Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?

References

• Abeler J, Becker A, Falk A (2014) Representative evidence on lying costs. J. Public Econom. 113:96–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D (2012) The Honest Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone—Especially Ourselves (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Garcia-Rada X, Hornuf L, Mann H (2014) The (true) legacy of two really existing economic systems. Munich Discussion Paper 2014-26, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Azar OH, Yosef S, Bar-Eli M (2013) Do customers return excessive change in a restaurant? A field experiment on dishonesty. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:219–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batigalli P, Dufwenberg M, Charness G (2013) Deception: The role of guilt. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:227–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76:169–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billings Gazette (2009) Shepherd man admits Social Security fraud. (December 21), http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_63e7610a-ee8e-11de-abc4001cc4c03286.html.Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Kramer RM (1986) Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50:543–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucciol A, Landini F, Piovesan M (2013) Unethical behavior in the field: Demographic characteristics and beliefs of cheaters. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:248–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron JS, Miller DT (2009) Different ethical standards in gain versus loss frames. de Cremer D, ed. Psychological Perspectives on Ethical Behavior and Decision Making (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC), 91–106.Google Scholar
• Cameron JS, Miller D, Monin B (2008) Deservingness and unethical behavior in loss and gain frames. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Cappelen A, Sørensen E, Tungodden B (2013) When do we lie? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:258–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74:1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Gürtler O (2015) Sabotage in contests: A survey. Public Choice 64:135–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50:1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47:448–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Johannesson M (2008) Gender differences in deception. Econom. Lett. 99:197–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott C, Smith V, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, New York), 1061–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Mollerstrom J, Munkhammar S (2013) Gender differences in social framing effects. Econom. Lett. 118:470–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engström P, Nordblom K, Ohlsson H, Persson A (2015) Tax compliance and loss aversion. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 7:132–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58:723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Föllmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise—An experimental study on cheating. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11:525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friesen L, Gangadharan L (2012) Individual level evidence of dishonesty and the gender effect. Econom. Lett. 117:624–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer R, Levitt SD, List J, Sadoff S (2012) Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. Working Paper 18237, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Gu J, Zhong CB (2009) Contagion or restitution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45:1299–1302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 9:384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rockenbach B, Serra-Garcia M (2013) Measuring lying aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:293–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gravert C (2013) How luck and performance affect stealing. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:301–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1:114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall M (2013) The man who fell to earth. Texas Monthly (March), http://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/the-man-who-fell-to-earth/.Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38:79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herweg F, Schmidt KM (2015) Loss aversion and inefficient renegotiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82:297–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herweg F, Müller D, Weinschenk P (2010) Binary payment schemes: Moral hazard and loss aversion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:2451–2477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houser D, Vetter S, Winter J (2012) Fairness and cheating. Eur. Econom. Rev. 56:1645–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacob BA, Levitt SD (2003) Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quart. J. Econom. 118:843–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobsen C, Piovesan M (2016) Tax me if you can: An artifactual field experiment on dishonesty. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 124(April):7–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch I, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76:728–741.Google Scholar
• Kant I (1949) Critique of Practical Reason, and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kern M, Chugh D (2009) Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psych. Sci. 20:378–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirchler E, Maciejovsky B (2001) Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession. J. Econom. Psych. 22:173–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List J, Neckermann S, Sadoff S (2013) The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. NBER Working Paper 18165, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Thoma C (2014) Do women have more shame than men? An experiment on self-assessment and the shame of overestimating oneself. Working paper, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Lundquist T, Ellingsen T, Gribbe E, Johannesson M (2009) The aversion to lying. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70:81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann H, Garcia-Rada X, Hornuf L, Tafurt J, Ariely D (2014) Similar patterns of cheating across cultures. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. 45:633–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newberry KJ, Reckers PMJ, Wyndelts RW (1993) An examination of tax practitioner decisions: The role of preparer sanctions and framing effects associated with client condition. J. Econom. Psych. 14:439–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum SM, Billinger S, Stieglitz N (2014) Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling. J. Econom. Psych. 45:181–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowatt WC, Cunningham MR, Druen PB (1999) Lying to get a date: The effect of facial physical attractiveness on the willingness to deceive prospective dating partners. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 16:209–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Ordóñez L, Douma B (2004) Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 47:422–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalvi S (2012) Dishonestly increasing the likelihood of winning. Judgment Decision Making 7:292–303.Google Scholar
• Sutter M (2009) Deception through telling the truth? Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. Econom. J. 119:47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibbetts SG (1999) Differences between women and men regarding decisions to commit test cheating. Res. Higher Ed. 40:323–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toma C, Hancock J, Ellison N (2008) Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34:1023–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106:1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76:1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth S (2011) Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115:157–168.Crossref, Google Scholar