Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory

References

• Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2002) Who trusts others? J. Public Econom. 85(2):207–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alger I, Weibull JW (2010) Kinship, incentives, and evolution. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1725–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amir O, Rand DG, Gal YK (2012) Economic games on the internet: The effect of $1 stakes. PLoS ONE 7(2):e31461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellows J, Miguel E (2009) War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. J. Public Econom. 93(11):1144–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bisin A, Verdier T (2000) “Beyond the melting pot”: Cultural transmission, marriage, and the evolution of ethnic and religious traits. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):955–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blonski M, Ockenfels P, Spagnolo G (2011) Equilibrium selection in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma: Axiomatic approach and experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 3(3): 164–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Baytelman Y (2007) Institutions and trust implications for preferences, beliefs and behavior. Rationality Soc. 19(1):99–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Huck S (2004) Repetition and reputation: Implications for trust and trustworthiness when institutions change. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):362–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S (1998) Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. J. Econom. Literature 36(1):75–111.Google Scholar
• Bowles S (2001) Individual interactions, group conflicts, and the evolution of preferences. Durlauf SN, Young HP, eds. Social Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 155–190.Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Gintis H (2002) Prosocial emotions. Blume LE, Durlauf SN, eds. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, III: Current Perspectives and Future Directions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 339–363.Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Gintis H (2003) Origins of human cooperation. Hammerstein P, ed. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 429–443.Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2009) Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 364(1533): 3281–3288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2006) A change would do you good…. An experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):669–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Fehr E (2002) Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. Working paper, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Moene KO, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) Needs versus entitlements—An international fairness experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):574–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chudek M, Henrich J (2011) Culture gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends Cognitive Sci. 15(5):218–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cone J, Rand DG (2014) Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas. PLoS ONE 9(12): e115756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Stockman CK (2011) History dependence and the formation of social preferences: An experimental study. Econom. Inquiry 49(2):540–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen G, Dewitte S, Warlop L (2011) Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(8):1080–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P (2005) Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1591–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette GR (2011) The evolution of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekel E, Ely JC, Yilankaya O (2007) Evolution of preferences. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):685–704.Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Fudenberg D, Levine DK, Rand DG (2014) Self-control, social preferences and the effect of delayed payments. Working paper, Washington Unversity in St. Louis, St. Louis. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2477454.Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Rand DG, Fudenberg D, Nowak MA (2008) Winners don’t punish. Nature 452(7185):348–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Ochs J (2009) Cooperative behavior and the frequency of social interaction. Games Econom. Behav. 66(2):785–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Herrmann B, Nowak MA, Rand DG, Tarnita CE (2012) Civic capital in two cultures: The nature of cooperation in Romania and USA. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2179575.Google Scholar
• Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H (1996) Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(2):390–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espín AM, Brañas-Garza P, Herrmann B, Gamella JF (2012) Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B 279(1749):4923–4928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004a) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cognitive Sci. 8(4):185–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004b) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution Human Behav. 25(2):63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Khanna T (1999) Is trust a historical residue? Information flows and trust levels. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(1):79–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR, Yuksel S (2013) Infinitely repeated games in the laboratory: Four perspectives on discounting and random termination. Working paper, New York University, New York. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2225331.Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Maskin ES (1986) The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54(3):533–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Maskin ES (1990) Evolution and cooperation in noisy repeated games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):274–279.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Peysakhovich A (2014) Recency, records and recaps: Learning and non-equilibrium behavior in a simple decision problem. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Computation (ACM, New York), 971–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Rand DG, Dreber A (2012) Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):720–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Herrmann B, Thöni C (2004) Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: Survey and experimental evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 55(4):505–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Herrmann B, Thöni C (2010) Culture and cooperation. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365(1553):2651–2661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, Group AR (1999) Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gintis H (2003) The hitchhiker’s guide to altruism: Gene-culture coevolution, and the internalization of norms. J. Theoret. Biol. 220(4):407–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Laibson DI, Scheinkman JA, Soutter CL (2000) Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):811–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauge KE, Brekke KA, Johansson L-O, Johansson-Stenman O, Svedsäter H (2015) Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load. Experimental Econom., ePub ahead of print June 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9454-z.Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath Ret al. (2005) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral Brain Sci. 28(6):795–855.Google Scholar
• Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JCet al. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Ensminger J, McElreath R, Barr A, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JCet al. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327(5972):1480–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrmann B, Thoni C, Gächter S (2008) Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319(5868):1362–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herz H, Taubinsky D (2013) Market experience is a reference point in judgments of fairness. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2297773.Google Scholar
• Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan JJ, McAuliffe K, Rand DG (2014) The effects of endowment size and strategy method on third-party punishment. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2427274.Google Scholar
• Jordan JJ, Peysakhovich A, Rand DG (2015) Why we cooperate. Decety J, Wheatley T, eds. The Moral Brain: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 87–104.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Amer. Psychologist 58(9):697–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft-Todd G, Yoeli E, Bhanot S, Rand D (2015) Promoting cooperation in the field. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sci. 3:96–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2001) Trust in large organizations. Dasgupta P, Serageldin I, eds. Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC), 310–321.Google Scholar
• Leana CR III, Van Buren HJ (1999) Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):538–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine DK (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 1(3):593–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, O’Donoghue T (2004) Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. http://ssrn.com/abstract=539843.Google Scholar
• Lotz S (2015) Spontaneous giving under structural inequality: Intuition promotes cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0131562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath GJ, Samuelson L (2006) Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 38(1):24–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunn N, Wantchekon L (2011) The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3221–3253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 86(2):404–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouss A, Peysakhovich A (2015) When punishment doesn’t pay: Cold glow and decisions to punish. J. Law Econom. 58(3):625–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedersen E, Kurzban R, McCullough M (2013) Do humans really punish altruistically? A closer look. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 280(1758):Article 20122723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich A, Plagborg-Møller M (2012) A note on proper scoring rules and risk aversion. Econom. Lett. 117(1):357–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich A, Nowak MA, Rand DG (2014) Humans display a “cooperative phenotype” that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Comm. 5(September):Article 4939.Google Scholar
• Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Nowak MA (2011) The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. Nature Comm. 2(August): Article 434.Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Nowak MA (2012) Evolutionary dynamics in finite populations can explain the full range of cooperative behaviors observed in the centipede game. J. Theoret. Biol. 300:212–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Nowak MA (2013) Human cooperation. Trends Cognitive Sci. 17(8):413–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Fudenberg D, Dreber A (2015a) It’s the thought that counts: The role of intentions in noisy repeated games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116(August):481–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489(7416):427–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O (2015b) Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. J. Behavioral Decision Making 28(2):159–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Yoeli E, Hoffman M (2014a) Harnessing reciprocity to promote cooperation and the provisioning of public goods. Policy Insights Behavioral Brain Sci. 1(1):263–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Tarnita CE, Ohtsuki H, Nowak MA (2013) Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous ultimatum game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(7):2581–2586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Dreber A, Ellingsen T, Fudenberg D, Nowak MA (2009) Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325(5945):1272–1275.Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Peysakhovich A, Kraft-Todd GT, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O, Nowak MA, Green JD (2014b) Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Comm. 5(April):Article 3677.Google Scholar
• Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Roch SG, Lane JAS, Samuelson CD, Allison ST, Dent JL (2000) Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(2):185–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2002) The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70(4):1341–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson L (2001) Introduction to the evolution of preferences. J. Econom. Theory 97(2):225–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza P, Zingales L, Guiso L (2006) Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz JF, Fischbacher U, Thöni C, Utikal V (2014) Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load. J. Econom. Psych. 41(April):77–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhav A, Rand DG, Greene JD (2012) Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 141(3):423–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2013) Life after P-hacking. Meeting Soc. Personality Soc. Psych., New Orleans. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2205186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabellini G (2008) The scope of cooperation: Values and incentives. Quart. J. Econom. 123(3):905–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save More Tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(S1):S164–S187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Tinghög G, Andersson D, Bonn C, Böttiger H, Josephson C, Lundgren G, Västfjäll D, Kirchler M, Johannesson M (2013) Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature 497(7452):E1–E2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verkoeijen PPJL, Bouwmeester S (2014) Does intuition cause cooperation? PLoS ONE 9(5):e96654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welsh MB, Burns NR, Delfabbro PH (2013) The cognitive reflection test: How much more than numerical ability? Knauff M, Sebanz N, Pauen M, Wachsmuth I, eds. Proc. 35th Annual Meeting Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 1587–1592.Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T, Horita Y, Mifune N, Hashimoto H, Li Y, Shinada M, Miura A, Inukai K, Takagishi H, Simunovic D (2012) Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(50):20364–20368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoeli E, Hoffman M, Rand DG, Nowak MA (2013) Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(Supplement 2):10424–10429.Crossref, Google Scholar