When Friends Become Competitors: The Design of Resource Exchange Alliances

References

• Adida E, DeMiguel V (2011) Supply chain competition with multiple manufacturers and retailers. Oper. Res. 59(1):156–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ergun O (2010) Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Oper. Res. 58(6):1726–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Birbil SI, Gürkan G, Listes O (2006) Solving stochastic mathematical programs with complementarity constraints using simulation. Math. Oper. Res. 31(4):739–760.Link, Google Scholar
• Côté JP, Marcotte P, Savard G (2003) A bilevel modeling approach to pricing and fare optimization in the airline industry. J. Revenue Pricing Management 2(1):23–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cottle RW, Pang JS, Stone RE (1992) The Linear Complementarity Problem. Classics in Applied Mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• DeMiguel V, Friedlander MP, Nogales FJ, Scholtes S (2005) A two-sided relaxation scheme for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 16(2):587–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
• Federal Maritime Commission (2006) Hanjin–Evergreen cross slot charter agreement. FMC Agreement No. 011968, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC. http://www2.fmc.gov/agreement_lib/011968-000.pdf.Google Scholar
• Giallombardo G, Ralph D (2008) Multiplier convergence in trust-region methods with application to convergence of decomposition methods for mpecs. Math. Programming 112(2):335–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurkan G, Ozge AY, Robinson SM (1999) Sample-path solution of stochastic variational inequalities. Math. Programming 84(2):313–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrion R, Römisch W (2007) On m-stationary points for a stochastic equilibrium problem under equilibrium constraints in electricity spot market modeling. Appl. Math. 52(6):473–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu X, Caldentey R, Vulcano G (2013) Revenue sharing in airline alliances. Management Sci. 59(5):1177–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Kachani S, Perakis G, Simon C (2008) An MPEC approach to dynamic pricing for perishable products in oligopoly markets. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: Interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45(7):1623–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43(3):513–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawphongpanich S, Hearn DW (2004) An mpec approach to second-best toll pricing. Math. Programming 101(1):33–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin G, Chen X, Fukushima M (2009) Solving stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints via approximation and smoothing implicit programming with penalization. Math. Programming 116(1–2):343–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu HA, Chen SL, Lai P (2010) Slot exchange and purchase planning of short sea services for liner carriers. J. Marine Sci. Technol. 18(5):709–718.Google Scholar
• Lu HA, Cheng J, Lee TS (2006) An evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping—An empirical study of CKYH. J. Marine Sci. Technol. 14(4):202–212.Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Pang J-S, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Midoro R, Pitto A (2000) A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping. Maritime Policy and Management 27(1):31–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21(1):128–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Shumsky RA (2005) Revenue management games: Horizontal and vertical competition. Management Sci. 51(5):813–831.Link, Google Scholar
• Panayides PM, Wiedmer R (2011) Strategic alliances in container liner shipping. Res. Transportation Econom. 32(1):25–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pang JS, Fukushima M (2005) Quasi-variational inequalities, generalized nash equilibria, and multi-leader-follower games. Comput. Manag. Sci. 2(1):21–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patriksson M, Rockafellar RT (2002) A mathematical model and descent algorithm for bilevel traffic management. Transportation Sci. 36(3):271–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Shanbhag UV, Infanger G, Glynn PW (2011) A complementarity framework for forward contracting under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 59(4):810–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A, Xu H (2008) Stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, modeling and sample average approximation. Optimization 57(3):395–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slack B, Comtois C, McCalla R (2002) Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: A global perspective. Maritime Policy Management 29(1):65–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song DW, Panayides PM (2002) A conceptual application of cooperative game theory to liner shipping strategic alliances. Maritime Policy Management 29(3):285–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spengler JJ (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 58(4):347–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su C-L (2007) Analysis on the forward market equilibrium model. Oper. Res. Lett. 35(1):74–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright CP (2014) Decomposing airline alliances: A bid-price approach to revenue management with incomplete information sharing. J. Revenue Pricing Management 13(3):164–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright CP, Groenevelt H, Shumsky RA (2010) Dynamic revenue management in airline alliances. Transportation Sci. 44(1):15–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Ye JJ (2010) Necessary optimality conditions for two-stage stochastic programs with equilibrium constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 20(4):1685–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang D, Liu M, Shi X (2011) Verifying liner shipping alliance’s stability by applying core theory. Res. Transportation Econom. 32(1):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar