On the Effectiveness of Patenting Strategies in Innovation Races

References

• Adee S (2010) EUV’s underdog light source will have its day. IEEE Spectrum 47(11):13–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH (2009) Modes of cooperative R&D commercialization by start-ups. Strategic Management J. 30(8):835–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anton JJ, Yao DA (2004) Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property. RAND J. Econom. 35(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki R, Hu JL (1999) Licensing vs. litigation: The effect of the legal system on incentives to innovate. J. Econom. Management Strategy 8(1):133–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki R, Spiegel Y (2009) Pre-grant patent publication and cumulative innovation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(3):333–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Ceccagnoli M (2006) Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Sci. 52(2):293–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Ceccagnoli M, Cohen WM (2008) R&D and the patent premium. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(5):1153–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arundel A (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Res. Policy 30(4):611–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arundel A, Patel P (2003) Strategic patenting. Background Report for the Trend Chart Policy Benchmarking Workshop New Trends in IPR Policy, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
• Arundel A, van de Paal G, Soete L (1995) Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest industrial firms: Results of the PACE survey for information sources, public research, protection of innovations and government programmes. MERIT Final Report.Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Siggelkow N (2013) Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes. Organ. Sci. 24(1):116–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Benschop J (2010) EUV: Status and challenges ahead. Keynote talk. 2010 International Workshop on EUV Lithography, Maui.Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2005) Patents and the diffusion of technical information. Econom. Lett. 86(1):121–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blind K, Cremers K, Mueller E (2009) The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Res. Policy 38(2):428–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blind K, Edler J, Frietsch R, Schmoch U (2006) Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Res. Policy 35(5):655–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M (2009) Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 30(1):81–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao RO, Kavadias S (2008) A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Management Sci. 54(5):907–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1998) Patent litigation as an information-transmission mechanism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(5):1249–1263.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crama P, De Reyck B, Degraeve Z (2008) Milestone payments or royalties? contract design for R&D licensing. Oper. Res. 56(6):1539–1552.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Siggelkow N (2010) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):661–676.Link, Google Scholar
• Denicolò V, Franzoni AL (2004) Patents, secrets, and the first-inventor defense. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13(3):517–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erkal N (2005) The decision to patent, cumulative innovation, and optimal policy. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 23(7):535–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Posen HE (2013) Do product architectures affect innovation productivity in complex product ecosystems? Adner R, Oxley JE, Silverman BS, eds. Collaboration and Competition in Business Ecosystems (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 30) (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 127–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabry B, Ernst H, Langholz J, Köster M (2006) Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities—An empirical application in the nutrition and health industry. World Patent Inform. 28(3):215–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallini NT (1992) Patent policy and costly imitation. RAND J. Econom. 23(1):52–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Shapiro C (1990) Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):106–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granstrand O (1999) The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Grindley PC, Teece DJ (1997) Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross—Licensing in semiconductors and electronics. Calif. Management Rev. 39(2):8–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH (2005) Exploring the patent explosion. J. Tech. Transfer 30(1):35–48.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Helmers C, Rogers M, Sena V (2014) The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. J. Econom. Literature 52(2):1–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horstmann IJ, MacDonald G, Slivinski A (1985) Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent. J. Political Econom. 93(5):837–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Ziedonis RH (2008) Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jell F, Henkel J (2010) Patent portfolio races in concentrated markets for technology, Working paper Technical University of Munich.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd KL (1985) On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53(3):567–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kash DE, Kingston W (2001) Patents in a world of complex technologies. Sci. Public Policy 28(1):11–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1990) How broad should the scope of patent protection be? RAND J. Econom. 21(1):113–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Kultti K, Takalo T, Toikka J (2006) Simultaneous model of innovation, secrecy, and patent policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):82–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kultti K, Takalo T, Toikka J (2007) Secrecy versus patenting. RAND J. Econom. 38(1):22–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon I (2012) Patent races with secrecy. J. Industrial Econom. 60(3):499–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langinier C (2004) Are patents strategic barriers to entry? J. Econom. Bus. 56(5):349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox M, King A (2004) Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management J. 25(4):331–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG, Gilbert R, Griliches Z (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1987(3):783–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Warglien M (1999) Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10(3):342–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Macdonald S (2004) When means become ends: Considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation. Inform. Econom. Policy 16(1):135–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch CH, Huchzermeier A (2003) Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. 49(6):733–750.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch CH, Wilkinson D, Huberman B (2010) Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Management Sci. 56(5):831–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Moore GE (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8):114–117.Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Narayanan VK (2007) Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management J. 28(3):243–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. 39(3):607–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ottoz E, Cugno F (2008) Patent–secret mix in complex product firms. Amer. Law Econom. Rev. 10(1):142–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1982) A dynamic game of R&D: Patent protection and competitive behavior. Econometrica 50(3):671–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M (2004) The private values of “thickets” and “fences”: Towards an updated picture of the use of patents across industries. Econom. Innovation and New Tech. 13(5):457–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Henkel J, Heath C (2007) On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey: Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of being infringed. Res. Policy 36(1):134–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scotchmer S, Green J (1990) Novelty and disclosure in patent law. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):131–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheehan J, Martinez C, Guellec D (2004) Understanding business patenting and licensing: Results of a survey. Patents Innovation and Economic Performance OECD Conf. Proc. (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing, Paris, France), 89–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Sommer SC, Loch CH (2004) Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. 50(10):1334–1347.Link, Google Scholar
• Sting FJ, Mihm J, Loch CH (2011) Collaborative search. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waterson M (1990) The economics of product patents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(4):860–869.Google Scholar
• Weber J (1990) Toshiba will pay TI royalty on chip patents. Los Angeles Times (December 12), http://articles.latimes.com/1990-12-12/business/fi-5989_1_japanese-patent.Google Scholar
• Ziedonis RH (2004) Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. 50(6):804–820.Link, Google Scholar