Do We Really Need to Change the Decision Maker? Counterintuitive Escalation of Commitment Results in Real Options Contexts

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2475

References

  • Baker H, Dutta S, Saadi S (2011) Corporate finance practices in Canada: Where do we stand? Multinational Finance J. 15(3/4):157–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett ML (2008) An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):606–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biyalogorsky E, Boulding W, Staelin R (2006) Stuck in the past: Why managers persist with new product failures. J. Marketing 70(2):108–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borison A (2005) Real options analysis: Where are the emperor’s clothes? J. Appl. Corporate Finance 17(2):17–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding W, Morgan R, Staelin R (1997) Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. J. Marketing Res. 34(1):164–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bragger JD, Bragger D, Hantula DA, Kirnan J (1998) Hysteresis and uncertainty: The effect of uncertainty on delays to exit decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 74(3):229–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J (1992) The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Acad. Management Rev. 17(1):39–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burson K, Faro D, Rottenstreich Y (2013) Multiple-unit holdings yield attenuated endowment effects. Management Sci. 59(3):545–555.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cortazar G, Schwartz ES, Salinas M (1998) Evaluating environmental investments: A real options approach. Management Sci. 44(8):1059–1070.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denison CA (2009) Real options and escalation of commitment: A behavioral analysis of capital investment decisions. Accounting Rev. 84(1):133–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guler I (2007) An empirical examination of management of real options in the US venture capital industry. Adv. Strategic Management 24:485–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunia BC, Sivanathan N, Galinsky AD (2009) Vicarious entrapment: Your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(6):1238–1244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huchzermeier A, Loch CH (2001) Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Sci. 47(1):85–101.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly TF, Milkman KL (2013) Escalation of commitment. Kessler EH, ed. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 257–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG, Ferrier WJ, Mendelow AL (2004) Real options as engines of choice and heterogeneity. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):86–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molden DC, Hui CM (2011) Promoting de-escalation of commitment: A regulatory-focus perspective on sunk costs. Psych. Sci. 22(1):8–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J. Financial Econom. 5(2):147–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peck J, Shu SB (2009) The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. J. Consumer Res. 36(3):434–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posavac SS, Sanbonmatsu DM, Fazio RH (1997) Considering the best choice: Effects of the salience and accessibility of alternatives on attitude–decision consistency. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(2):253–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz-Hardt S, Thurow-Kröning B, Frey D (2009) Preference-based escalation: A new interpretation for the responsibility effect in escalating commitment and entrapment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):175–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shu SB, Peck J (2011) Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. J. Consumer Psych. 21(4):439–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dyne L, Pierce JL (2004) Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 25(4):439–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zardkoohi A (2004) Do real options lead to escalation of commitment? Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):111–119.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.