The Impact of Workaround Difficulty on Frontline Employees’ Response to Operational Failures: A Laboratory Experiment on Medication Administration

References

• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E (2004) Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 11(2):104–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Sutcliffe KM, Christianson MK (2009) Speaking Up and Speaking Out: The Leadership Dynamics of Voice in Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Boyle S (2004) Nursing unit characteristics and patient outcomes. Nursing Econom. 22(3):111–119.Google Scholar
• Brief AP, Motowidlo SJ (1986) Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 11(4):710–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buerhaus PI, Staiger DO, Auerbach DI (2000) Implications of an aging registered nurse workforce. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 283(22):2948–2954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burris ER, Detert JR, Romney AC (2013) Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organ. Sci. 24(1):22–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Bush R (2007) Reducing waste in the US health care systems. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 297(8):871–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappellari L, Jenkins SP (2003) Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. Stata J. 3(3):278–2094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MR (2003) Syringe mix-up: Code orange. Nursing 33(4):18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly C (2005) Toyota assembly line inspires improvements at hospital. Washington Post (June 3) A01.Google Scholar
• Crant JM (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. J. Management 26(3):435–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumbie J (2012) Jury hold hospital and transcription company responsible for fatal medication error: $140 million verdict. PR Newswire.com (December 17), http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jury-holds-hospital–transcription-company-responsible-for-fatal-medication-error–140-million-verdict-183799281.html.Google Scholar
• Detert J, Burris E (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Management J. 50(4):869–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2011) Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad. Management J. 54(3):461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Treviño LK (2010) Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organ. Sci. 21(1):249–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Dhakar NS (2009) Modeling face-to-face and Internet based social activity participation decisions. Master’s thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1986) Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. 32(10):1301–1315.Link, Google Scholar
• Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, Zempel J (1996) Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Acad. Management J. 39(1):37–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman C, Caplan R (2007) Applying the Toyota production system: Using a patient safety alert system to reduce error. Joint Commission J. Quality Patient Safety 33(7):376–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Ashford SJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Parker SK (2009) Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):317–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (1998) Gender economics courses in liberal arts colleges: Further results. Res. Econom. Ed. 29(4):291–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2000) Econometric Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greene W (2010) Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Econom. Lett. 107(2):291–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurses AP, Carayon P (2007) Performance obstacles of intensive care nurses. Nursing Res. 56(3):185–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas MR (2006) Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Sci. 52(8):1170–1184.Link, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Wakefield DS, Wakefield BJ (2008) Work-arounds in health care settings: Literature review and research agenda. Health Care Management Rev. 33(1):2–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Savage GT, Wakefield DS, Wakefield BJ (2010) Rework and workarounds in nurse medication administration process: Implications for work processes and patient safety. Health Care Management Rev. 35(2):124–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall LM, Pedersen C, Fairley L (2010) Losing the moment: Understanding interruptions to nurses’ work. J. Nursing Admin. 40(4):169–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Lei Z, Grant AM (2009) Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1261–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holden RJ, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Faye H, Scanlon MC, Karsh B-T (2013) Automation and adaptation: Nurses’ problem-solving behavior following the implementation of bar-coded medication administration technology. Cognition, Tech. Work 15(3):283–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai M (1986) Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success (Random House Business Division, New York).Google Scholar
• Jimmerson C, Weber D, Sobek DK (2005) Reducing waste and errors: Piloting lean principles at Intermountain Healthcare. Joint Commission J. Quality Patient Safety 31(5):249–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobayashi M, Fussell SR, Xiao Y, Seagull FJ (2005) Work Coordination, Workflow and Workarounds in a Medical Context (ACM Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, Karsh B-T (2008) Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 15(4):408–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotter JP (1995) Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(2):59–67.Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Van Dyne L (1998) Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6):853–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liker J (2004) The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lukas CV, Holmes SK, Cohen AB, Restuccia J, Cramer IE, Shwartz M, Charns MP (2007) Transformational change in health care systems: An organizational model. Health Care Management Rev. 32(4):309–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyssenko N, Martinez-Espineira R (2012) “Been there done that”: Disentangling option value effects from user heterogeneity when valuing natural resources with a use component. Environmental Management 50(5):819–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire E, Kennerly SM (2006) Nurse managers as transformational and transactional leaders. Nursing Econom. 24(4):179–186.Google Scholar
