Supplier Competition and Cost Improvement

References

• Agrawal N, Nahmias S (1997) Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty. Production Oper. Management 6(3):291–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Nelson RR, ed. The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V, Burnetas AN, Ritchken PH (2007) Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(2):123–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Kök AG (2009) Dynamic cost reduction through process improvement in assembly networks. Management Sci. 55(4):552–567.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Netessine S (2004) Game theoretic applications in supply chain analysis. Simchi-Levi D, Wu D, Shen Z-J, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis, International Series Operations Research & Management Science (Springer, New York), 13–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Gaimon C (2004) Managing knowledge-based resource capabilities under uncertainty. Management Sci. 50(11):1504–1518.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Beil DR, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2014) Split-award auctions for supplier retention. Management Sci. 60(7):1719–1737.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi TY, Krause DR (2006) The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. J. Oper. Management 24:637–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdowns. Sloan Management Rev. (October 15), http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managing-risk-to-avoid-supplychain-breakdown/.Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Sappington DE (2007) Simple cost-sharing contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):419–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Sappington DE (2009) Implementing high-powered contracts to motivate intertemporal effort supply. RAND J. Econom. 40(2):296–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S (1990) Competition for procurement contracts and underinvestment. Internat. Econom. Rev. 31(4):841–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy R (2005) Supply base rationalization. Report, CAPS Research, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W (2007) Auctions within e-sourcing events. Production Oper. Management 16(4):409–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert SM, Cvsa V (2003) Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150(3):617–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Katz ML (2009) Information and the hold-up problem. RAND J. Econom. 40(3):405–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman G, Kahn C (1988) Limited contract enforcement and strategic renegotiation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(3):471–484.Google Scholar
• Kim S-H, Netessine S (2013) Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry. Management Sci. 59(1):189–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Klotz D, Chatterjee K (1995) Dual sourcing in repeated procurement competitions. Management Sci. 41(8):1317–1327.Link, Google Scholar
• Krause DR (1997) Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management 33(1):12–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1986) Using cost observation to regulate firms. J. Political Econom. 94(3):614–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1987) Auctioning incentive contracts. J. Political Econom. 95(5):921–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lau S (2008) Information and bargaining in the hold-up problem. RAND J. Econom. 39(1):266–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis T, Yildirim H (2002) Managing dynamic competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):779–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C (2013) Sourcing for supplier effort and competition: Design of the supply base and pricing mechanism. Management Sci. 59(6):1389–1406.Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Debo L (2009) Second sourcing versus sole sourcing with capacity investment and asymmetric information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):448–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Liker J (2004) The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Liker J, Choi T (2004) Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(12):295–310.Google Scholar
• Maurer A, Dietz F, Lang N (2004) Beyond cost reduction: Reinventing the automotive OEM-supplier interface. BCG Perspect. (March 8), https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/automotive_sourcing_procurement_beyond_cost_reduction_reinventing_automotive_oem_supplier_interface/.Google Scholar
• McCracken J (2005) Ford seeks big savings by overhauling supply system. Wall Street Journal (September 29), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB112795730346455406.Google Scholar
• Michaels D (2006) Airbus opens overhaul by looking at procurement. Wall Street Journal (September 25), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115913884178972557.Google Scholar
• Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson D, Moody PE, Stegner J (2001) The Purchasing Machine (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Piccione M, Tan G (1996) Cost-reducing investment, optimal procurement and implementation by auctions. Internat. Econom. Rev. 37(3):663–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2007a) Implications of breach remedy and renegotiation design for innovation and capacity. Management Sci. 53(12):1859–1871.Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2007b) Implications of renegotiation for optimal contract flexibility and investment. Management Sci. 53(12):1872–1886.Link, Google Scholar
• Riordan MH (1996) Contracting with qualified suppliers. Internat. Econom. Rev. 37(1):115–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson WP (1992) Contractual solutions to the hold-up problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(4):777–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson WP (2003) Simple menus of contracts in cost-based procurement and regulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):919–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sako M (2004) Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: Comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement. Indust. Corporate Change 13(2):281–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitz PW (2002) Simple contracts, renegotiation under asymmetric information, and the hold-up problem. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(1):169–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin H, Tunca TI (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1986) Procurement and renegotiation. J. Political Econom. 94(2):235–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tunca T, Wu Q (2009) Multiple sourcing and procurement process selection with bidding events. Management Sci. 55(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR (2014) Bid-taker power and supply base diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):300–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Gillandy W, Tomlin B (2010) Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):489–510.Link, Google Scholar