Cultivating Disaster Donors Using Data Analytics

References

• Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Petrov BN, Caski F, eds. Proc. 2nd Internat. Sympos. Inform. Theory (Akadémiai Kiado, Budapest), 267–281.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (2006) Philanthropy. Kolm S-C, Ythier JM, eds. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1201–1269.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnett DB, German SD, Hunt SD (2003) The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. J. Marketing 67(2):89–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auten G, Joulfaian D (1996) Charitable contributions and intergenerational transfers. J. Public Econom. 59(1):55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkers RHFP, Wiepking P (2010) A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quart. 40(5):924–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V (2013) Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models. Bernoulli 19(2):521–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett R (2009) Impulsive donation decisions during online browsing of charity websites. J. Consumer Behav. 8(2–3):116–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett R, Kottasz R (2000) Emergency fund-raising for disaster relief. Disaster Prevention and Management 9(5):352–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradić J (2015) Randomized maximum-contrast selection: Subagging for large-scale regression. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1306 .3494v4, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.3494v4.pdf.Google Scholar
• Breeze B, Dean J (2012) Pictures of me: User views on their representation in homelessness fundraising appeals. Internat. J. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 17(2):132–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Spector P (1992) Submodel selection and evaluation in regression. The x-random case. Internat. Statist. Rev. 60(3):291–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown PH, Minty JH (2008) Media coverage and charitable giving after the 2004 tsunami. Southern Econom. J. 75(1):9–25.Google Scholar
• Brown S, Harris MN, Taylor K (2012) Modelling charitable donations to an unexpected natural disaster: Evidence from the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(1):97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bühlmann P, Yu B (2002) Analyzing bagging. Ann. Statist. 30(4):927–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bult JR, Van der Scheer H, Wansbeek T (1997) Interaction between target and mailing characteristics in direct marketing, with an application to health care fund raising. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 14(4):301–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnett K (2002) Relationship Fundraising: A Donor-Based Approach to the Business of Raising Money, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Calain P (2013) Ethics and images of suffering bodies in humanitarian medicine. Soc. Sci. Medicine 98:278–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charng H-W, Piliavin JA, Callero PL (1988) Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Soc. Psych. Quart. 303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Lobo MS (2009) Resource and revenue management in nonprofit operations. Oper. Res. 57(5):1114–1128.Link, Google Scholar
• Desmet P, Feinberg FM (2003) Ask and ye shall receive: The effect of the appeals scale on consumers’ donation behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 24(3):349–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond WD, Gooding-Williams S (2002) Using advertising constructs and methods to understand direct mail fundraising appeals. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12(3):225–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doob AN, McLaughlin DS (1989) Ask and you shall be given: Request size and donations to a good cause. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 19(12):1049–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A (2007) Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica 75(5):1501–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennis BM, Janssen L, Vohs KD (2009) Acts of benevolence: A limited-resource account of compliance with charitable requests. J. Consumer Res. 35(6):906–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fessler JA, Hero AO (1994) Space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 42(10):2664–2677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):746–755.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homrighausen D, McDonald DJ (2013) The lasso, persistence, and cross-validation. Dasgupta S, McAllester D, eds. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning, Atlanta, 1031–1039.Google Scholar
• Hyde MK, White KM (2009) To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 39(4):880–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones A, Posnett J (1991) Charitable donations by UK households: Evidence from the family expenditure survey. Appl. Econom. 23(2):343–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karl AT, Yang Y, Lohr SL (2014) Computation of maximum likelihood estimates for multiresponse generalized linear mixed models with non-nested, correlated random effects. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 73:146–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA, Shafir E (2011) Small matches and charitable giving: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Public Econom. 95:344–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitchen H (1992) Determinants of charitable donations in Canada: A comparison over time. Appl. Econom. 24(7):709–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K (2007) Fundraising for Social Change (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lafferty BA, Goldsmith RE, Hult GTM (2004) The impact of the alliance on the partners: A look at cause–brand alliances. Psych. Marketing 21(7):509–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38(4):963–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2006) Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):747–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2010) Is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? Evidence from a natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):958–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lankford RH, Wyckoff JH (1991) Modeling charitable giving using a Box-Cox standard Tobit model. Rev. Econom. Statist. 