Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs

References

• Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58(2):219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing value of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J, Walby S (2012) Gender quotas in management boards. Report to the European Parliament’ Committee on Gender Equality, European Parliament, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Association of Executive Search Consultants (2011) Retained and contingency executive search: The key differences. White paper, Association of Executive Search Consultants, New York. http://members.aesc.org/eweb/upload/Retained%20and%20Contingency_Text%20version.pdf.Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Petrongolo B (2014) Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments? Labour Econom. 30(October):32–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Baron JN, Stuart TE (2000) Avenues of attainment: Occupational demography and organizational careers in the California civil service. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(1):88–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barreto M, Ryan MK, Schmitt MT, eds. (2009) The Glass Ceiling in the 21st Century: Understanding Barriers to Gender Equality (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsh J, Devillard S, Wang J (2012) The global gender agenda. McKinsey Quart. (November):1–9.Google Scholar
• Baum CF (2006) Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1991) A Treatise on the Family, enlarged ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Belliveau M (2005) Blind ambition? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organ. Sci. 16(2):134–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock K (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2014) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway. Working Paper 20256, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Betz M, O’Connell L (1989) Work orientation of males and females: Exploring the gender socialization approach. Sociol. Inquiry 59(3):318–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Mollick E (2015) Shifts and ladders: Comparing the role of internal and external mobility in executive careers. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1629–1645.Link, Google Scholar
• Bielby DD, Bielby WT (1984) Work commitment, sex role attitudes, and women’s employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):234–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby DD, Bielby WT (1988) She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 93(5):1031–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Brinton MC, Grusky DB, eds. (2006) The Declining Significance of Gender? (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Bonet R, Cappelli P, Hamori M (2013) Labor market intermediaries and the new paradigm for human resources. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):341–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands R, Fernandez-Mateo I (2015) Gender differences in responses to rejection in executive recruitment. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Brett JM, Stroh LK (1997) Jumping ship: Who benefits from an external labor market career strategy? J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Hamori M (2005) The new road to the top. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(1):25–32.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Hamori M (2014) Understanding executive job search. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1511–1529.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardoso AR, Winter-Ebmer R (2010) Female-led firms and gender wage policies. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 64(1):143–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carli LL, Eagly AH (2001) Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):629–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2008) Gender, race and meritocracy in organizational careers. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(6):1479–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2013) Catalyst 2013 census of Fortune 500: Still no progress after years of no progress. Press release (December 10), Catalyst, New York. http://www.catalyst.org/media/catalyst-2013-census-fortune-500-still-no-progress-after-years-no-progress.Google Scholar
• Cejka MA, Eagly AH (1999) Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(4):413–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen PN, Huffman ML (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen LE, Broschak JP, Haveman HA (1998) And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(5):711–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colaco HMJ, Myers P, Reiss Nitkin M (2011) Pathways to leadership: Board independence, diversity and the emerging pipeline in the United States for women directors. Internat. J. Disclosure Governance 8(2):122–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S (2006) Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, eds. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 23 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dezso CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Soule WT (1988) Gender and promotion in segmented job ladder systems. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53(1):26–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doldor E, Vinnicombe S, Gaughan M, Sealy R (2012) Gender diversity on boards: The appointment process and the role of executive search firms. Report, Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 85, EHRC, Manchester, UK. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/research/rr85_final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dreher GF, Lee J-Y, Clerkin TA (2011) Mobility and cash compensation: The moderating effects of gender, race, and executive search firms. J. Management 37(3):651–681.Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Carli LA (2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell W (2005) Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gap—And What Women Can Do About It (American Management Association, New York).Google Scholar
• Felix PM (2012) Advancing board diversity: Search firms can do more. Directors Boards 36:27.Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Abraham M (2010) From metaphors to mechanisms: Gender sorting in(to) an organizational hierarchy. Research Paper 4779-10, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Abraham M (2011) Glass ceilings and glass doors? Internal and external hiring in an organizational hierarchy. Research Paper 48950-11, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Campero S (2016) Gender sorting and the glass ceiling in high-tech firms. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Friedrich C (2011) Gender sorting at the application interface. Indust. Relations 50(4):591–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Mors ML (2008) Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(4):1061–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Sosa LM (2005) Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3):859–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Weinberg N (1997) Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(6):883–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Coh M (2015) Coming with baggage: Past rejections and the evolution of market relationships. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1381–1399.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, King Z (2011) Anticipatory sorting and gender segregation in temporary employment. Management Sci. 57(6):989–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Finlay W, Coverdill JE (2002) Headhunters: Matchmaking in the Labor Market (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Foschi M (2000) Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26:21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M (2009) Gender, performance level, and competence standards in task groups. Soc. Sci. Res. 38(2):447–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M, Valenzuela J (2012) Who is the better applicant? Effects from gender, academic record, and type of decision. Soc. Sci. Res. 41(4):949–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith AH, Sedo S, Darity W Jr, Hamilton D (2004) The labor supply consequences of perceptions of employer discrimination during search and on-the-job: Integrating neoclassical theory and cognitive dissonance. J. Econom. Psych. 25(1):15–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodley S (2014) Vince Cable considers all-female shortlists for city firms’ top jobs. Guardian (March 3), http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/mar/04/vince-cable-considers-female-only-shortlists-city-jobs.Google Scholar
• Gorman E, Kmec J (2009) Hierarchical rank and women’s organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(5):1428–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Government Equality Office (2011) Women on boards. Report, Government Equality Office, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31480/11-745-women-on-boards.pdf.Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1995) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory-Smith I, Main BGM, O’Reilly CA III (2013) Appointments, pay and performance in UK boardrooms by gender. Econom. J. 124(574):F109–F128.Google Scholar
• Gujarati DN (1995) Basic Econometrics, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Hamori M (2010) Who gets headhunted—and who gets ahead? The impact of search firms on executive careers. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(4):46–59.Google Scholar
• Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. 18(11):895–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassink WJ, Russo G (2008) Wage differences between internal and external candidates. Internat. J. Manpower 29(8):715–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassink WJ, Russo G (2010) The glass door: The gender composition of newly-hired workers across hierarchical job levels. Discussion Paper 4858, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1995) Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know. J. Soc. Behav. Personality 10(6):3–26.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herring C (2009) Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(2):208–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hom PW, Roberson L, Ellis AD (2008) Challenging conventional wisdom about who quits: Revelations from corporate America. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffman ML, Cohen PN, Pearlman J (2010) Engendering change: Organizational dynamics and workplace gender desegregation, 1975–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):255–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jupina A (1992) The Handbook of Executive Search Research: A How-To Guide for Researchers, Search Consultants, Corporate Recruiters and Line Executives (Kennedy Publications, Fitzwilliam, NH).Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2002) Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurtulus FA, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2012) Do female top managers help women to advance? A panel study using EEO-1 records. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):173–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Oyer P (2004) Internal and external labor markets: A personnel economics approach. Labour Econom. 11(5):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Judiesch MK (1999) Are women more likely to be hired or promoted into management positions? J. Vocational Behav. 54(1):158–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marini MM, Brinton MC (1984) Sex typing in occupational socialization. Reskin B, ed. Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) 192–232.Google Scholar
• Marini MM, Fan PL, Finley E (1996) Gender and job values. Sociol. Ed. 69(1):49–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2011) Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):635–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCool JD (2008) Deciding Who Leads: How Executive Recruiters Drive, Direct and Disrupt the Global Search for Leadership Talent (Davies-Black Publishing, Mountain View, CA).Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Elder GH Jr (2006) When does social capital matter? Non-searching for jobs across the life course. Soc. Forces 85(1):521–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J (2012) Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(41):16474–16479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary VE (1974) Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psych. Bull. 81(11):809–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osberg L (1993) Fishing in different pools: Job search strategies and job finding success in Canada in the early 1980s. J. Labor Econom. 11(2):348–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Pedulla DS (2015) Race, self-selection, and the job search process. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(4):1–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Western B, Bonikowski B (2009) Discrimination in a low wage labor market: A field experiment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(5):777–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrotta P, Smith N (2013) Why so few women on boards of directors? Empirical evidence from Danish companies, 1997–2007. Discussion paper 7678, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(4):852–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I, Seidel ML (2000) Offering a job: Meritocracy and social networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):763–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polachek S (1981) Occupational self-selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 63(1):60–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Townsend B, Mattis M (1998) Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Acad. Management Executive 12(1):28–42.Google Scholar
• Reskin B (2003) Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin B, Roos P (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2014) Why status matters for inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth LM (2006) Selling Women Short: Gender and Money on Wall Street (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (1999) Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1004–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandberg S (2013) Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead (Random House Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Sardiello T (2011) Playing the matching game. An institutional analysis of executive recruitment and selection in software startups: Silicon Valley and Stockholm. Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Schweitzer L, Ng E, Lyons S, Korun L (2011) Exploring the career pipeline: Gender differences in pre-career expectation. Relations Indust. 66(3):422–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin T (2012) The gender gap in executive compensation: The role of female directors and chief executive officers. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):258–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2011) The gender pay gap in top corporate jobs in Denmark: Glass ceilings, sticky floors or both? Internat. J. Manpower 32(2):156–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2013) Why are so few females promoted into CEO and vice president positions? Danish empirical evidence, 1997–2008. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 66(2):381–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer Stuart (2014) Spencer Stuart board index. Report, Spencer Stuart, Chicago. https://www.spencerstuart.com/~/media/PDF%20Files/Research%20and%20Insight%20PDFs/SSBI2014web14Nov2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Sherman EL (2015) Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(6):1778–1808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storvik AE, Schone P (2008) In search of the glass ceiling: Gender and recruitment to management in Norway’s state bureaucracy. British J. Sociol. 59(4):729–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subich LM, Barrett G, Doverspike D, Alexander R (1989) The effects of sex-role-related factors on occupational choice and salary. Michael RT, Hartmann H, O’Farrell B, eds. Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries (National Academy Press, Washington, DC), 91–104.Google Scholar
• Tienari J, Merilainen S, Holgersson C, Bendl R (2013) And then there are none: On the exclusion of women in processes of executive search. Gender Management 28(1):43–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2010) Women in management: Analysis of female managers’ representation, characteristics, and pay. Report GAO-10-892R, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM, Sorenson O (2011) The ratings game: Asymmetry in classification. Organ. Sci. 22(3):541–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams CL (1995) Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do “Women’s Work” (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yap M, Konrad A (2009) Gender and racial differentials in promotions: Is there a sticky floor, a mid-level bottleneck, or a glass ceiling? Relations Indust. 64(4):593–619.Crossref, Google Scholar