Firm Rigidities and the Decline in Growth Opportunities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2478

References

  • Acemoglu D, Cao D (2015) Innovation by entrants and incumbents. J. Econom. Theory 157(May):255–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adam T, Goyal VK (2008) The investment opportunity set and its proxy variables. J. Financial Res. 31(1):41–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Harris C, Howitt P, Vickers J (2001) Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(3):467–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1974) The Limits of Organization (W. W. Norton & Co., New York).Google Scholar
  • Asker J, Ljungqvist A, Farre-Mensa J (2015) Corporate investment and stock market listing: A puzzle? Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):342–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein S (2015) Does going public affect innovation? J. Finance 70(4):1365–1403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billett MT, King T-HD, Mauer DC (2007) Growth opportunities and the choice of leverage, debt maturity, and covenants. J. Finance 62(2):697–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cao JX, Lerner J (2009) The performance of reverse leveraged buyouts. J. Financial Econom. 91(2):139–157.Google Scholar
  • Caves RE (1998) Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. J. Econom. Literature 36(4):1947–1982.Google Scholar
  • Chang X, Dasgupta S, Hilary G (2006) Analyst coverage and financing decisions. J. Finance 61(6):3009–3048.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chemmanur T, He S, Nandy D (2010) The going-public decision and the product market. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(5):1855–1908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coates JC (2000) Takeover defenses in the shadow of the pill: A critique of the scientific evidence. Texas Law Rev. 79(2):271–382.Google Scholar
  • Cooley TF, Quadrini V (2001) Financial markets and firm dynamics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1286–1310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cronqvist H, Fahlenbach R (2009) Large shareholders and corporate policies. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(10):3941–3976.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Custódio C (2014) Mergers and acquisitions accounting and the diversification discount. J. Finance 69(1):219–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L (2006) The irrelevance of the MM dividend irrelevance theorem. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):293–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L, Stulz RM (2006) Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory? J. Financial Econom. 81(2):227–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dechow P, Hutton AP, Sloan RG (1999) An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. J. Accounting Econom. 26(1–3):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denis DJ, Denis DK, Yost K (2002) Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. J. Finance 57(5):1951–1979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dow J, Perotti E (2013) Resistance to change. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Easterbrook F, Fischel D (1999) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Evans DS (1987) The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):567–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. 43(2):153–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, French KR (2001) Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? J. Financial Econom. 60(1):3–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, French KR (2004) New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates. J. Financial Econom. 73(2):229–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreira D, Manso G, Silva AC (2014) Incentives to innovate and the decision to go public or private. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):256–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fink J, Fink KE, Grullon G, Weston JP (2010) What drove the increase in idiosyncratic volatility during the Internet boom? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(5):1253–1278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fogel K, Morck R, Yeung B (2008) Big business stability and economic growth: Is what’s good for General Motors good for America? J. Financial Econom. 89(1):83–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frésard L, Valta P (2016) How does corporate investment respond to increased entry threat. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 5(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giroud X, Mueller HM (2010) Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? J. Financial Econom. 95(3):312–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
  • Grullon G, Michaely R, Swaminathan B (2002) Are dividend changes a sign of firm maturity? J. Bus. 75(3):387–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hadlock CJ, Pierce JR (2010) New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(5):1909–1940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He J, Tian X (2013) The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):856–878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hicks JR (1935) Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of monopoly. Econometrica 3(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoberg G, Phillips G, Prabhala NR (2014) Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. J. Finance 69(1):293–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain BA, Kini O (1994) The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. J. Finance 49(5):1699–1726.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B, MacDonald GM (1994) The life cycle of a competitive industry. J. Political Econom. 102(2):322–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2001) Why wait? A century of life before IPO. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):336–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2014) Extensive and intensive investment over the business cycle. J. Political Econom. 122(4):863–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Henderson R (2005) Organizational rigidity, incentives and technological change: Insights from organizational economics? Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):169–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karpoff JM, Wittry MD (2015) Institutional and political economy considerations in natural experiments: The case of state antitakeover laws. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • Lamont O, Polk C, Saá-Requejo J (2001) Financial constraints and stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(2):529–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loderer C, Waelchli U (2010) Protecting minority shareholders: Listed versus unlisted firms. Financial Management 39(1):33–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loderer C, Waelchli U (2015) Corporate aging and takeover risk. Rev. Finance 19(6):2277–2315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maksimovic V, Phillips G (2008) The industry life cycle, acquisitions and investment: Does firm organization matter? J. Finance 63(2):673–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mikkelson WH, Partch MM, Shah K (1997) Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public. J. Financial Econom. 44(3):281–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller DC (1972) A life cycle theory of the firm. J. Indust. Econom. 20(3):199–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (2002) Evolutionary theorizing in economics. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(2):23–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pagano M, Panetta F, Zingales L (1998) Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. J. Finance 53(1):27–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pástor L, Veronesi P (2003) Stock valuation and learning about profitability. J. Finance 58(5):1749–1789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pástor L, Taylor L, Veronesi P (2009) Entrepreneurial learning, the IPO decision, and the post-IPO drop in firm profitability. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(8):3005–3046.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinganum JF (1985) Innovation and industry evolution. Quart. J. Econom. 100(1):81–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson SA (2006) Over-investment of free cash flow. Rev. Accounting Stud. 11(2):159–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritter J (2015) Founding dates for 10,266 firms going public in the U.S. during 1975–2015 (updated July 2015). https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/2015/08/Founding-dates-for-10266-firms-going-public-in-the-US-during-1975-2015-2015-07.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Schaefer S (1998) The dependence of the pay-performance sensitivity on the size of the firm. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(3):436–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shumway T (2001) Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. J. Bus. 74(1):101–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein JC (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 104(4):655–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein JC (1997) Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. J. Finance 52(1):111–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1963) Capital and Rates of Return in Manufacturing Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yorukoglu M (1998) The information technology productivity paradox. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 1(2):551–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu F (2008) Analyst coverage and earnings management. J. Financial Econom. 88(2):245–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.