It’s a Man’s Job: Income and the Gender Gap in Industrial Research

References

• Aguero JM, Marks MS (2008) Motherhood and female labor force participation: Evidence from infertility shocks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):500–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ, Katz R (1986) The dual ladder: Motivational solution or managerial delusion? R&D Management 16(2):185–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity, Vol. 11 (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson DJ, Binder M, Krause K (2003) The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 56(2):273–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Evans W (1998) Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):450–477.Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2003) Women Don’t Ask (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Gelfand M, Small D, Stayn H (2006) Gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations. Crèmer DD, Zeelenberg M, Murnighan JK, eds. Social Psychology and Economics (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 239–259.Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1971) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, 2nd ed. (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1985) Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. J. Labor Econom. 3(1):33–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell A, Chetty R, Jaravel X, Petkova N, Van Reenen J (2015) The lifecycle of inventors. Working paper, Havard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Berger J, Norman RZ, Balkwell JW, Smith RF (1992) Status inconsistency in task situations: A test of four status processing principles. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(6):843–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2000) Gender differences in pay. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):75–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom DE, Canning D, Fink G, Finlay JE (2009) Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. J. Econom. Growth 14(2):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bressler M, Westoff CF (1963) Catholic education, economic values, and achievement. Amer. J. Sociol. 69(3):225–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brett JM, Stroh LK (2003) Working 61 plus hours a week: Why do managers do it? J. Appl. Psych. 88(1):67–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronars SG, Grogger J (1994) The economic consequences of unwed motherhood: Using twin births as a natural experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1141–56.Google Scholar
• Bun MJG, Harrison TD (2014) OLS and IV estimation of regression models including endogenous interaction terms. Discussion paper, Department of Econometrics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butz WP, Ward MP (1979) Baby boom and baby bust: A new view. Amer. Demographics 1(8):11–1.Google Scholar
• Carli LL (2010) Gender and group behavior. Christler JC, McCreary DR, eds. Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, Vol. 2 (Springer, New York), 337–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies M-P (2012) Men too sometimes shy away from competition: The case of team competition. Management Sci. 58(11):1982–2000.Link, Google Scholar
• Datta Gupta N, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Econom. Inquiry 51(1):816–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Rassenfosse G, Hoisl K (2015) Knowledge fit and the productivity gain from employee mobility. Working paper, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• De Solla Price DJ (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27(5):292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313(5787):665–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Pinnelli A (2004) Demographic characteristics and family life. Current Sociol. 52(3):339–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles JS (1994) Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. Psych. Women Quart. 18(4):585–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2014) Nice work if you can get out. Why the rich now have less leisure than the poor. (April 19), http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21600989-why-rich-now-have-less-leisure-poor-nice-work-if-you-can-get-out.Google Scholar
• England P (1992) Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence (Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY).Google Scholar
• England P, Herbert M, Stanek Kilbourne B, Reid L, McCreary Megdal L (1994) The gendered valuation of occupation and skills: Earnings in the 1980 census occupations. Soc. Forces 73:65–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2009/2011) The situation in the EU. Accessed August 7, 2013, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-pay-gap/situation-europe/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
• Feierman JR, ed. (2009) The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion (Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA).Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, King Z (2011) Anticipatory sorting and gender segregation in temporary employment. Management Sci. 57(6):989–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive work places deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on gender differences in job-entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frejka T, Westhoff CF (2008) Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and Europe. Eur. J. Population 24:5–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Harhoff D (2011) Inventive step in European patent applications. Evidence from an Inventor Survey. Mimeo, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
• Ginther DK (2004) Why women earn less: Economic explanations for the gender salary gap in science. AWIS Magazine 33(1):1–5.Google Scholar
• Ginther DK, Kahn S (2006) Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973–2001. NBER Working Paper 12691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guellec D, van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B (2000) Applications, grants and the value of patent. Econom. Lett. 69(1):109–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2003) People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. J. Monetary Econom. 50(1):225–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutteridge TG (1973) Predicting career success of graduate business school alumni. Acad. Management J. 16:129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackett C, Stonawski M, Potancokova M, Grim BJ (2015) The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations. Demographic Res. 32(27):829–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2007) Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity—Patent value and the German employees’ invention act. Res. Policy 36(8):1143–1162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Scherer FM, Vopel K (2003) Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights—Evidence from Germany. Res. Policy 32:1343–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(3):511–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayford SR, Morgan SP (2008) Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Soc. Forces 86(3):1163–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaton TB (2011) Does religion influence fertility in developing countries. Population Res. Policy Rev. 30(3):449–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heintzman P, Mannell RC (2003) Spiritual functions of leisure and spiritual well-being: Coping with time pressure. Leisure Sci. 25(2–3):207–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellerstein JK, Neumark D, Troske KR (1996) Wages, productivity and worker characteristics: Evidence from plant-level production functions and wage equations. NBER Working Paper 5626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill M (1979) The wage effect of marital status and children. J. Human Resources 14(4):579–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt J (2016) Why do women leave science and engineering? ILR Rev. 69(1):199–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Garant JG, Herman H, Munroe DJ (2013) Why are women underrepresented amongst patentees? Res. Policy 42(4):831–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang H-s, Reed WR, Hubbard C (1992) Compensating wage differentials and unobserved productivity. J. Political Econom. 100(4):835–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iannaccone LR (1998) Introduction to the economics of religion. J. Econom. Literature 36(3):1465–1495.Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Welzel C (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Institute for Women’s Policy Research (2009) The gender wage gap 2009. Accessed August 7, 2013, http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/the-gender-wage-gap-2009.Google Scholar
• Jejeebhoy SJ (1995) Women’s Education, Autonomy, and Reproductive Behavior: Experience from Developing Countries (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2010) Age and great invention. Rev. Econom. Statist. 92(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A (2014) By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn S (1993) Gender differences in academic career paths for economists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(2):52–65.Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans S, Veugelers R (2013) Top research productivity and its persistence: Gender as a double-edged sword. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(1):273–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilbourne BS, England P, Farkas G, Beron K, Weir D (1994) Returns to skill, compensating differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of white women and men. Amer. J. Sociol. 100:689–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King PE, Furrow JL, Roth N (2002) The influence of families and peers on adolescent religiousness. J. Psych. Christianity 21(2):109–120.Google Scholar
• Korenman S, Neumar D (1992) Marriage, motherhood, and wages. J. Human Resources 27(2):233–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krapf M, Ursprung HW, Zimmermann C (2014) Parenthood and productivity of highly skilled labor: Evidence from the groves of academe. Working Paper 2014-001A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Lazear E (1976) Age, experience and wage growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66:548–558.Google Scholar
• Lehrer EL (1996) Religion as a determinant of martial fertility. J. Population Econom. 9:173–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Sci. 61(9):2016–2024.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner G (2004) US women’s history: Past, present, and future. J. Women’s History 16(4):10–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leszczensky M, Cordes A, Kerst C, Meister T, Wespel J (2013) Bildung und Qualifikation als Grundlage der technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands (Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Levin SG, Stephan PE (1998) Gender differences in the rewards to publishing in academe: Science in the 1970s. Sex Roles 38(11/12):1049–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long S, Allison P, McGinnis R (1993) Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 58(5):703–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loprest PJ (1992) Gender differences in wage growth and job mobility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(2):526–532.Google Scholar
• McQuillan K (2004) When does religion influence fertility? Population Development Rev. 30(1):25–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller A (2011) The effects of motherhood timing on career path. J. Population Econom. 24(3):1071–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller AS, Hoffmann JP (1995) Risk and religion: An explanation of gender differences in religiosity. J. Scientific Study of Religion 34:63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mincer J (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, Human Behavior and Social Institutions, No. 2 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Murphy KM, Welch F (1990) Empirical age-earning profiles. J. Labor Econom. 8:202–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narin F, Breitzman A (1995) Inventive productivity. Res. Policy 24(4):507–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122:1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1994) Using Patent Data as Science and Technological Indicators (OECD, Paris), http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/2095942.pdf.Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1999) Classifying Education Programmes (OECD, Paris). Accessed on July 7, 2015, http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/1962350.pdf.Google Scholar
• Oi WY, Idson TL (1999) Firm size and wages. Handbook of Labor Econom. 3(3):2165–2214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osoba E (2003) Women in management and decision-making processes in Antigua and Barbuda: A statistical analysis. University of the West Indies, Antigua and Barbuda Country Conference. http://www.open.uwi.edu/sites/default/files/bnccde/antigua/conference/papers/osoba.html.Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Morgan LA (1995) Separate and unequal: Occupation-establishment sex segregation and the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(2):329–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam J (1996) The value of international patent rights. Dissertation thesis, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Smith-Lovin L (1999) The gender system and interaction. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:191–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5):71–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49:751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rowthorn R (2011) Religion, fertility and genes: A dual inheritance model. Proc. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 278(1717):2519–2527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, Zimmermann KF (1991) Work characteristics, firm size, and wages. Rev. Econom. Statist. 73:705–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siebert WS, Sloane PJ (1981) The measurement of sex and marital status discrimination at the workplace. Economica 48:125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J, Pyun L, Cheon BY (2014) Multinational firms, labor market discrimination, and the capture of competitive advantage by exploiting the social divide. HBS Working Paper 11-011, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49:351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Stavrova O, Siegers P (2013) Religious prosociality and morality across cultures: How social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on prosocial and moral attitudes and behaviors. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(10):1–19.Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stone P (2008) Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2006) Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Res. Policy 35:1131–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toivanen O, Väänänen L (2012) Returns to inventors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(4):1173–1190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-Devey D (1993) The gender and race composition of jobs and the male/female, white/black pay gaps. Soc. Forces 72:45–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topel RH, Ward PW (1992) Job mobility and the careers of young men. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):439–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui L (1998) The effects of gender, education, and personal skills self-confidence on income in business managers. Sex Roles 38:363–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V.) (2010) European engineering report. Accessed August 7, 2013, http://www.vdi.de/uploads/media/2010-04_IW_European_Engineering_Report_02.pdf.Google Scholar
• Waite LJ, Stolzenberg RM (1976) Intended childbearing and labor force participation of young women: Insights from non-recursive models. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):235–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Nagaoka S (2009) Who invents? Evidence from the Japan & US inventor survey. RIETI Discussion Paper 09-E-034, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Tokyo.Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer D, Winter-Ebmer R (2005) A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. J. Econom. Surveys 19(3):479–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wetzels C, Zorlu A (2003) Wage effects of motherhood: A double selection approach. NIMA Working Paper 22, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2008) Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female fertility. Demographic Res. 18(8):233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar