Search for Information on Multiple Products

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2316

References

  • Bardi M, Capuzzo-Dolcetta I (2008) Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations (Birkhäuser, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Välimäki J (1996) Learning and strategic pricing. Econometrica 64(5):773–705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergman SW (1981) Acceptance sampling: The buyer’s problem. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Bolton P, Harris C (1999) Strategic experimentation. Econometrica 67(2):349–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Callander S (2011) Searching and learning by trial and error. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2277–2308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crandall MG, Ishii H, Lions PL (1992) User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 27(1):1–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond PA (1971) A model of price adjustment. J. Econom. Theory 3(2):156–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit A (1993) Art of Smooth Pasting, Vol. 55 (Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Ellison G, Ellison SF (2009) Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. Econometrica 77(2):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg FM, Huber J (1996) A theory of cutoff formation under imperfect information. Management Sci. 42(1):65–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Strzalecki T (2015) Dynamic logit with choice aversion. Econometrica 83(2):651–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Iijima R, Strzalecki T (2015a) Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Strack P, Strzalecki T (2015b) Stochastic choice and optimal sequential sampling. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittins JC (1979) Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 41(2):148–164.Google Scholar
  • Gittins JC, Glazebrook KD, Weber R (1989) Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Glazebrook KD (1979) Stoppable families of alternative bandit processes. J. Appl. Probab. 16(4):843–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guha S, Munagala K (2007) Approximation algorithms for budgeted learning problems. Proc. 39th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 104–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman MW, Shahriari B, de Freitas N (2013) Exploiting correlation and budget constraints in Bayesian multi-armed bandit optimization. Preprint, arXiv:1303.6746.Google Scholar
  • Krajbich I, Rangel A (2011) Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(33):13852–13857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A (2010) Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neurosci. 13(10):1292–1298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu L, Dukes A (2013) Consideration set formation with multiproduct firms: The case of within-firm and across-firm evaluation costs. Management Sci. 59(8):1871–1886.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCall JJ (1970) Economics of information and job search. Quart. J. Econom. 84(1):113–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moscarini G, Smith L (2001) The optimal level of experimentation. Econometrica 69(6):1629–1644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peskir G, Shiryaev A (2006) Optimal Stopping and Free-Boundary Problems (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Roberts K, Weitzman ML (1981) Funding criteria for research, development, and exploration projects. Econometrica 49(5):1261–1288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M (1974) Searching for the lowest price when the distribution of prices is unknown. J. Political Econom. 82(4):689–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson PA (1965) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Indust. Management Rev. 6(2):41–49.Google Scholar
  • Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consumer Res. 37(3):409–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vishwanath T (1988) Parallel search and information gathering. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(2):110–116.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B (1994) Selling formats for search goods. Marketing Sci. 13(3):298–309.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whittle P (1980) Multi-armed bandits and the Gittins index. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 42(2):143–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams D (1991) Probability with Martingales (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.