Spatial Organization of Firms and Location Choices Through the Value Chain

References

• Adams J, Jaffe A (1996) Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND J. Econom. 27(4):700–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharonson B, Baum J, Plunket A (2008) Inventive and uninventive clusters: The case of Canadian biotechnology. Res. Policy 37(6–7):1108–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J (2006) Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Sci. 52(10):1457–1471.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategy and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2014) Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1749–1761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atalay E, Hortaçsu A, Syverson C (2014) Vertical integration and input flows. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1120–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):253–273.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P (2004) Capturing knowledge within and across firm boundaries, evidence from clinical development. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1591–1612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.Link, Google Scholar
• Berndt ER, Cockburn I (2012) Price index for clinical trial: A feasibility study. NBER Working Paper 18918, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk S, McCann P, Mudambi R (2010) Place, space, and organization: Economic geography and the multinational enterprise. J. Econom. Geography 10(4):485–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BioScan (1992) The Worldwide Biotech Industry Reporting Service, Vol. 6 (Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ).Google Scholar
• Buenstorf G, Klepper S (2009) Heritage and agglomeration: The Akron tyre cluster revisited. Econom. J. 119(537):705–733.Google Scholar
• Chacar AS, Lieberman M (2003) Organizing for technological innovation in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Sorenson O, Baum J, eds. Geography and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 299–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Choudhury P (2010) Seeking resources or seeking knowledge? A study of mobility and knowledge creation using micro data. Working paper.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Chew WB, Fujimoto T (1987) Product development in the world auto industry. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 3:729–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortright J, Mayer H (2002) Signs of life: The growth of biotechnology centers in the U.S. Report, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2012) Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Sci. 58(6):1059–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Delgado M, Porter ME, Stern S (2010) Clusters and entrepreneurship. J. Econom. Geography 10(4):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delgado M, Porter ME, Stern S (2014) Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Res. Policy 43(10):1785–1799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Minin A, Bianchi M (2011) Safe nests in global nets: Internalization and appropriability of R&D in wireless telecom. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(7):910–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumais G, Ellison G, Glaeser EL (2002) Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(2):193–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1454–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP (2003) The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Indust. Innovation 10(3):311–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Audretsch D (1999) Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization, and localized competition. Eur. Econom. Rev. 43(2):409–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Schreuder Y (1996) Initial advantage: The origins of geographic concentration of the pharmaceutical industry in the mid-Atlantic region. Indust. Corporate Change 5(3):839–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fort T (2011) Breaking up is hard to do: Why firms fragment production across locations. Working Paper CES-WP-13-35, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Furman J, MacGarvie M (2007) Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):756–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J, Kyle M, Cockburn I, Henderson R (2005) Public and private spillovers, location, and the productivity of pharmaceutical research. Ann. d’Econom. Statist. 79/80:167–190.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Murray F, Stern S (2013) Choosing an entrepreneurial strategy. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Giroud X (2013) Proximity and investment: Evidence from plant-level data. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):861–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Kerr WR (2009) Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(3):623–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton B, Nickerson J, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson G (2001) Scale economies and the geographic concentration of industry. J. Econom. Geography 1(3):255–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C (1997) Know-how complementarities and knowledge transfer within firms: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. 18(5):339–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson JV (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J. Urban Econom. 53(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1996) Scale, scope and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson JV, Ono Y (2008) Where do manufacturing firms locate their headquarters? J. Urban Econom. 63(2):431–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs J (1984) Cities and the Wealth of Nations: Principles of Economic Life (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Johnson KP, Kort JR (2004) 2004 redefinition of the BEA economic areas. Surv. Curr. Bus. 84(11):68–75.Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Lafontaine F (2013) Too far away? The effect of distance to headquarters on business establishment performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 5(3):157–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M (2006) When does co-location of manufacturing and R&D matter? Discussion Paper 1051, Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Ali-Yrkkö J (2009) Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: Postindustrial myth or economic reality? Rev. Policy Res. 26(1–2):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman M (2008) Communication (and coordination?) in a modern, complex organization. Working Paper 09-004, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Political Econom. 99(3):483–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1988) The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. internal technology. Management Sci. 34(10):1157–1168.Link, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1920) Principles of Economics; An Introductory Volume (Macmillan and Co., London).Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1997) The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Business Rev. (November):61–78.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1998) Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments, and institutions. Porter ME, ed. On Competition (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 197–299.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (2003) The economic performance of regions. Regional Stud. 37(6–7):549–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ricardo D (1817) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (John Murray, London).Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Henderson JV, Thisse JF, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam), 2119–2171.Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2010) Small establishments/big effects: Agglomeration, industrial organization, and entrepreneurship. Glaeser E, ed. Agglomeration Economics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Shaver JM, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. 21(12):1175–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storper M (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur. Urban Regional Stud. 2(3):191–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tate G, Yang L (2015) The bright side of corporate diversification: Evidence from internal labor markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(8):2203–2249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tecu I (2013) The location of industrial innovation: Does manufacturing matter? Working Paper CES-WP-13-09, Center for Economic Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Toole AA (2003) Understanding entrepreneurship in the US biotechnology industry: Characteristics, facilitating factors, and policy challenges. Hart DM, ed. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the US Knowledge Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 175–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11, Part 2):S1–S18.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker L, Brewer M, Darby M (1998) Intellectual capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar