Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2411

References

  • Alder S, Ambrose M (2005) Feedback’s influence on the perceived fairness of computer performance monitoring: An empirical investigation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97:161–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ambady N, Rosenthal R (1993) Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64:431–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker J, Cameron M (1996) The effects of the service environment on affect and consumer perception of waiting time: An integrative review and research propositions. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 24:338–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartlett MY, DeSteno D (2006) Gratitude and prosocial behavior. Psych. Sci. 17:319–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden W, Teel J (1983) Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. J. Marketing Res. 20:21–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. 75:493–517.Google Scholar
  • Benjamin DJ, Shapiro JM (2009) Thin-slice forecasts of gubernatorial elections. Rev. Econom. Statist. 91:523–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57:181–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding W, Kalra A, Staelin R, Zeithaml VA (1993) A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. J. Marketing Res. 30:7–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SP, Leigh TW (1996) A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 81:358–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57:1564–1579.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6:3–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke L, Logsdon JM (1996) How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning 29:495–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Stat. 90:414–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chalykoff J, Kochan TA (1989) Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personality Psych. 42:807–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chase RB (1978) Where does the customer fit in a service operation? Harvard Bus. Rev. 56(6):137–142.Google Scholar
  • Chase RB (1981) The customer contact approach to services: Theoretical bases and practical extensions. Oper. Res. 29:698–706.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chassin MR, Galvin RW (1998) The urgent need to improve health care quality: Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 280:1000–1005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chinander KR, Schweitzer ME (2003) The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91:243–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Churchill GA Jr, Surprenant C (1982) An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. 4:491–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: Science and Practice, Book (Allyn & Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Acad. Management Rev. 13:471–482.Google Scholar
  • Cronin JJ Jr, Taylor SA (1992) Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. J. Marketing 56:55–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K, Howison J, Annabi H (2006) Information systems success in free and open source software development: Theory and measures. Software Process Improvement Practice 11:123–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG (2011) Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Account. Rev. 86:59–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2007) Convergence of interests-cultivating consumer trust through corporate social initiatives. Adv. Consumer Res. 34:687.Google Scholar
  • Edwards CD (1968) The meaning of quality. Quality Progress 1:36–39.Google Scholar
  • Fast NJ, Burris ER, Bartel CA (2014) Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 57:1013–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Westbrook RA (1979) An exploratory study of assertiveness, aggressiveness, and consumer complaining behavior. Adv. Consumer Res. 6:105–111.Google Scholar
  • Fournier S (1998) Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 24:343–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Keinz P, Klausberger K (2013) “Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organ. Sci. 24:1495–1516.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friedrich J, Barnes P, Chapin K, Dawson I, Garst V, Kerr D (1999) Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. J. Consumer Psych. 8:277–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garvin DA (1984) What does “product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Rev. 26:25–43.Google Scholar
  • Gilmore HL (1974) Product conformance cost. Quality Progress 7:16–19.Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Shu LL, Bazerman MH (2010) Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111:93–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GLG Research/Emerging Markets Institute (2012) Foodservice industry trends in emerging markets. Joint survey by Gerson Lehrman Group, New York and Emerging Markets Institute, Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  • Grant AM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Management Rev. 32:393–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Campbell EM, Chen G, Cottone K, Lapedis D, Lee K (2007) Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103:53–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gremler DD, Gwinner KP (2000) Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. J. Service Res. 3:82–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Coutu D (2009) Why teams don’t work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(5):98–105.Google Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Wageman R (2004) When and how team leaders matter. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:37–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall AT, Royle TM, Brymer RA, Perrewé PL, Ferris GR, Hochwarter WA (2006) Relationships between felt accountability as a stressor and strain reactions: The neutralizing role of autonomy across two studies. J. Occupational Health Psychol. 11:87–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR, Gavin MB, Perrewé PL, Hall AT, Frink DD (2007) Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability—Job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102:226–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2008) Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. J. Labor Econom. 26:101–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jha AK (2006) Measuring hospital quality: What physicians do? How patients fare? Or both? J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 296:95–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kc DS, Terwiesch C (2009) Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Sci. 55:1486–1498.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kruger J, Wirtz D, Van Boven L, Altermatt TW (2004) The effort heuristic. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:91–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lo K (2003) Economic consequences of regulated changes in disclosure: The case of executive compensation. J. Accounting Econom. 35:285–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra D, Bazerman M (2007) Conflicts of interest. Leadership Excellence 24:16.Google Scholar
  • Mason W, Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44:1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mattila AS (2001) The effectiveness of service recovery in a multi-industry setting. J. Service Marketing 15:583–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mauborgne R, Kim W (1997) Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(4):65–75.Google Scholar
  • McDougall GHG, Levesque T (2000) Customer satisfaction with services: Putting perceived value into the equation. J. Service Marketing 14:392–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohr LA, Bitner MJ (1995) The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions. J. Bus. Res. 32:239–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morales AC (2005) Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. J. Consumer Res. 31:806–812.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Restaurant Association (2015) 2015 facts at a glance. Accessed October 2015, http://www.restaurant.org/News-Research/Research/Facts-at-a-Glance.Google Scholar
  • Neergaard L, Caruso DB (2014) Ebola: NY had jump-start, Dallas had to learn fast. NBC4 New York (October 25), http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/Ebola-NY-Had-Jump-Start-Dallas-Had-to-Learn-Fast-280409322.html.Google Scholar
  • Oldham GR, Hackman R (1980) Work design in the organizational context. Res. Organ. Behav. 2:247–248.Google Scholar
  • Oliva R, Sterman JD (2001) Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Sci. 47:894–914.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pan Y, Zinkhan GM (2006) Exploring the impact of online privacy disclosures on consumer trust. J. Retailing 82:331–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing 49:41–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N (2013) From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psych. Sci. 24:1986–1994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regan DT (1971) Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 7:627–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers T, Frey E (2015) Changing behavior beyond the here and now. Kegen G, Wu G, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, Chap. 25 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L, Stillinger C (1991) Barriers to conflict resolution. Negotiation J. 7:389–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruiz-Quintanilla A, England GW, Wiley J (1996) How working is defined: Structure and stability. J. Organ. Behav. 17:515–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rule NO, Ambady N (2008) The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psych. Sci. 19:109–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rusbult CE (1979) Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 16:172–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small DA, Loewenstein G (2005) The devil you know: The effects of identifiability on punishment. J. Behav. Decision Making 18:311–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiro R, Perrault W, Reynolds F (1977) The personal selling process: A critical review and model. Indust. Marketing Management 5:351–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann D, Milkman KL (2017) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1563–1585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sweeney JC, Soutar GN (2001) Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retailing 77:203–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tansik DA, Chase RB (1983) The customer contact model for organization design. Management Sci. 29:1037–1050.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Thoms P, Dose JJ, Scott KS (2002) Relationships between accountability, job satisfaction, and trust. Human Resource Development Quart. 13:307–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tidd KL, Lockard JS (1978) Monetary significance of the affiliative smile: A case for reciprocal altruism. Bull. Psych. Soc. 11:344–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2010) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22:254–268.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay C-J (2013) Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:14580–14585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay C-J (2014) The vision heuristic: Judging music ensembles by sight alone. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124:24–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tse D, Wilton P (1988) Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. J. Marketing 25:204–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walfried L, Manolis C, Winsor RD (2000) Service quality perspectives and satisfaction in private banking. J. Services Marketing 14:244–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (2004) Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services. J. Bus. Res. 57:445–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zweig D, Webster J (2002) Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. J. Organ. Behav. 23:605–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.