When Suppliers Climb the Value Chain: A Theory of Value Distribution in Vertical Relationships

References

• Alcácer J, Oxley J (2014) Learning by supplying. Strategic Management J. 35(2):204–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Zenger TR (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arruñada B, Vázquez XH (2006) When your contract manufacturer becomes your competitor. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(9):135–145.Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (2000) Going global: Lessons from late movers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(2):132–142.Google Scholar
• Bönte W, Wiethaus L (2007) Knowledge disclosure and transmission in buyer-supplier relationships. Rev. Indust. Organ. 31(4):275–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budd C, Harris C, Vickers J (1993) A model of the evolution of duopoly: Does the asymmetry between firms tend to increase or decrease? Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):543–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byford MC, Gans JS (2014a) Exit deterrence. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(3):650–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byford MC, Gans JS (2014b) Permission to exist. NBER Working Paper 20512, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral LMB (2002) Increasing dominance with no efficiency effect. J. Econom. Theory 102(2):471–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral LMB (2014) Introduction to Industrial Organizationl, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chatain O (2011) Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management J. 32(1):76–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O, Zemsky P (2007) The horizontal scope of the firm: Organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Sci. 53(4):550–565.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Fontenay CC, Gans JS (2008) A bargaining perspective on strategic outsourcing and supply competition. Strategic Management J. 29(8):819–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Elms DK, Patrick L (2013) Global Value Chains in a Changing World (World Trade Organization Publications, Geneva).Google Scholar
• Feenstra RC (1998) Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(4):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs E, Kirchain R (2010) Design for location? The impact of manufacturing offshore on technology competitiveness in the optoelectronics industry. Management Sci. 56(12):2323–2349.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Gilbert R, Stiglitz J, Tirole J (1983) Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. Eur. Econom. Rev. 22(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS (2014) Negotiating for the market. NBER Working Paper 20559, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2000) Incumbency and R&D incentives: Licensing the gale of creative destruction. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):485–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. 12(1):78–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Newbery DMG (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):514–526.Google Scholar
• Grossman G, Shapiro C (1986) Optimal dynamic r&d programs. RAND J. Econom. 17(4):581–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Helpman E (2005) Outsourcing in a global economy. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(1):135–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison A, Scorse J (2010) Multinationals and anti-sweatshop activism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):247–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Javorcik BS (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):605–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia N (2013) Competition, governance, and relationship-specific investments: Theory and implications for strategy. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1551–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang M-P, Mahoney JT, Tan D (2009) Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: The case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management J. 30(2):117–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu KG (2006) Emerging giants: Building world-class companies in developing countries. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):60–69.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19(3):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Econom. Activity 3:783–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman S, Rumelt R (1982) Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):418–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDonald GM, Ryall M (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ (2006) Spillovers and governance: An analysis of knowledge and reputational spillovers in information technology. Acad. Management J. 49(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran TH (2001) Parental Supervision: The New Paradigm for Foreign Direct Investment and Development (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Zemsky PB (2007) The timing of resource development and sustainable competitive advantage. Management Sci. 53(4):651–666.Link, Google Scholar
• Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Zemsky PB (2012) Some like it free: Innovators’ strategic use of disclosure to slow down competition. Strategic Management J. 33(7):773–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pack H, Saggi K (2001) Vertical technology transfer via international outsourcing. J. Development Econom. 65(2):389–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paik Y, Zhu F (2014) The impact of patent wars on firm strategy: Evidence from the global smartphone market. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Pisano G, Shih W (2009) Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(7/8):114–125.Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1983) Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(4):741–748.Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Segal I, Whinston MD (2007) Antitrust in innovative industries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1703–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J (2012) Competing in Capabilities: The Globalization Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2011) World investment report 2011: Non-equity modes of international production and development. Report, UNCTAD, Geneva. http://unctad.org/en/docs/wir2011_embargoed_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wakeman S (2010) Profiting from technological capabilities: Technology commercialization strategy in a dynamic context. ESMT Working Paper 08-008(R2), European School of Management and Technology, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson PJ, Raman AP (2011) How China reset its global acquisition agenda. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(14):109–114.Google Scholar
• Winter SG (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. Teece D, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA), 159–184.Google Scholar
• Yoffie DB, Alcacer J, Kim R (2012) HTC Corp. in 2012. HBS Case 712-423, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Zeng M, Williamson PJ (2003) The hidden dragons. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(10):92–99.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansit M (2011) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar