Do Stock Options Overcome Managerial Risk Aversion? Evidence from Exercises of Executive Stock Options
Published Online:14 Jul 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2485
References
- (1987) Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. J. Finance 42(4):823–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value. J. Financial Econom. 104(1):70–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. J. Finance 52(4):1411–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Exercise behavior, valuation, and the incentive effects of employee stock options. J. Financial Econom. 76(2):445–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Stock and option grants with performance-based vesting provisions. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3849–3888.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Performance-vesting provisions in executive compensation. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
- (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81(3):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The exercise and valuation of executive stock options. J. Financial Econom. 48(2):127–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite? J. Finance 55(5):2311–2331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The importance of behavioral factors in the exercise and valuation of employee stock options. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
- (2010) CEOs vs. CFOs: Incentives and corporate policies. J. Financial Econom. 97(2):263–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The manipulation of executive stock option exercise strategies: Information timing and backdating. J. Finance 64(6):2627–2663.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Do executive stock options encourage risk-taking? Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):431–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility. J. Accounting Res. 40(3):613–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) The effect of executive stock option plans of stockholders and bondholders. J. Finance 45(2):617–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Out-of-the-money CEOs: Private control premium and option exercises. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(6):1549–1585.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) CEO compensation and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Accounting Econom. 56(2–3):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. J. Financial Econom. 53(1):43–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Stock options for undiversified executives. J. Accounting Econom. 33(1):3–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A theory of board control and size. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1797–1832.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Stock options and managerial incentives for risk taking: Evidence from FAS 123R. J. Financial Econom. 105(1):174–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):601–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The influence of risk diversification on the early exercise of employee stock options by executive officers. J. Accounting Econom. 21(1):45–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Employee stock option exercises: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Econom. 21(1):5–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Risk, ambiguity, and the exercise of employee stock options. Working paper, Baruch College, New York.Google Scholar
- (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Stock option repricing and its alternatives: An empirical examination. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 44(6):1459–1487.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Tournament incentives, firm risk, and corporate policies. J. Financial Econom. 103(2):350–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) How do executives exercise their stock options? Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2002) The volatility and price sensitivities of managerial stock option portfolios and corporate hedging. J. Finance 57(2):801–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Are insider trades informative? Rev. Financial Stud. 14(1):79–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Portfolio considerations in valuing executive compensation. J. Accounting Res. 29(1): 129–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Corporate cash holdings and CEO compensation incentives. J. Financial Econom. 102(1):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. J. Financial Econom. 92(3):470–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 4(1):141–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier Science, North Holland, Amsterdam), 211–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Learning about CEO ability and stock return volatility. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(6):1623–1666.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Stock valuation and learning about profitability. J. Finance 58(5):1749–1789.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. J. Accounting Econom. 33(2):145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Compensation, incentives, and the duality of risk aversion and riskiness. J. Finance 59(1):207–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Swinging for the fences: Executive reactions to quasi-random option grants. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (1985) The determinants of firms’ hedging policies. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 20(4):391–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Who manages risk? An empirical examination of risk management practices in the gold mining industries. J. Finance 51(4):1097–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar

