Intertemporal Uncertainty Avoidance: When the Future Is Uncertain, People Prefer the Present, and When the Present Is Uncertain, People Prefer the Future

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349

References

  • Ahlbrecht M, Weber M (1997) An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Sci. 43(6):813–826.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderhub V, Guth W, Gneezy U, Sonsino D (2001) On the interaction of risk and time preferences: An experimental study. German Econom. Rev. 2(3):239–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson LR, Stafford SL (2009) Individual decision-making experiments with risk and intertemporal choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(1):51–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bixter MT, Luhmann CC (2015) Evidence for implicit risk: Delay facilitates the processing of uncertainty information. J. Behav. Decision Making 28(4):347–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackburn M, El-Deredy W (2013) The future is risky: Discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes. Behav. Processes 94:9–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epper T, Fehr-Duda H, Bruhin A (2011) Viewing the future through a warped lens: Why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting. J. Risk Uncertainty 43(3):169–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Estle SJ, Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD (2006) Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory Cognition 34(4):914–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Estle SJ, Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD (2007) Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psych. Sci. 18(1):58–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L, Myerson J (2004) A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psych. Bull. 130(5):769–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P (1999) Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 25(2):418–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardisty DJ, Weber EU (2009) Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. J. Experiment. Psych. General 138(3):329–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hershey JC, Schoemaker PJ (1980) Prospect theory’s reflection hypothesis: A critical examination. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 25(3):395–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones BA, Rachlin H (2009) Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 91(1):61–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keren G, Roelofsma P (1995) Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 63(3):287–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur JE (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Commons ML, Mazure JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H, eds. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, Vol. 5, The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 55–73.Google Scholar
  • Mischel W, Grusec J (1967) Waiting for rewards and punishments: Effects of time and probability on choice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 5(1):24–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell SH, Wilson VB (2010) The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses. Behav. Processes 83(1):36–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):867–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patak M, Reynolds B (2007) Question-based assessments of delay discounting: Do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards? Addictive Behav. 32(2):351–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1991) Decision-making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. 37(7):770–786.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rachlin H, Raineri A (1992) Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. Loewenstein G, Elster J, eds. Choice Over Time (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 93–118.Google Scholar
  • Rachlin H, Brown J, Cross D (2000) Discounting in judgments of delay and probability. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(2):145–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D (1991) Subjective probability and delay. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 55(2):233–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reynolds B, Patak M, Shroff P (2007) Adolescent smokers rate delayed rewards as less certain than adolescent nonsmokers. Drug Alcohol Dependence 90(2–3):301–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richards JB, Zhang L, Mitchell SH, Wit H (1999) Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: Effect of alcohol. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 71(2):121–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4:155–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shead NW, Hodgins DC (2009) Probability discounting of gains and losses: Implications for risk attitudes and impulsivity. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 92(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shelley MK (1994) Gain/loss asymmetry in risky intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 59(1):124–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takahashi T, Ikeda K, Hasegawa T (2007) A hyperbolic decay of subjective probability of obtaining delayed rewards. Behav. Brain Functions 3:52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. 8:201–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber BJ, Chapman GB (2005) The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):104–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.