The Impact of Losing in a Competition on the Willingness to Seek Further Challenges

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2321

References

  • Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apicella CL, Dreber A, Möllerström J (2014) Salivary testosterone change following monetary wins and losses predicts future financial risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39:58–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M (2011) New perspectives on gender. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4B (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Hallock KF (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buser T (2012) The impact of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on competitiveness. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buser T, Dreber A (2016) The flipside of comparative payment schemes. Management Sci. 62(9):2626–2638.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buser T, Dreber A, Möllerström J (2015) Stress reactions cannot explain the gender gap in willingness to compete. Discussion paper, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  • Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3)1409–1447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardenas JC, Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2012) Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: Comparing children in Colombia and Sweden. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):11–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carré JM, Putnam SK, McCormick CM (2009) Testosterone responses to competition predict future aggressive behaviour at a cost to reward in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34(4):561–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Gneezy U, Imas A (2013) Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 87(March):43–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen DL (2010) Markets and morality: How does competition affect moral judgment. Working paper, Duke University School of Law, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  • Dechenaux E, Kovenock D, Sheremeta RM (2015) A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):609–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2014) Gender and competition in adolescence: Task matters. Experiment. Econom. 17(1):154–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck CS, Gilliard D (1975) Expectancy statements as determinants of reactions to failure: Sex differences in persistence and expectancy change. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 32(6):1077–1084.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck CS, Davidson W, Nelson S, Enna B (1978) Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychol. 14(3):268–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eil D, Rao JM (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(2):114–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliot AJ, Church MA (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 72(1):218–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliot AJ, Thrash TM (2004) The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30(8):957–971.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gill D, Prowse V (2014) Gender differences and dynamics in competition: The role of luck. Quant. Econom. 5(2):351–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Goette L, Sprenger C, Zimmermann F (2012) The limits of expectations-based reference dependence. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  • Goerg SJ, Kube S (2012) Goals (th) at work: Goals, monetary incentives, and workers’ performance. Technical report, Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Isen AM, Geva N (1987) The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(2):145–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klapper LF, Parker SC (2011) Gender and the business environment for new firm creation. World Bank Res. Observer 26(2):237–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad KA (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Köszegi B (2006) Ego utility, overconfidence, and task choice. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 4(4):673–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1047–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Legge S, Schmid L (2014) Rankings, success, and individual performance: Evidence from a natural experiment. Working paper, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Lerner JS, Keltner D (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 81(1):146–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psychologist 57(9):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lönnqvist J-E, Verkasalo M, Walkowitz G, Wichardt PC (2015) Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 119(November):254–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGregor HA, Elliot AJ (2005) The shame of failure: Examining the link between fear of failure and shame. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31(2):218–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta PH, Josephs RA (2006) Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again. Hormones Behav. 50(5):684–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mittal V, Ross WT Jr (1998) The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(3):298–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Möbius M, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblat T (2011) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Working Paper 11-14, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Yestrumskas AH (2008) Gender differences in seeking challenges: The role of institutions. NBER Working Paper 13922, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reuben E, Wiswall M, Zafar B (2013) Preferences and biases in educational choices and labor market expectations: Shrinking the black box of gender. Staff report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.Google Scholar
  • Ryckman DB, Peckham PD (1987) Gender differences in attributions for success and failure. J. Early Adolescence 7(1):47–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwerter F (2013) Social reference points and risk taking. Technical report, Bonn Econ Discussion Papers, University of Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.