Stock Ownership and Political Behavior: Evidence from Demutualizations

References

• Abadie A, Imbens G (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74:235–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2011) Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29:1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115:715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Fuchs-Schündeln N (2007) Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97:1507–1528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alford J, Funk C, Hibbing J (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted? Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 99:153–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Elder T, Taber C (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. J. Political Econom. 113:151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagues M, Esteve-Volart B (2015) Politicians luck of the draw: Evidence from the Spanish Christmas lottery. J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2013) The behavior of individual investors. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. II(B), Chap. 22 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1533–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnes F (2004) Realignment, now more than ever. The Weekly Standard (November 22), 11–12.Google Scholar
• Bellows J, Miguel E (2009) War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. J. Public Econom. 93:1144–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:1913–1928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benoit K, Laver M (2007) Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Stud. 26:90–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119:249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Perotti E (2002) Machiavellian privatization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92:240–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bortolotti B, Fantini M, Siniscalco D (2004) Privatisation around the world: Evidence from panel data. J. Public Econom. 88:305–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunner EJ, Ross SL, Washington E (2011) Economics and policy preferences: Causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on support for redistribution and other ballot proposals. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93:888–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JY (2006) Household finance. J. Finance 61:1553–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curcuru S, Heaton J, Lucas D, Moore D (2010) Heterogeneity and portfolio choice: Theory and evidence. Ait-Sahalia Y, Hansen LP, eds. Handbook of Financial Econometrics, Vol. I (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 337–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Kaplan E (2007) The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quart. J. Econom. 122:1187–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPasquale D, Glaeser EL (1999) Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens? J. Urban Econom. 45:354–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Tella R, Galiani S, Schargrodsky E (2007) The formation of beliefs: Evidence from the allocation of land titles to squatters. Quart. J. Econom. 122:209–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duca JV, Saving JL (2008) Stock ownership and congressional elections: The political economy of the mutual fund revolution. Econom. Inquiry 46:454–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2001) Waking up to equity risk. (March 8), http://www.economist.com/node/530209?zid=306&ah=1b164dbd43b0cb27ba0d4c3b12a5e227.Google Scholar
• Engels F (1873) Zur Wohnungsfrage (Hottingen, Zürich).Google Scholar
• Enikolopov R, Petrova M, Zhuravskaya E (2011) Media and political persuasion: Evidence from Russia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:3253–3285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhemjamts O, Leverty JT (2010) Demise of the mutual organizational form: An investigation of the life insurance industry. J. Money, Credit, Banking 42:1011–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96:369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26:301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber A, Karlan D, Bergan D (2009) Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 1:35–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giuliano P, Spilimbergo A (2014) Growing up in a recession. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81:787–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glassman JK (1999) The rise of the investor class. AEI on the Issues (American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC), 1–4.Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2000) The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: A study of Finland’s unique data set. J. Financial Econom. 55:43–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Haliassos M, Jappelli T, eds. (2003) Household Portfolios (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hatemi PK, Hibbing JR, Medland SE, Keller MC, Alford JR, Smith KB, Martin NG, Eaves LJ (2010) Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs. Amer. J. Political Sci. 54:798–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64:605–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65:261–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hix S, Lord C (1997) Political Parties in the European Union (Macmillan Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86:4–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent development in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Literature 47:5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones SL, Megginson WL, Nash RC, Netter JM (1999) Share issue privatization as financial means to political and economic ends. J. Financial Econom. 53:217–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M, Torstila S (2011) Stock market aversion? Political preferences and stock market participation. J. Financial Econom. 100:98–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M, Knüpfer S (2012) Peer performance and stock market entry. J. Financial Econom. 104:321–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keloharju M, Knüpfer S, Torstila S (2008) Do retail incentives work in privatizations? Rev. Financial Stud. 21:2061–2095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klor EF, Shayo M (2010) Social identity and preferences over redistribution. J. Public Econom. 94:269–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kudlow L (1997) American Abundance: The New Economic and Moral Prosperity (Forbes Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Lamm-Tennant J, Starks LT (1993) Stock versus mutual ownership structures: The risk implications. J. Bus. 66:29–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD (1994) Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the U.S. house. J. Political Econom. 102:777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo J, Proksch S-O, Gschwend T (2014) A common left-right scale for voters and parties in Europe. Polit. Anal. 22:205–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madison J (1787) The Federalist No. X. New York Daily Advertiser (November 22).Google Scholar
• Mayers D, Smith CW, Jr (1986) Ownership structure and control: The mutualization of stock life insurance companies. J. Financial Econom. 16:73–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S (2002) A memory-based model of bounded rationality. Quart. J. Econom. 117:735–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Schwartzstein J, Shleifer A (2008) Coarse thinking and persuasion. Quart. J. Econom. 123:577–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Washington E (2009) Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 1:86–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler R (2000) Portfolio politics: Nudging the investor class forward. National Rev. 52:38–40.Google Scholar
• Nickerson DW, Rogers T (2014) Political campaigns and big data. J. Econom. Perspectives 28:51–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nurmi HJ, Nurmi L (2004) The parliamentary election in Finland, March 2003. Electoral Stud. 23:557–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswald AJ, Powdthavee N (2010) Daughters and left-wing voting. Rev. Econom. Statist. 92:213–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagano M, Volpin PF (2005) The political economy of corporate governance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95:1005–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perotti E, von Thadden E-L (2006) The political economy of corporate control and labor rents. J. Political Econom. 114:145–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1980) Bias reduction using Mahalanobis-metric matching. Biometrics 36:293–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver N (2013) The White House is not a metronome. New York Times, FiveThirtyEight (July 18), http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com.Google Scholar
• Traflet J (2003) “Own your share of American business”: Public relations at the NYSE during the cold war. Business and Economic History On-line 1.Google Scholar
• van Rooij M, Lusardi A, Alessie R (2011) Financial literacy and stock market participation. J. Financial Econom. 101:449–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkens A, Lacewell O, Regel S, Schultze H, Werner A (2010) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Washington E (2008) Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’s voting on women’s issues. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98:311–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver DH, McCombs ME, Shaw DL (2004) Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. Kaid LL, ed. Handbook of Political Communication Research (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Zhao Z (2004) Using matching to estimate treatment effects: Data requirements, matching metrics, and Monte Carlo evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86:91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar