When 3 + 1 > 4: Gift Structure and Reciprocity in the Field

References

• Akerlof GA (1982) Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 97(4):543–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Yellen JL (1990) The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quart. J. Econom. 105(2):255–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli O, Andersen S, Gneezy U, List JA (2015) Carrots that look like sticks: Toward an understanding of multitasking incentive schemes. Southern Econom. J. 81(3):538–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare C, Shearer B (2009) Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 67(1):233–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):122–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G (2004) Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market. J. Labor Econom. 22(3):665–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R (1993) Influence: Science and Practice (HarperCollins College Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L (2015) Fair wages and effort provision: Combining evidence from a choice experiment and a field experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1777–1794.Link, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Leider S (2012) Managerial payoff and gift exchange in the field. Working paper, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esteves-Sorenson C, Macera R (2013) Revisiting gift exchange: Theoretical considerations and a field test. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Falk A (2007) Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica 75(5):1501–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2008) Testing theories of fairness: Intentions matter. Games Econom. Behav. 62(1):287–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(3):159–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L, Zehnder C (2009) A behavioral account of the labor market: The role of fairness concerns. Annual Rev. Econom. 1:355–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart. J. Econom. 108(2):437–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouldner A (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhouse S (2014) Gap to raise minimum hourly pay. New York Times (February 19), http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/business/gap-to-raise-mini-mum-hourly-pay.html.Google Scholar
• Hannan RL, Kagel J, Moser D (2002) Partial gift exchange in an experimental labor market: Impact of subject population differences, productivity differences, and effort requests on behavior. J. Labor Econom. 20(2):923–951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (2008) Contracts as reference points. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Schmidt H, Sadrieh A, Rockenbach B (2010) In search of workers’ real effort reciprocity: A field and a laboratory experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(4):817–837.Google Scholar
• Katz L (1986) Efficiency wage theories: A partial evaluation. Fischer S, ed. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, Vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 235–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB (2013) When will there be gift exchange? Addressing the lab-field debate with a laboratory gift exchange experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2012) The currency of reciprocity: Gift exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2013) Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):853–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2014) Bonus payments and reference point violations. Management Sci. 61(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Paarsch HJ, Shearer BS (2009) The response to incentives and contractual efficiency: Evidence from a field experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(5):481–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pallais A (2014) Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(11):3565–3599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillutla M, Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2003) Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(5):448–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2002) The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70(4):1341–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar