The Role of Brand Image and Product Characteristics on Firms’ Entry and OEM Decisions

References

• Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sappington DEM (2005) The bright side of supplier encroachment. Marketing Sci. 26(5):651–659.Link, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S (1998) Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Sci. 17(3):181–195.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Song J-S, Zheng X (2008) “Bricks-and-mortar” vs. “clicks-and-mortar”: An equilibrium analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(3):671–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blume A (2003) Bertrand without fudge. Econom. Lett. 78(2):167–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. 51(1):30–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Cai G (2010) Channel selection and coordination in dual-channel supply chains. J. Retailing 86:22–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caldieraro F, Coughlan AT (2007) Spiffed-up channels: The role of spiffs in hierarchical selling organizations. Marketing Sci. 26(1):31–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan Choi S, Coughlan AT (2006) Private label positioning: Quality versus feature differentiation from the national brand. J. Retailing 82(2):79–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Iyer G (2002) Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. 21(2):197–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen JX, Narasimhan O, John G, Dhar T (2010) An empirical investigation of private label supply by national label producers. Marketing Sci. 29(4):738–755.Link, Google Scholar
• Chiang WK, Chhajed D, Hess JD (2003) Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management Sci. 49(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi SC (2003) Expanding to direct channel: Market coverages as entry barrier. J. Interactive Marketing 17(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou S-Y, Wu C-C (2006) A comment on “Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters”. Marketing Sci. 25(5):538–542.Link, Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT, Anderson E, Stern LW, El-Ansary AI (2001) Marketing Channels, 6th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Desai PS (2001) Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. 20(3):265–283.Link, Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Gal-Or E, Srinivasan K (2006) Channel bargaining with retailer asymmetry. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N (1984) The principle of minimum differentiation revisited. Eur. Econom. Rev. 24(3):345–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauli-Oller R, Sandonís J (2002) Welfare reducing licensing. Games Econom. Behav. 41(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Ofek E, Sarvary M (2009) Content vs. advertising: The impact of competition on media firm strategy. Marketing Sci. 28(1):20–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoannes L, McWilliams G (2000) IBM, Compaq set data-storage alliance. Wall Street Journal 236(4):B3.Google Scholar
• IBM (2013) IBM system storage product guide. Marketing materials, IBM Corporation Systems and Technology Group, Somers, NY.Google Scholar
• Ingene CA, Parry ME (1995) Channel coordination when retailers compete. Marketing Sci. 14(4):360–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Ishibashi I, Matsushima N (2009) The existence of low-end firms may help high-end firms. Marketing Sci. 28(1):136–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeuland AP, Shugan SM (1983) Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. 3(2):239–272.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamien MI, Oren SS, Tauman Y (1992) Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation. J. Math. Econom. 21(5):483–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) On the licensing of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 16(4):504–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim B, Shi M, Srinivasan K (2001) Reward programs and tacit collusion. Marketing Sci. 20(2):99–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Ruan R (2006) On manufacturers complementing the traditional retail channel with a direct online channel. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(3):289–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Steenkamp JEM (2007) Private Label Strategy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lee E, Staelin R (1997) Vertical strategic interaction: Implications for channel pricing strategy. Marketing Sci. 16(3):185–207.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yanagawa T (2011) Patent licensing of Stackelberg manufacturer in a differentiated product market. Internat. J. Econom. Theory 7(1):7–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin P (1996) Fixed-fee licensing of innovations and collusion. J. Indust. Econom. 44(4):443–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin L, Kulatilaka N (2006) Network effects and technology licensing with fixed fee, royalty, and hybrid contracts. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(2):91–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang JZ (2006) The benefits of personalized pricing in a channel. Marketing Sci. 25(1):97–105.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Putler DS, Weinberg CB (2004) Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters. Marketing Sci. 23(1):120–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Putler DS, Weinberg CB (2006) A reply to “A comment on ‘Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters.’ ” Marketing Sci. 25(5):543–546.Link, Google Scholar
• McGuire TW, Staelin R (1983) An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. 2(2):161–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1987) Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. 6(4):375–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Nasser S, Turcic D, Narasimhan C (2013) National brands’ response to store brands: Throw in the towel or fight back? Marketing Sci. 32(4):591–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Printing World (2006) OCE open house: Going wide. (April 6):24.Google Scholar
• Raju JS, Sethuraman R, Dhar SK (1995) The introduction and performance of store brands. Management Sci. 41(6):957–978.Link, Google Scholar
• Richards D (2006) Camera test: Samsung Digimax GX-1S. Popular Photography 70(7):66–70.Google Scholar
• Rockett KE (1990) Choosing the competition and patent licensing. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):161–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubel O, Zaccour G (2007) A differential game of a dual distribution channel. Ann. Internat. Soc. Dynamic Games 9:547–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sayman S, Hoch SJ, Raju JS (2002) Positioning of store brands. Marketing Sci. 21(4):378–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C (1985) Patent licensing and R&D rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):25–30.Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT, Savaskan RC (2010) Optimal reverse channel structure for consumer product returns. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tremblay VJ, Polasky S (2002) Advertising with subjective horizontal and vertical product differentiation. Rev. Indust. Organ. 20(3):253–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trivedi M (1998) Distribution channels: An extension of exclusive retailership. Management Sci. 44(7):896–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2004) Channel conflict and coordination in the e-commerce age. Production Oper. Management 13(1):93–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1989) Price discrimination. Schmalensee R, Willig RD, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. I (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 597–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (1998) Product line design for a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 17(2):156–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang XH (1998) Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. Econom. Lett. 60(1):55–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang XH (2002) Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly. J. Econom. Bus. 54(2):253–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu C-C, Wang C-J (2005) A positive theory of private label: A strategic role of private label in a duopoly national-brand market. Marketing Lett. 16(2):143–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao W, Xu Y (2012) The impact of royalty contract revision in a multistage strategic R&D alliance. Management Sci. 58(12):2251–2271.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang X (2009) Retailers’ multichannel and price advertising strategies. Marketing Sci. 28(6):1080–1094.Link, Google Scholar