Frenemies: How Do Financial Firms Vote on Their Own Kind?

References

• Agrawal A (2012) Corporate governance objectives of labor union shareholders. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:187–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appel IR, Gormley TA, Keim DB (2016) Passive investors, not passive owners. J. Financial Econom. 121:111–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf R, Jayaraman N, Ryan HE Jr (2012) Do pension-related business ties influence mutual fund proxy voting? Evidence from shareholder proposals on executive compensation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 47:567–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bang J (2010) Tit-for-tat compensation. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Beaudette M (2009) Fuld tops Portfolio’s worst CEO list. Bankruptcy Beat (blog), April 23, http://blogs.wsj.com/bankruptcy/2009/04/23/fuld-tops-portfolios-worst-ceo-list/.Google Scholar
• Becher DA, Mulherin JH, Walking RA (2012) Sources of gains in corporate mergers: Refined tests from a neglected industry. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 47:57–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berglöf E, Perotti E (1994) The governance structure of the Japanese financial keiretsu. J. Financial Econom. 36:259–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Preston I (2007) Electoral bias and policy choice: Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 122:1473–1510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bethel JE, Gillan S (2002) The impact of the institutional and regulatory environment on shareholder voting. Financial Management 31:29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee B (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. 73:305–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler AW, Gurun UG (2012) Educational networks, mutual fund voting patterns, and CEO compensation. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:2533–2562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Garner JL, Walkling RA (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64:2389–2421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calluzzo P, Kedia S (2014) Mutual fund board connections and proxy voting. Working paper, Rutgers Business School, Piscataway Township, NJ.Google Scholar
• Chen S, Ho KW, Ik KH (2005) The wealth effect of new product introductions on industry rivals. J. Bus. 78:969–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremers KJM, Romano R (2011) Institutional investors and proxy voting on compensation plans: The impact of the 2003 mutual fund voting disclosure rule. Amer. Law Econom. Rev. 13:220–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvijanovic D, Dasgupta A, Zachariadis KE (2016) Ties that bind: How business connections affect mutual fund activism. J. Finance 71:2933–2966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Kim EH (2007) Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. J. Financial Econom. 85:552–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Gerken WC, Ivković Z, Weisbenner SJ (2013) Locked-in to govern: How the capital gain of a stock holding affects a mutual fund’s voting decision. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010) Corporate governance in financial institutions: Lessons to be drawn from the current financial crisis, best practices. Commission Staff Working Document, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. 43:153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Harford J, Tran AL (2015) Motivated monitors: The importance of institutional investors’ portfolio weights. J. Financial Econom. 118:21–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall A, Peixe F (2003) A consistent method for the selection of relevant instruments. Econometric Rev. 22:269–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartzell JC, Ofek E, Yermack D (2004) What’s in it for me? CEOs whose firms are acquired. Rev. Financial Stud. 17:37–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik J, Stein J (2005) Thy neighbor’s portfolio: Word-of-mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers. J. Finance 60:2801–2824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishii J, Xuan Y (2014) Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. J. Financial Econom. 112:344–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Lacina M, Park MS (2008) Positive and negative information transfers from management forecasts. J. Accounting Res. 46:885–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF, McFadden DL (1981) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data and Econometric Analysis (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Massa M, Rehman Z, Vermaelen T (2007) Mimicking repurchases. J. Financial Econom. 84:624–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan A, Poulsen A, Wolf J, Yang T (2011) Mutual funds as monitors: Evidence from mutual fund voting. J. Corporate Finance 17:914–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neate R (2013) Shell suffers embarrassing shareholder rebellion over executive pay. Guardian (May 21), http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/may/21/shell-suffers-embarrassing-shareholder-rebellion.Google Scholar
• Richmond R (2007) Yahoo holders send message. Wall Street Journal (June 13), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118167269875732781.Google Scholar
• Rothberg B, Lilien S (2006) Mutual funds and proxy voting: New evidence on corporate governance. J. Bus. Tech. Law 1:157–184.Google Scholar
• Schmidt C (2012) Shareholder monitoring incentives and corporate policies. Working paper, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz-Ziv M, Wermers R (2014) Do mutual funds have a say on pay? Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2014) How do industry peers respond to control threats? Management Sci. 60:380–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Stock J, Watson M (2010) Introduction to Econometrics, 3rd ed., Series in Economics (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Stock JH, Andrews DWK, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometrics Models (Cambridge University Press, New York), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan N (2011) Dick Fuld rip out your heart. YouTube video, 1:07. October 28, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZCmWkQuyPc.Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum R (2003) For funds, disclosure is hardly in fashion. New York Times (January 5), http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/05/business/mutual-funds-report-for-funds-disclosure-is-hardly-in-fashion.html.Google Scholar
• Tonello M, Rabimov S (2010) The 2010 institutional investment report: Trends in asset allocation and portfolio composition. Report R-1468-10-RR, Conference Board, New York.Google Scholar
• Wahal S, Wang A (2011) Competition among mutual funds. J. Financial Econom. 99:40–59.Crossref, Google Scholar