Economic and Policy Implications of Restricted Patch Distribution
Published Online:2 Mar 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2309
References
- (2006) Sell first, fix later: Impact of patching on software quality. Management Sci. 52(3):465–471.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Impact of vulnerability disclosure and patch availability—An empirical analysis. Third Annual Workshop on Economics of Information Security (WEIS04), Minneapolis.Google Scholar
- (2013) The influence of software process maturity and customer error reporting on software release and pricing. Management Sci. 59(12):2702–2726.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Network software security and user incentives. Management Sci. 52(11):1703–1720.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Let the pirates patch? An economic analysis of software security patch restrictions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(1):48–70.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) A model of piracy. Inform. Econom. Policy 18(3):303–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Measuring pay-per-install: The commoditization of malware distribution. Proc. 20th USENIX Security Symp. (USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA), 187–202.Google Scholar
- (2003) Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. 37(2):125–139.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2010) Trading higher software piracy for higher profits: The case of phantom piracy. Management Sci. 56(11):1946–1962.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. J. Management Inform. Systems 13(4):29–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 27(4):610–626.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Optimal software development: A control theoretic approach. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):292–306.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Post-release testing and software release policy for enterprise-level systems. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):635–657.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Markets for software vulnerabilities? Think again. Management Sci. 51(5):726–740.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The halo effect and what businesses need to know about Macs, malware and security myth. Symantec Enterprise Security (blog), November 19, http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/halo-effect-what-businesses-need-know-about-macs-malware-security-myths.Google Scholar
- (2009) Optimal allocation of effort to software maintenance: A queuing theory approach. Production Oper. Management 18(5):506–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Revisiting the incentive to tolerate illegal distribution of software products. Decision Support Systems 53(2):357–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Effects of piracy on quality of information goods. Management Sci. 59(1):245–264.Link, Google Scholar
- Microsoft (2014) Updates: frequently asked questions. Accessed February 9, 2015, http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows/updates-faq#1TC=windows-7.Google Scholar
- (2009) Information security: Facilitating user precautions vis-à-vis enforcement against attackers. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(2):97–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Channel praises Microsoft plan to “stigmatize” software pirates. CRN (January 26), http://www.crn.com/news/applications-os/57704094/channel-praises-microsoft-plan-to-stigmatize-software-pirates.htm.Google Scholar
- (2001) The Economics of Network Industries (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Who has standing in cost-benefit analysis? J. Policy Anal. Management 9(2):201–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Managing online security risks. New York Times (June 1), http://www.nytimes.com/library/financial/columns/060100econ-scene.html.Google Scholar

