Risk Aversion and Wealth: Evidence from Person-to-Person Lending Portfolios

References

• Arellano M, Bonhomme S (2012) Identifying distributional characteristics in random coefficients panel data models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):987–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M (2001) Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. J. Finance 56(4):1247–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M, Thaler RH (2006) Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1069–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barseghyan L, Prince J, Teitelbaum J (2011) Are risk preferences stable across contexts? Evidence from insurance data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):591–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barseghyan L, Molinari F, O’Donoghue T, Teitelbaum J (2013) The nature of risk preferences: Evidence from insurance choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2499–2529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimball MS, Shapiro MD (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):537–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake D (1996) Efficiency, risk aversion and portfolio insurance: An analysis of financial asset portfolio held by investors in the United Kingdom. Econom. J. 106(136):1175–1192.Google Scholar
• Blume M, Friend I (1975) The demand for risky assets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 65(5):900–922.Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2012) Risk aversion and expected utility theory: An experiment with large and small stakes. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10(6):1348–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier M, Nagel S (2008) Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):713–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucks B, Kennickel A, Mach T, Moore K (2009) Changes in U.S. family finances from 2004 to 2007: Evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bull. 95:A1–A55.Google Scholar
• Buraschi A, Jiltsov A (2007) Habit formation and macroeconomic models of the term structure of interest rates. J. Finance 62(6):3009–3063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvet L, Sodini P (2014) Twin picks: Disentangling the determinants of risk-taking in household portfolios. J. Finance 69(2):867–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvet LE, Campbell JY, Sodini P (2009) Fight or flight? Portfolio rebalancing by individual investors. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):301–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Cochrane J (1999) By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. J. Political Econom. 107(2):205–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen KY, Plott C (1998) Non-linear behavior in sealed bid first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 25(1):34–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiappori P-A, Paiella M (2011) Risk aversion is constant: Evidence from panel data. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(6):1021–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiappori P-A, Gandhi A, Salanie B, Salanie F (2008) You are what you bet: Eliciting risk attitudes from horse races. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Chiappori P-A, Gandhi A, Salanie B, Salanie F (2009) Identifying preferences under risk from discrete choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):356–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi S, Fisman R, Gale D, Kariv S (2007) Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1921–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicchetti C, Dubin J (1994) A microeconomic analysis of risk aversion and the decision to self-insure. J. Political Econom. 102(11):169–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Einav L (2007) Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):745–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn RA, Lewellen WG, Lease RC, Schlarbaum GG (1975) Individual investor risk aversion and investment portfolio composition. J. Finance 30(2):605–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J, Sadiraj V (2006) Small- and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Finkelstein A, Pascu I, Cullen MR (2012) How general are risk preferences? Choice under uncertainty in different domains. Amer. Econom. Rev. 21(1):415–448.Google Scholar
• Ford J (2014) Wall Street’s siren song lures P2P lenders into treacherous seas. Financial Times (October 5), http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0b9746fc-4c83-11e4-90c1-00144feab7de.html#axzz3wK4PQgrL.Google Scholar
• Goeree J, Holt C (2004) A model of noisy introspection. Games Econom. Behav. 46(2):365–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J, Holt C, Palfrey T (2002) Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory 104(1):247–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J, Holt C, Palfrey T (2003) Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games Econom. Behav. 45(1):97–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C (2001) Wealth inequality and asset pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(1):181–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes F, Michaelides A (2008) Asset pricing with limited risk sharing and heterogeneous agents. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(1):415–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Paiella M (2008) Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(6):1109–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guvenen F (2009) A parsimonious macroeconomic model for asset pricing. Econometrica 77(6):1711–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G, Lau M, Rutstrom E (2007a) Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment. Scand. J. Econom. 109(2):341–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G, Lau M, Towe C (2007b) Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion. Econometrica 75(2):433–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer R, Khwaja A, Luttmer E, Shue K (2014) Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Jullien B, Salanie B (2000) Estimating preferences under risk: The case of racetrack bettors. J. Political Econom. 108(3):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jullien B, Salanie B (2008) Empirical evidence on the preferences of racetrack bettors. Hausch D, Ziemba B, eds. Efficiency of Sports and Lottery Markets, (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 27–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocherlakota N (1996) The equity premium: It’s still a puzzle. J. Econom. Literature 34(1):42–71.Google Scholar
• Korniotis G (2008) Habit formation, incomplete markets, and the significance of regional risk for expected returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(5):2139–2172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korniotis G, Kumar A (2011) Do older investors make better investment decisions? Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):244–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala N, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1)17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Marom D, Sade O (2013) Are the life and death of an early stage venture indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches. Working paper, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
• Menzly L, Santos T, Veronesi P (2004) Understanding predictability. J. Political Econom. 112(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morin R-A, Suarez AF (1983) Risk aversion revisited. J. Finance 38(4):1201–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polkovnichenko V (2007) Life cycle portfolio choice with additive habit formation preferences and uninsurable income risk. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(1):83–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post T, van den Assem MJ, Baltussen G, Thaler RH (2008) Deal or no deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):38–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(5):1281–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M, Thaler R (2001) Anomalies: Risk aversion. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(1):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M, Thaler R (2002) Response from Matthew Rabin and Richard H. Thaler. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(2):229–230.Google Scholar
• Ravina E (2012) Love and loans: The effect of beauty and personal characteristics in credit markets. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Santos T, Veronesi P (2010) Habit formation, the cross section of stock returns and the cash flow risk puzzle. J. Financial Econom. 98(2):385–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treynor J, Black F (1973) How to use security analysis to improve portfolio selection. J. Bus. 46(1):66–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yogo M (2008) Prices under habit formation and reference-dependent preferences. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 26(2):131–143.Crossref, Google Scholar