73(3):460–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leszczyc PTL, Rothkopf MH (2010) Charitable motives and bidding in charity auctions. Management Sci. 56(3):399–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Lien RW, Iravani SMR, Smilowitz KR (2014) Sequential resource allocation for nonprofit operations. Oper. Res. 62(2):301–317.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA (2011) The market for charitable giving. J. Econom. Perspectives 25(2):157–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Peysakhovich Y (2011) Charitable donations are more responsive to stock market booms than busts. Econom. Lett. 110:166–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLachlan GJ, Krishnan T (2008) The EM Algorithm and Extensions, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meer J, Rosen HS (2011) The ABCs of charitable solicitation. J. Public Econom. 95(5):363–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier L, van de Geer S, Bühlmann P (2008) The group lasso for logistic regression. J. Royal Statist. Soc., Ser. B 70(1):53–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) (2012) A national study of socioeconomics and health over lifetimes and across generations. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Accessed October 3, 2012, http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/.Google Scholar
• Pedraza-Martinez AJ, Van Wassenhove LN (2013) Vehicle replacement in the international committee of the Red Cross. Production Oper. Management 22(2):365–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Privett N, Erhun F (2011) Efficient funding: Auditing in the nonprofit sector. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):471–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudin C, Waltz D, Anderson RN, Boulanger A, Salleb-Aouissi A, Chow M, Dutta Het al. (2012) Machine learning for the New York City power grid. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 34(2):328–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sargeant A, Jay E (2004) Building Donor Loyalty: The Fundraiser’s Guide to Increasing Lifetime Value (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sargeant A, Jay E, Lee S (2006) Benchmarking charity performance: Returns from direct marketing in fundraising. J. Nonprofit Public Sector Marketing 16(1–2):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sargeant A, Kähler J (1999) Returns on fundraising expenditures in the voluntary sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10(1):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sargeant A, West DC, Jay E (2007) The relational determinants of nonprofit Web site fundraising effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 18(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelldorfer J, Bühlmann P, van de Geer S (2011) Estimation for high-dimensional linear mixed-effects models using ℓ1-penalization. Scandinavian J. Statist. 38(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schokkaert E (2006) The empirical analysis of transfer motives. Kolm S-C, Ythier JM, eds. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Vol. 1 (Elsevier), 127–181.Google Scholar
• Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2):461–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
• Shang J, Reed A, Croson R (2008) Identity congruency effects on donations. J. Marketing Res. 45(3):351–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw D, Shiu E, Clarke I (2000) The contribution of ethical obligation and self-identity to the theory of planned behaviour: An exploration of ethical consumers. J. Marketing Management 16(8):879–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons RG, Schimmel M, Butterworth VA (1993) The self-image of unrelated bone marrow donors. J. Health Soc. Behav. 285–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G (2003) Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G, Slovic P (2007) Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):143–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA, White KM (1999) The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British J. Soc. Psych. 38(3):225–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Royal Statist. Soc., Ser. B 58(1):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomasini RM, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) From preparedness to partnerships: Case study research on humanitarian logistics. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 16:549–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Diepen M, Donkers B, Franses PH (2009) Does irritation induced by charitable direct mailings reduce donations? Internat. J. Res. Marketing 26(3):180–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li G, Tsai C-L (2007) Regression coefficient and autoregressive order shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Royal Statist. Soc., Ser. B 69(1):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warwick M (2008) How to Write Successful Fundraising Letters, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wharton Customer Analytics Initiative (WCAI) (2011) Cultivating disaster donors: A WCAI Research Opportunity sponsored by the American Red Cross and Russ Reid (December 8). Accessed June 12, 2015, http://wcai.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/Cultivating_Disaster_Donors_Webinar.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wright SJ, Nowak RD, Figueiredo MAT (2009) Sparse reconstruction by separable approximation. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 57(7):2479–2493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yen ST (2002) An econometric analysis of household donations in the USA. Appl. Econom. Lett. 9(13):837–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zou H, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2007) On the “degrees of freedom” of the lasso. Ann. Statist. 35(5):2173–2192.Crossref, Google Scholar