103(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.