• McNeely BL, Meglino BM (1994) The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 79(6):836–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monson TC, Hesley JW, Chernick L (1982) Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single-act criteria. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(2):385–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2003) Speaking up, remaining silent: The dynamics of voice and silence in organizations. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1353–1358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad. Management J. 42(4):403–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Patient Safety Agency (2010) Safer administration of insulin. Rapid Response Report NPDA/2010/RRR013, National Health Service, Redditch, UK.Google Scholar
• Parker SK (1998) Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6):835–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N (2006) Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. J. Appl. Psych. 91(3):636–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearce JL, Gregersen HB (1991) Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of mediating effects of felt responsibility. J. Appl. Psych. 76(6):838–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radnor ZJ, Holweg M, Waring J (2012) Lean in healthcare: The unfilled promise? Soc. Sci. Medicine 74(3):364–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning NP (2000) Drive out fear (unless you can drive it in): The role of agency and job security in process improvement. Management Sci. 46(11):1385–1396.Link, Google Scholar
• Resar R, Pronovost PJ, Haraden C, Simmonds T, Rainey T, Nolan T (2005) Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia. Joint Commission J. Quality Patient Safety 31(5):243–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts SJ, Demarco R, Griffin M (2009) The effect of oppressed group behaviours on the culture of the nursing workplace: A review of the evidence and interventions for change. J. Nursing Management 17(3):288–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson AG, Schroeder DM (2009) The role of front-line ideas in lean performance improvement. Quality Management J. 16(4):27–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlenker BR, Helm B, Tedeschi JT (1973) The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 25(3):419–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz KL, Juran DC, Boudreau JW, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (1998) Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. 44(12, Part 1):1595–1607.Link, Google Scholar
• Shannon RP, Frndak D, Grunden N, Lloyd JC, Herbert C, Patel B, Cummins D, Shannon AH, O’Neill PH, Spear SJ (2007) Using real-time problem solving to eliminate central line infections. Joint Commission J. Quality Patient Safety 32(9):479–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear SJ (2004) Learning to lead at Toyota. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(5): 78–91.Google Scholar
• Spear SJ, Schmidhofer M (2005) Ambiguity and workarounds as contributors to medical error. Ann. Internal Medicine 142(8):627–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Brunner DJ, Upton DM (2011) Lean principles, learning, and knowledge work: Evidence from a software services provider. J. Oper. Management 29(5):376–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker AL (2007) An empirical study of system improvement by frontline employees in hospital units. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):492–505.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2002) Managing routine exceptions: A model of nurse problem solving behavior. Friedman LH, Goes J, Savage GT, eds. Advances in Health Care Management, Vol. 3 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 87–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif. Management Rev. 45(2):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Victor B, Boynton A, Stephens-Jahng T (2000) The effective design of work under total quality management. Organ. Sci. 11(1):102–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Villena VH, Revilla E, Choi TY (2011) The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective. J. Oper. Management 29(6):561–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogelsmeier AA, Halbesleben JRB, Scott-Cawiezell JR (2008) Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. J. Amer. Medical Inform. Assoc. 15(1):114–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4): 429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Vroom VH (1995) Work and Motivation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilde J (2000) Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors. Econom. Lett. 69(3):309–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The Machine That Changed the World (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Wysocki BJ (2004) To fix health care, hospitals take tips from factory floor. Wall Street Journal (April 9) A1.Google Scholar
• Young TP, McClean SI (2008) A critical look at lean thinking in healthcare. Quality Safety Health Care 17(5):382–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G (2010) Group leaders as gatekeepers: Testing safety climate variations across levels of analysis. Appl. Psych. 59(4):647–673.Crossref, Google Scholar