Consumer Social Responsibility
Published Online:5 Jan 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2279
References
- (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Do ethical consumers care about price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases. Canadian J. Agricultural Econom. 54(4):555–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Do social product features have value to consumers? Internet. J. Res. Marketing 25(3):183–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The importance of social product attributes in consumer purchasing decisions: A multi-country comparative study. Internat. Bus. Rev. 19(2):140–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Are fair trade goods credence goods? A new proposal, with French illustrations. J. Bus. Ethics 92(2):331–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Do markets erode social responsibility? Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):219–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(1):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Strategy and equity: An ERC-analysis of the Güth–van Damme game. J. Math. Psychol. 42(2–3):215–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Child labor still issue on Ivory Coast cocoa farms. Businessweek (June 29), http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-06-29/child-labor-still-issue-on-ivory-coast-cocoa-farms.Google Scholar
- (2006) Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):7–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? J. Consumer Marketing 18(7):560–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(1):29–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 17(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Strategic ignorance in ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 92(August):104–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Do legal standards affect ethical concerns of consumers? An experiment on minimum wages. Working Paper 12-03, Department of Economics, University of Manneheim, Manneheim, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2010) The Myth of the Ethical Consumer (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (2006) The other CSR: Consumer social responsibility. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 4(3):30–37.Google Scholar
- (2010) Why don’t consumers consume ethically? J. Consumer Behav. 9(6):426–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Economist, The (2010) Light and death: A series of deaths expose a big computer-maker to unaccustomed scrutiny. (May 27), http://www.economist.com/node/16231588.Google Scholar
- Economist, The (2012) A “distinctly South Asian” tragedy. (December 6), http://www.economist.com/node/21568003.Google Scholar
- (2012) Consumer and agent ethics. About the accountability for moral action of and inside companies. J. Bus., Econom. Ethics 13(3):236–254.Google Scholar
- (2016) Signaling corporate social responsibility: Third-party certification vs. brands. Scandinavian J. Econom. 118(3):397–432Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Morals and markets. Science 340(6133):707–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) An experimental study of corporate social responsibility through charitable giving in Bertrand markets. IWQW Discussion Paper Series 03/2014, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Kremer K, Macho V, eds. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63 (Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany), 79–93.Google Scholar
- (2016) Self-image and willful ignorance in social decisions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (1998) Information, strategic behavior and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. J. Math. Psychol. 42(2–3):227–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Consumer demand for the fair trade: Evidence from a multistore field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(2):242–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Is there consumer demand for improved labor standards? Evidence from field experiments in social labeling. Working paper, Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2011) Consumer demand for fair labor standards: Evidence from a field experiment on eBay. Working paper, Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
- (2014) Transparency and indirect reciprocity in social responsibility: An incentivized experiment. Darden Business School Working Paper 2518627, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
- (2012) You owe me. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, Waltham, MA), 105–142.Google Scholar
- (2000) Eurobarometer 47.0: Images of Germany, consumer issues, electronic information, and fair trade practices, January–February 1997. [Computer file]. Conducted by INRA (Europe), Brussels. ZA ed. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung [producer], 2000. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 2000. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02088.v1.Google Scholar
- (2011) “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?”: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. J. Bus. Ethics 104(4):449–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Requests and social distance in dictator games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Ethical differentiation and market behavior: An experimental approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(2):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Measuring consumer’s willingness to pay for organic and fair trade products. Internat. J. Consumer Stud. 32(5):479–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Dynamics of social ties and local public good provision. J. Public Econom. 64(3):323–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Investigating Web-based recruitment sources: Employee testimonials vs word-of-mouse. Internat. J. Selection and Assessment 15(4):372–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Displaying employee testimonials on recruitment websites: Effects of communication media, employee race, and job seeker race on organizational attraction and information credibility. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(5):1354–1364.Crossref, Google Scholar

