Judgment Extremity and Accuracy Under Epistemic vs. Aleatory Uncertainty

References

• Arkes HR, Faust D, Guilmette TJ, Hart K (1988) Eliminating the hindsight bias. J. Appl. Psych. 73(2):305–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner LA (2003) A random support model of the calibration of subjective probabilities. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(1):87–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner L, Griffin D, Koehler DJ (2005) Modeling patterns of probability calibration with random support theory: Diagnosing case-based judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97(1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brier GW (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. 78(1):1–3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson BW (1993) The accuracy of future forecasts and past judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 54(2):245–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning D, Griffin DW, Milojkovic JD, Ross L (1990) The overconfidence effect in social prediction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(4):568–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Wallsten TS, Budescu DV (1994) Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psych. Rev. 101(3):519–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Beyth R (1975) I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 13(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Bruine De Bruin W (1999) Fifty–fifty = 50%? J. Behav. Decision Making 12(2):149–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitts PM, Seeger CM (1953) S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. J. Experiment. Psych. 46(3):199–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR (1999) Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):167–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Clemen RT (2005) Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Sci. 51(9):1417–1432.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Rottenstreich Y (2003) Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty. Psych. Sci. 14(3):195–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Tversky A (1998) A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. 44(7):879–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Ülkümen G (2011) Distinguishing two dimensions of uncertainty. Brun W, Keren G, Kirkebøen G, Montgomery H, eds. Perspectives on Thinking, Judging, and Decision Making: A Tribute to Karl Halvor Teigen (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, Norway), 21–35.Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Tannenbaum D, Ülkümen G (2016) The empirical case for distinguishing two dimensions of subjective uncertainty. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Gaissmaier W, Schooler LJ (2008) The smart potential behind probability matching. Cognition 109(3):416–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin G, Darlow A (2013) TurkGate (version 0.4.0). [Software.] Retreived December 12, 2012, http://gideongoldin.github.io/TurkGate/.Google Scholar
• Goodnow JJ (1955) Determinants of choice-distribution in two-choice situations. Amer. J. Psych. 68(1):106–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin D, Tversky A (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psych. 24(3):411–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin DW, Dunning D, Ross L (1990) The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(6):1128–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacking I (1975) The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Herrnstein RJ (1997) The Matching Law: Papers in Psychology and Economics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ (1985) Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 11(4):719–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell WC, Kerkar SP (1982) A test of task influences in uncertainty measurement. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 30(3):365–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iachine I, Petersen HC, Kyvik KO (2010) Robust tests for the equality of variances for clustered data. J. Statist. Comput. Simulation 80(4):365–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G (1991) Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psych. 77(3):217–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klayman J, Soll JB, González-Vallejo C, Barlas S (1999) Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 79(3):216–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler DJ (1996) A strength model of probability judgments for tournaments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 66(1):16–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1980) Reasons for confidence. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learn. Memory 6(2):107–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. Olkin I, ed. Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Vol. 2 (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA), 278–292.Google Scholar
• Liberman V, Tversky A (1993) On the evaluation of probability judgments: Calibration, resolution, and monotonicity. Psych. Bull. 114(1):162–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips LD (1982) Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York), 306–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH (1973) A new vector partition of the probability score. J. Appl. Meteorol. 12(4):595–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6):619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson EJ, Rowley MG, Beck SR, Carroll DJ, Apperly IA (2006) Children’s sensitivity to their own relative ignorance: Handling of possibilities under epistemic and physical uncertainty. Child Development 77(6):1642–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronis DL, Yates JF (1987) Components of probability judgment accuracy: Individual consistency and effects of subject matter and assessment method. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 40(2):193–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y, Tversky A (1997) Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psych. Rev. 104(2):406–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• See KE, Fox CR, Rottenstreich YS (2006) Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 32(6):1385–1402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psych. Sci. 22(11):1359–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smithson M, Verkuilen J (2006) A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psych. Methods 11(1):54–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenney ER, MacCoun RJ, Spellman BA, Hastie R (2007) Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psych. Sci. 18(1):46–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y (1978) Inferences of personal characteristics on the basis of information retrieved from one’s memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(2):93–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Koehler DJ (1994) Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. 101(4):547–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ülkümen G, Fox CR, Malle BF (2016) Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language. J. Experiment. Psych.: General. 145(10):1280–1297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unturbe J, Corominas J (2007) Probability matching involves rule-generating ability: A neuropsychological mechanism dealing with probabilities. Neuropsychology 21(5):621–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volz KG, Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2004) Why am I unsure? Internal and external attributions of uncertainty dissociated by fMRI. Neuroimage 21(3):848–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volz KG, Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2005) Variants of uncertainty in decision-making and their neural correlates. Brain Res. Bull. 67(5):403–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Mises R (1957) Probability, Statistics, and Truth (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Wickens CD (1992) Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 2nd ed. (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Wolford G, Newman SE, Miller MB, Wig GS (2004) Searching for patterns in random sequences. Canadian J. Experiment. Psych. 58(4):221–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright G (1982) Changes in the realism and distribution of probability assessments as a function of question type. Acta Psych. 52(1):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright G, Ayton P (1987) Task influences on judgemental forecasting. Scand. J. Psych. 28(2):115–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright G, Wisudha A (1982) Distribution of probability assessments for almanac and future event questions. Scand. J. Psych. 23(1):219–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates JF (1982) External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 30(1):132–156.Crossref, Google Scholar