The Surprising Effectiveness of Hostile Mediators

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2431

References

  • Allred KG, Mallozzi JS, Matsui F, Raia CP (1997) The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(3):175–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(4):596–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bastian B, Jetten J, Ferris LJ (2014) Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psych. Sci. 25(11):2079–2085.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beardsley KC, Quinn DM, Biswas B, Wilkenfeld J (2006) Mediation style and crisis outcomes. J. Conflict Resolution 50(1):58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bercovitch J, Anagnoson JT, Wille DL (1991) Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. J. Peace Res. 28(1):7–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bosson JK, Johnson AB, Niederhoffer K, Swann WB (2006) Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others. Personal Relationships 13(2):135–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. 86(2):307–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buss AH (1961) The Psychology of Aggression (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale PJD, Conlon DE (1988) Time pressure and strategic choice in mediation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 42(1):111–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale PJD, Lawler EJ (1986) Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. J. Conflict Resolution 30(4):636–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale PJD, Pruitt DG (1992) Negotiation and mediation. Annual Rev. Psych. 43(1):531–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Côté S (2005) A social interaction model of the effects of emotion regulation on work strain. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):509–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P (2008) Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 40 (Academic Press, New York), 61–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW (2010) Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 983–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW (2011) Conflict at Work: Basic Principles and Applied Issues (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Beersma B, Stroebe K, Euwema MC (2006) Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(6):927–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunn EW, Aknin LB, Norton MI (2008) Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science 319(5870):1687–1688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyrlund AK, Wininger SR (2006) An evaluation of barrier efficacy and cognitive evaluation theory as predictors of exercise attendance. J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 11(3–4):133–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 7(2):136–150.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford PD (2006) Got conflict? Mr. Ahtisaari is your man. Christian Sci. Monitor (May 4), http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0504/p01s04-wogi.html.Google Scholar
  • Friedman R, Anderson C, Brett J, Olekalns M, Goates N, Lisco CC (2004) The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: Evidence from electronically mediated disputes. J. Appl. Psych. 89(2):369–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George JM (1991) State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. J. Appl. Psych. 76(2):299–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goolsbee A, Syverson C (2008) How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1611–1633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Gino F (2010) A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J.Personality Soc. Psych. 98(6):946–955.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhalgh L (1993) Viking Investments. Teaching case, Creative Consensus, Spruce Head, ME.Google Scholar
  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiltrop JM, Rubin JZ (1982) Effects of intervention mode and conflict of interest on dispute resolution. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(4):665–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 6(1):1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koka BR, Prescott JE (2008) Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 29(6):639–661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kopelman S, Rosette AS, Thompson L (2006) The three faces of Eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(1):81–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer L, Perozynski LA, Chung Y-T (1999) Parental responses to sibling conflict: The effects of development and parent gender. Child Development 70(6):1401–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuester S, Homburg C, Robertson TS (1999) Retaliatory behavior to new product entry. J. Marketing 63(4):90–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacefield K (2008) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(7):1063–1065.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lelieveld G-J, Van Dijk E, Van Beest I, Van Kleef GA (2012) Why anger and disappointment affect other’s bargaining behavior differently. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(9):1209–1221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki RJ, Weiss SE, Lewin D (1992) Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. J. Organ. Behav. 13(3):209–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim RG, Carnevale PJ (1990) Contingencies in the mediation of disputes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(2):259–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(1):99–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manstead ASR, Wagner HL, MacDonald CJ (1983) A contrast effect in judgments of own emotional state. Motivation Emotion 7(3):279–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGillicuddy NB, Welton GL, Pruitt DG (1987) Third-party intervention: A field experiment comparing three different models. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(1):104–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLaughlin ME, Carnevale P, Lim RG (1991) Professional mediators’ judgments of mediation tactics: Multidimensional scaling and cluster analyses. J. Appl. Psych. 76(3):465–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 68(3):208–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porath CL, Erez A (2007) Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1181–1197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pruitt DG (1981) Negotiation Behavior (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pruitt DG, Rubin J (1986) Social Conflict: Escalation, Impasse, and Resolution (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Rafaeli A, Sutton RI (1991) Emotional contrast strategies as means of social influence: Lessons from criminal interrogators and bill collectors. Acad. Management J. 34(4):749–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Recchia HE, Howe N (2009) Sibling relationship quality moderates the associations between parental interventions and siblings’ independent conflict strategies and outcomes. J. Family Psych. 23(4):551–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross WH, Wieland C (1996) Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. J. Appl. Psych. 81(3):228–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro DL, Brett JM (1993) Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(6):1167–1177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin JZ, Pruitt DG, Kim SH (1994) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schroth H, Corniola G, Voit M (2006) Miti-Pet case and teaching note. Teaching note, Dispute Resolution Research Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Sherif M (1958) Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. Amer. J. Sociol. 63(4):349–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherif M., Harvey OJ, White BJ, Hood W, Sherif CW (1961) Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment (University Book Exchange, Norman, OK).Google Scholar
  • Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon D (2005) Incumbent pricing responses to entry. Strategic Management J. 26(13):1229–1248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinaceur M, Tiedens LZ (2006) Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(3):314–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spielberger CD, Jacobs G, Russell S, Crane RS (1983) Assessment of anger: The state-trait anger scale. Butcher JN, Spielberger CD, eds. Advances in Personality Assessment Vol. 2 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 159–187.Google Scholar
  • Susskind L, McKearnan S, Thomas-Larmer J (1999) The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Rev. Psych. 33:1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor AB, MacKinnon DP, Tein J-Y (2008) Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organ. Res. Methods 11(2):241–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tenbrunsel AE, Bazerman MH (2001) Moms.com simulation and teaching note. Teaching note, Dispute Resolution Research Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Tng H-Y, Au AKC (2014) Strategic display of anger and happiness in negotiation: The moderating role of perceived authenticity. Negotiation J. 30(3):301–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Ciarocco NJ, Bartels JM (2007) Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(1):56–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA, Côté S (2007) Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1557–1569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2010) Longer-term consequences of anger expression in negotiation: Retaliation or spillover? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(5):753–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR (2004) The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(4):510–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wall JA Jr (1981) Mediation: An analysis, review, and proposed research. J. Conflict Resolution 25(1):157–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinstein N, Ryan RM (2010) When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):222–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiggins JS (1979) A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(3):395–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wildschut T, Bruder M, Robertson S, van Tilburg WAP, Sedikides C (2014) Collective nostalgia: A group-level emotion that confers unique benefits on the group. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(5):844–863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.