The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion

References

• Adar E, Adamic LA (2005) Tracking information epidemics in blogspace. IEEE/WIC/ACM Internat. Conf. Web Intelligence (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious Diseases of Humans (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Karrer B, Adamic LA (2009) Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. Proc. Tenth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 325–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ (2011) Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on twitter. Proc. Fourth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 65–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (2004) Comments on “a new product growth for model consumer durables the bass model.” Management Sci. 50(12 supplement):1833–1840.Link, Google Scholar
• Centola D (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329(5996):1194–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chierichetti F, Kleinberg J, Liben-Nowell D (2011) Reconstructing patterns of information diffusion from incomplete observations. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, Vol. 24 (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, La Jolla, CA).Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51(4):661–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H (1957) The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20(4):253–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2004) Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(21):218701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow PA, Adamic LA, Friggeri A (2013) The anatomy of large Facebook cascades. Proc. Seventh Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Fichman RG (1992) Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. Proc. 13th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis), 195–206.Google Scholar
• Goel S, Watts DJ, Goldstein DG (2012) The structure of online diffusion networks. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 623–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golub B, Jackson MO (2010) Using selection bias to explain the observed structure of Internet diffusions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(24):10833–10836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoang T-A, Lim E-P (2012) Virality and susceptibility in information diffusions. Proc. Sixth Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Ijiri Y, Simon HA, Bonini CP, van Wormer TA (1977) Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms (North-Holland Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2010) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Jenders M, Kasneci G, Naumann F (2013) Analyzing and predicting viral tweets. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web Companion (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, New York), 657–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos E (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. Ninth ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 137–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 115(772): 700–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kupavskii A, Ostroumova L, Umnov A, Usachev S, Serdyukov P, Gusev G, Kustarev A (2012) Prediction of retweet cascade size over time. Proc. 21st ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 2335–2338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S (2010) What is twitter, a social network or a news media? WWW ’10: Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 591–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Adamic LA, Huberman BA (2007) The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web 1(1):5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Singh A, Kleinberg J (2006) Patterns of influence in a recommendation network. Adv. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining 3918:380–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J (2008) Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(12):4633–4638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lloyd AL, May RM (2001) How viruses spread among computers and people. Science 292(5520):1316–1317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez-Pintado D, Watts DJ (2008) Social influence, binary decisions and collective dynamics. Rationality Soc. 20(4):399–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons R (2000) Phase transitions on nonamenable graphs. J. Math. Phys. 41(3):1099–1126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons R (2011) The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Statist., Politics, Policy 2(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Sun A, Cong G (2013) On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in Twitter. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 64(7):1399–1410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Peterson RA (1985) Models for Innovation Diffusion, Vol. 48 (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohar B, Pisanski T (1988) How to compute the wiener index of a graph. J. Math. Chemistry 2(3):267–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Phys. 46(5):323–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(14):3200–3203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrovic S, Osborne M, Lavrenko V (2011) RT to win! Predicting message propagation in Twitter. Proc. Fifth Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Shalizi CR, Thomas AC (2011) Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2):211–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun E, Rosenn I, Marlow C, Lento T (2009) Gesundheit! Modeling contagion through facebook news feed. Proc. Third Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Toole JL, Cha M, González MC (2012) Modeling the adoption of innovations in the presence of geographic and media influences. PLoS One 7(1):e29528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsur O, Rappoport A (2012) What’s in a hashtag? Content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. Proc. Fifth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 643–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente TW (1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations, Quantitative Methods in Communication Series (Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ).Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort1. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB, Carr CT, Choi SSW, DeAndrea DC, Kim J, Tong ST, Van Der Heide B (2010) Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media influence sources online. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Vol. 17 (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Watts DJ (2002) A simple model of information cascades on random networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(9):5766–5771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiener H (1947) Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J. Amer. Chemical Soc. 69(1):17–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu S, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ (2011) Who says what to whom on Twitter. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 705–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang J, Counts S (2010) Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in Twitter. Proc. Fourth Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 355–358.Google Scholar
• Yang J, Leskovec J (2010) Modeling information diffusion in implicit networks. Proc. 10th IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 599–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young PH (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1899–1924.Crossref, Google Scholar