Waiting To Give: Stated and Revealed Preferences

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2504

References

  • Aitchison J, Silvey SD (1957) The generalization of probit analysis to the case of multiple responses. Biometrika 44(1–2):131–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1447–1458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):293–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J, Brown E, Rischall I (2003) Charitable giving by married couples who decides and why does it matter? J. Human Resources 38(1):111–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Loewenstein G (2006) The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. J. Behavioral Decision Making 19(2):87–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. 75(299):493–517.Google Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cairns J, Slonim R (2011) Substitution effects across charitable donations. Econom. Lett. 111(2):173–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Miller DL (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Human Resources 50(2):317–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data, Vol. 53 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conlin M, Lynn M, O’Donoghue T (2003) The norm of restaurant tipping. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 52(3):297–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox JC, Deck CA (2006) When are women more generous than men? Econom. Inquiry 44(4):587–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47:448–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2013) The importance of being marginal: Gender differences in generosity. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. 103(3):586–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dube-Rioux L, Schmitt BH, Leclerc F (1989) Consumers’ reactions to waiting: When delays affect the perception of service quality. Adv. Consumer Res. 16(1):59–63.Google Scholar
  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Subsidizing charitable contributions: A natural field experiment comparing matching and rebate subsidies. Experiment. Econom. 11(3):234–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erev I, Roth AE (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):848–881.Google Scholar
  • Fehr E, Falk A (2002) Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4):687–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Levine DK (2014) Recency, consistent learning, and nash equilibrium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(Supplement no. 3):10826–10829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Funk P (2010) Social incentives and voter turnout: Evidence from the Swiss mail ballot system. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(5):1077–1103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glasman LR, Albarracín D (2006) Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psych. Bull. 132(5):778–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn SA, Williams AE, Nass CC, Bethel J, Kessler D, Scott EP, Fridey J, Kleinman SH, Schreiber GB (2003) Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: Implications for donor recruitment. Transfusion 43(1):7–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspectives 25(4):191–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goette L, Stutzer A, Yavuzcan G, Frey BM (2009) Free cholesterol testing as a motivation device in blood donations: Evidence from field experiments. Transfusion 49(3):524–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gross D (2005) Zero-sum charity: Does tsunami relief dry up other giving? Slate Magazine (January 20), http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2005/01/zerosum_charity.html.Google Scholar
  • Hui MK, Tse DK (1996) What to tell consumers in waits of different lengths: An integrative model of service evaluation. J. Marketing 60(2):81–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krueger AB (2009) A hidden cost of health care: Patient time. New York Times (February 9), http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/a-hidden-cost-of-health-care-patient-time/?_r=0.Google Scholar
  • Lacetera N, Macis M (2010) Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(2):225–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2013) Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science 340(6135):927–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2014) Rewarding volunteers: A field experiment. Management Sci. 60:1107–1129.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster T (1992) The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data, Vol. 17 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Loewenstein G (2000) Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):426–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey RD, Zavoina W (1975) A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J. Math. Sociol. 4(1):103–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meier S (2007) Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1203–1222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M (2016) Gender. Kagel J, Roth AE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Peterson RA, Wilson WR (1992) Measuring customer satisfaction: Fact and artifact. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 20(1):61–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sayette MA, Loewenstein G, Griffin KM, Black JJ (2008) Exploring the cold-to-hot empathy gap in smokers. Psych. Sci. 19(9):926–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz B (1974) Waiting, exchange, and power: The distribution of time in social systems. Amer. J. Sociol. 79(4):841–870.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheeran P (2002) Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 12(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slonim R, Wang C, Garbarino E (2014) The market for blood. J. Econom. Perspectives 28(2):177–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S (1994) Waiting for service: The relationship between delays and evaluations of service. J. Marketing 58(2):56–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S, Fullerton G (2000) Waiting for Service: Perceptions Management of the Wait Experience (Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA), 171–189.Google Scholar
  • Vaillant GE (1977) Adaptation to Life (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.