The Quality of Expertise

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2271

References

  • Aumann R, Hart S (2003) Long cheap talk. Econometrica 71(6):1619–1660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benoit J-P, Dubra J (2011) Apparent overconfidence. Econometrica 79(5):1591–1625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Johnson EJ (1991) The process-performance paradox in expert judgement: How can experts know so much and predict so badly? Ericsson KA, Smith J, eds. Toward and General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 195–217.Google Scholar
  • Che Y-K, Kartik N (2009) Opinions as incentives. J. Political Econom. 117(5):815–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compte O, Postlewaite A (2004) Confidence enhanced performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1536–1557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford V, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM, Corrigan B (1974) Linear models in decision making. Psych. Bull. 81(2):95–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE (1989) Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243(4899:1668–1674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V, Morgan J (2001) A model of expertise. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):747–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V, Morgan J (2004) The art of conversation: Eliciting information from experts through multi-stage communication. J. Econom. Theory 117(2):147–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris S (1995) The common prior assumption in economic theory. Econom. Philos. 11(2):227–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santos-Pinto L, Sobel J (2005) A model of positive self-image in subjective assessments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1386–1402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi R, Yildiz M (2012) Public disagreement. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 4(3):57–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tetlock P (2006) Expert Political Judgement: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2004) Rational overoptimism (and other biases). Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):1141–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2010a) Interpersonal authority in a theory of the firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):466–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2010b) On the origin of shared beliefs (and corporate culture). RAND J. Econom. 41(4):617–648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Wesep ED (2015) The shape of cooperative communication. Working paper, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder.Google Scholar
  • Zabojnik Y (2004) A model of rational bias in self-assessments. Econom. J. 23(2):259–282.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.