Moral Hazard in Dynamic Risk Management

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2493

References

  • Bichteler K (1981) Stochastic integration and Lp-theory of semimartingales. Ann. Prob. 9(1):49–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briand P, Hu Y (2008) Quadratic BSDEs with convex generators and unbounded terminal conditions. Prob. Theory Related Fields 141(3–4):543–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cadenillas A, Cvitanić J, Zapatero F (2007) Optimal risk-sharing with effort and project choice. J. Econom. Theory 133:403–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cont R, Fournié D (2013) Functional Itô calculus and stochastic integral representation of martingales. Ann. Probab. 41(1):109–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2015) The dynamic programming approach to principal–agent problems. Working paper, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.Google Scholar
  • Dupire B (2009) Functional Itô calculus. Working paper, Bloomberg L.P., New York.Google Scholar
  • El Karoui N, Peng S, Quenez M-C (1997) Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math. Finance 7(1):1–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein L, Ji S (2013) Ambiguous volatility and asset pricing in continuous time. Rev. Financ. Stud. 26(7):1740–1786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein L, Ji S (2014) Ambiguous volatility, possibility and utility in continuous time. J. Math. Econom. 50:269–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazi-Tani N, Possamaï D, Zhou C (2015) Second-order BSDEs with jumps: formulation and uniqueness. Ann. Appl. Probab. 25(5):2867–2908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung RCW (2014) Continuous-time principal–agent problem with drift and stochastic volatility control: With applications to delegated portfolio management. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  • Lioui A, Poncet P (2013) Optimal benchmarking for active portfolio managers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226(2):268–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kobylanski M (2000) Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth. Ann. Prob. 28(2):558–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neufeld A, Nutz M (2014) Measurability of semimartingale characteristics with respect to the probability law. Stoc. Proc. App. 124(11):3819–3845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nutz M (2012) Pathwise construction of stochastic integrals. Elec. Com. Prob. 17(24):1–7.Google Scholar
  • Nutz M, Soner HM (2012) Superhedging and dynamic risk measures under volatility uncertainty. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50(4):2065–2089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nutz M, van Handel R (2013) Constructing sublinear expectations on path space. Stochastic Processes Appl. 123(8):3100–3121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng S, Song Y, Zhang J (2014) A complete representation theorem for G-martingales. Stochastics 86(4):609–631.Google Scholar
  • Possamaï D, Royer G, Touzi N (2013) On the robust super hedging of measurable claims. Electronic Comm. Prob. 18(95):1–13.Google Scholar
  • Possamaï D, Tan X, Zhou C (2015) Stochastic control for a class of non-linear kernels and applications. Working paper, University Paris-Dauphine, Paris.Google Scholar
  • Ou-Yang H (2003) Optimal contracts in a continuous-time delegated portfolio management problem. Rev. Financial Stud. 16(1):173–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sannikov Y (2008) A continuous-time version of the principal–agent problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):957–984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soner HM, Touzi N, Zhang J (2011) Quasi-sure stochastic analysis through aggregation. Electronic J. Probab. 16(67):1844–1879.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soner HM, Touzi N, Zhang J (2012) Wellposedness of second-order backward SDEs. Prob. Th. Rel. Fields 153(1–2):149–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soner HM, Touzi N, Zhang J (2013) Dual formulation of second order target problems. Ann. Appl. Probab. 23(1):308–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sung J (1995) Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in con-tinuous-time principal–agent problems. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):720–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sung J (2014) Optimal contracts and managerial overconfidence, under ambiguity. Working paper, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea.Google Scholar
  • Wong T-Y (2013) Dynamic agency and exogenous risk taking. Working paper, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.