Measuring Multichannel Advertising Response

References

• Abhishek KH, Hosanagar K, Fader P (2015) Media exposure through the funnel: A model of6 multistage attribution. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Ataman B, van Heerde HJ, Mela CF (2010) The long-term effect of marketing strategy on brand sales. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):866–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baier M (1996) How to Find and Cultivate Customers Through Direct Marketing (NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, IL).Google Scholar
• Barajas J, Akella R, Flores A, Holtan M (2016) Experimental designs and estimation for online display advertising attribution in marketplaces. Marketing Sci.35(3):465–485.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass F, Bruce N, Majumdar S, Murthi BPS (2007) Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising–sales relationship. Marketing Sci. 26(2):179–195.Link, Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica. 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger BK, Cohen MA, Lai J (2013) Measuring asymmetric persistence and interaction effects of media across platforms. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman D, Gatignon H (2010) Market Response and Marketing Mix Models: Trends and Research Opportunities, Foundations and Trends in Marketing (Now Publishers, Delft, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Braun M, Moe W (2013) Online display advertising: Modeling the effects of multiple creatives and individual impression histories. Marketing Sci. 32(5):753–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Broadbent S (1984) Modeling with ad-stock. J. Market Res. Soc. 26(4):295–312.Google Scholar
• Chib S (1992) Bayes inference in the Tobit censored regression model. J. Econometrics 51(1–2):79–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Bonfrer A, Dhar SS (2008) The effect of competitive advertising interference on sales for packaged goods. J. Marketing Res. 45(2):211–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Dagger TS (2013) Comparing the relative effectiveness of advertising channels: A case study of a multimedia blitz campaign. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):517–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, van Heerde HJ (2015) Delusion in attribution: Caveats in attributing purchases to multimedia exposures. Working paper, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
• Deighton J, Henderson CM, Neslin SA (1994) The effects of advertising on brand switching and repeat purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe MG, Hanssens DM (2000) Time-series models in marketing: Past, present and future. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (17):183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinner IM, Van Heerde HJ, Neslin S (2014) Driving online and offline sales: The cross-channels effects of digital versus traditional advertising. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):527–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong X, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2009) Quantifying the benefits of individual-level targeting in the presence of firm strategic behavior. J. Marketing Res. 46(2):207–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan JA, McAlister L, Sinha S (2011) Reexamining Bayesian-model-comparison evidence of cross-brand pass-through. Marketing Sci. 30(3):550–561.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Manchanda P (2005) An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(2):107–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eastlack JO Jr, Rao AG (1989) Advertising experiments at the Campbell Soup Company. Marketing Sci. 8(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelfand A, Ghosh SK (1998) Model choice: A minimum posterior predictive loss approach. Biometrika 85(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Harvey AC (1991) Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Hoban PR, Bucklin RE (2014) Effects of Internet display advertising in the purchase funnel: Model-based insights from a randomized field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 52(3):375–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Leng M, Liang L (2012) Recent developments in dynamic advertising research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220(3):591–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson GA, Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2016) Location, location, location: Repetition and proximity increases advertising effectiveness. Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
• Jorgenson DW (1966) Rational distributed lags. Econometrica 32(1):135–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanam K, McAteer J, Marek J, Hodges J, Lin L (2015) Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick and mortar retail sales: Insights from multiple large scale field experiments on Google.com. Working paper, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar
• Koyck LM (1954) Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) On the unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM, Reiley DH (2011) Here, there, and everywhere: Correlated online behaviors can lead to overestimates of the effects of advertising. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 157–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Kannan PK (2014) Attributing conversions in a multichannel online marketing environment: An empirical model and a field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 51(1):40–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Anderson HM, Vahid F (2014) Multivariate dynamic Tobit model. Working paper, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
• Little JDC (1979) Aggregate advertising model: The state of the art. Oper. Res. 27(4):629–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Otter T, Allenby GM (2007) Investigating endogeneity bias in marketing. Marketing Sci. 26(5):642–650.Link, Google Scholar
• Lodish LM, Abraham MM, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995a) A summary of fifty-five in-market experimental estimates of the long-term effect of TV advertising. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G133–G140.Link, Google Scholar
• Lodish LM, Abraham M, Kalmenson S, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995b) How T.V. advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V. advertising experiments. J. Marketing Res. 32(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Rossi PE, Chintagunta PK (2004) Response modeling with non-random marketing mix variables. J. Marketing Res. 41(3):467–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Dubé JP, Goh KY, Chintagunta P (2006) The effect of banner advertising on internet purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):98–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald JF, Moffitt RA (1981) The uses of Tobit analysis. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(2):318–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Peters K (2009) A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media synergies. J. Interactive Marketing 23(4):288–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Raman K (2003) Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):375–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Raman K, Winer RS (2005) Planning marketing-mix strategies in presence of interactions. Marketing Sci. 24(1):25–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(114):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedrick JH, Zufryden FS (1991) Evaluating the impact of advertising media plans: A model of consumer purchase dynamics using single-source data. Marketing Sci. 10(2):111–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Raftery AE, Lewis SM (1996) Implementing Markov chain Monte carlo. Gilks WR, Spiegelhalter DJ, Richardson S, eds. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (Chapman and Hall, London), 115–130.Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of IV methods in marketing applications. Marketing Sci. 5(33):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM (2003) Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. 22(3):304–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015a) Advertising spillovers: Field experimental evidence and implications for the advertising sales–response curve. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015b) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS, Zou D, Chintagunta PK (2017) Do targeted discount offers serve as advertising? Evidence from 70 field experiments. Management Sci. 63(8):2688–2705.Link, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R, Tellis GJ, Briesch RA (2011) How well does advertising work? Generalizations from meta-analysis of brand advertising elasticities. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):457–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard N (1994) Partial non-Gaussian state space models. Biometrika 1(81):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shirley K, Small D, Lynch K, Maisto S, Oslin D (2010) Hidden Markov models for alcoholism treatment trial data. Ann. Appl. Statist. 4(1):366–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JO III (2007) Introduction to Digital Filters with Audio Applications (W3K Publishing), http://www.w3k.org/books/.Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ (1998) Advertising and Sales Promotion Strategy (Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ (2004) Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Ambler T (2007) Handbook of Advertising (Sage Publications, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M, Harrison J (1999) Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2005) Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. J. Appl. Econometrics 20(1):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Duan J, Whinston A (2014) Path to purchase: A mutually exciting point process model for online advertising and conversion. Management Sci. 60(6):1392–1412.Link, Google Scholar