Does Gender Diversity Promote Nonconformity?
Published Online:25 Mar 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2382
References
- (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127:137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58:78–93.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76:451–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The Social Animal, 9th ed. (Worth, New York).Google Scholar
- (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. Guetzkow H, ed. Groups, Leadership, and Men (Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh), 76–92.Google Scholar
- (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psych. Monogr. 70(9):1–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1957) An experimental investigation of group influence. Walter Reed Army Institute Res., Sympos. Preventive Soc. Psychiatry (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), 15–17.Google Scholar
- (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 197:797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71:915–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1954) Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations 7:509–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102:841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascade. J. Political Econom. 100:992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psych. Bull. 119:111–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Behavioral Game Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- (1999) The effects of financial incentives in economic experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty 18:7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90:414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 151–192.Google Scholar
- Corporate Women Directors International (2014) Corporate Women Directors International 2014 report: Women board directors of Fortune Global 200. Accessed March 18, 2016, https://enterprisingwomen.com/enterprising-women-archived-blog-posts/2014-cwdi-report-women-board-directors-of-fortune-global-200-2004-2014.Google Scholar
- (1955) Conformity and character. Amer. Psychologist 10:191–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 51:629–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Is liking contagious? Working paper, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Egon Zehnder (2014) 2014 Egon Zehnder European Board Diversity Analysis. Accessed March 18, 2016, http://www.egonzehnder.com/files/2014_egon_zehnder_european_board_diversity_analysis.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2005) Gender and jury deliberations: The contributions of social science. William Mary J. Women Law 12(1):Article 2.Google Scholar
- (1971) Primary groups, organizations, and military performance. Little RW, ed. Handbook of Military Institutions (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 293–318.Google Scholar
- (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115:791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25:191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Conformity in the lab. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1:15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Self-correcting informational cascades. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74:733–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91:281–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Attitude change during college: Normative or informational social influence? Soc. Psych. Ed. 2:237–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:208–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral Brain Sci. 24:383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The impact of gender diversity on team performance. Management Sci. 59:1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
- House of Commons Treasury Committee (2010) Women in the city—Tenth report of Session 2009–10. Report, Treasury Committee, House of Commons, London. http://www.publicationsa.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmtreasy/482/482.pdf.Google Scholar
- Inter-Parliamentary Union (2015) Women in national parliaments: Situation as of 1st January 2015. Accessed March 4, 2015, http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm.Google Scholar
- (2004) Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Appl. Psych. 53:136–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Development of strategic norms in groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82:88–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1961) Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 62:408–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) One swallow does not make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104:277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Social Influence (Hodder & Stoughton, London).Google Scholar
- (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) Group membership, sex composition of the group, and conformity behavior. J. Soc. Psych. 64:45–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Gender composition and group cohesion in U.S. Army units: A comparison across five studies. Armed Forces Soc. 25:365–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Herd behavior and investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80:465–479.Google Scholar
- (1936) The Psychology of Social Norms (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
- (1967) Suspicion of deception: Implications for conformity research. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 5:379–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) The role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self-doubt in conformity. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 13:217–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1958) The influence of the sex composition of the group upon yielding to a distorted norm. J. Psych. 46:243–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- United Kingdom, Parliament (2010) Treasury Committee report on women in the city: The Government’s response. Cm. 7900 (July 2010). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/238394/7900.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1998) Diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
- (1985) Manifest and latent influence of majorities and minorities. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48:899–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Social Influences (Taylor & Francis/Routledge, London).Google Scholar
- (1966) Effects on incentive to perform well, group attraction and group acceptance on conformity in a judgmental task. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 6:255–263.Crossref, Google Scholar

