Do Earnings Estimates Add Value to Sell-Side Analysts’ Investment Recommendations?
Published Online:20 Apr 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2385
References
- (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. J. Financial Markets 5:31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Overreaction and underreaction in analysts’ forecasts. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 37:333–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Information content of equity analyst reports. J. Financial Econom. 75:245–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst recommendations and stock returns. J. Finance 56:531–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Do analysts practice what they preach and should investors listen? Effects of recent regulations. Accounting Rev. 84:1015–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Post-earnings-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium? J. Accounting Res. 27:1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 13:305–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Analysts, industries, and price momentum. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 41:85–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) How do analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations? Accounting Rev. 79:25–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Using expectations to test asset pricing models. Financial Management 34:31–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Growth or glamour? Fundamentals and systematic risk in stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:305–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The level and persistence of growth rates. J. Finance 58:643–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. J. Finance 56:2431–2456.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) NASD Rule 2711 and changes in analysts’ independence in making stock recommendations. Accounting Rev. 84:1041–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) What drives stock price movement? Rev. Financial Stud. 26:841–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Why so much error in analysts’ earnings forecasts? Financial Anal. J. 54:35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The value spread. J. Finance 58:609–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Market reactions to tangible and intangible information. J. Finance 61:1605–1643.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks. J. Finance 52:1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J. Financial Econom. 101:621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Discrete expectational data and portfolio performance. J. Finance 41:699–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Are the Wall Street analyst rankings popularity contests? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 44:411–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Are stars’ opinions worth more? The relation between analyst reputation and recommendation values. J. Financial Services Res. 46:235–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The relative informativeness of analysts’ stock recommendations and earnings forecast revisions. J. Accounting Res. 35:193–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) The psychology of moderate prediction: II. Leniency and uncertainty. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 48:169–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The effectiveness of Regulation FD. J. Accounting Econom. 37:293–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1959) Dividends, earnings and stock prices. Rev. Econom. Statist. 41:99–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The value of client access to analyst recommendations. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 41:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. J. Finance 58:313–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. J. Financial Econom. 39:181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Analyzing the analysts: When do recommendations add value? J. Finance 59:1083–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Conflicts of interest and stock recommendations: The effects of the global settlement and related regulations. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:4189–4217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Analysts’ industry expertise. J. Accounting Econom. 54:95–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) What are analysts really good at? Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar
- (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 21:107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Underwriting relationships, analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. 25:101–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Conflicts of interest in sell-side research and the moderating role of institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 85:420–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When are analyst recommendation changes influential? Rev. Financial Stud. 24:593–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Is sell-side research more valuable in bad times? NBER Working Paper 19778, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) The new issues puzzle. J. Finance 50:23–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Self-selection and analyst coverage. J. Accounting Res. 35:167–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Conflicts of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Rev. Financial Stud. 12:653–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) The anatomy of the performance of buy and sell recommendations. Financial Analysts J. 51:25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Do brokerage analysts’ recommendations have investment value? J. Finance 51:137–167.Crossref, Google Scholar

