Debtor Rights, Credit Supply, and Innovation

References

• Abramowitz M (1956) Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. Amer. Econom. Rev. 46:5–23.Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D (2008) Introduction to Modern Economic Growth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Acharya V, Subramanian K (2009) Bankruptcy codes and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(12):4949–4988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acs Z, Audretsch D (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4):678–690.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Hsu D (2013) Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Sci. 60(4):867–887.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Tirole J (1994) The management of innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):1185–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alston LJ (1984) Farm foreclosure moratorium legislation: A lesson from the past. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(3):445–457.Google Scholar
• Amore M, Schneider C, Zaldokas A (2013) Credit supply and corporate innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109 (3):835–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2015) Independent boards and innovation. Working paper, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Berkovitz T (2010) Innovation in business groups. Management Sci. 56(3):519–535.Link, Google Scholar
• Benfratello L, Schiantarelli F, Sembenelli A (2008) Banks and innovation: Microeconometric evidence on Italian firms. J. Financial Econom. 90(2):197–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger A, Cerqueiro G, Penas M (2011) Does debtor protection really protect debtors? Evidence from the small business credit market. J. Banking and Finance 35(7):1843–1857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz J, White M (2004) Bankruptcy and small firms’ access to credit. RAND J. Econom. 35(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black S, Strahan P (2002) Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. J. Finance 57(6):2807–2833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerqueiro G, Penas F (2016) How does personal bankruptcy law affect start-ups? Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Chava S, Oettl A, Subramanian A, Subramanian K (2013) Banking deregulation and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):759–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why firms patent or not? NBER Working paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornaggia J, Mao Y, Tian X, Wolfe B (2015) Does banking competition affect innovation? J. Financial Econom. 115(1):189–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, McLiesh C, Shleifer A (2007) Private credit in 129 countries. J. Financial Econom. 85(2):299–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2011) Incentives for innovation: Bankruptcy, corporate governance, and compensation systems. Litan RE, ed. Handbook of Law, Innovation, and Growth (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 90–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein D, Hamilton B, Zenger T (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4):659–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Evans DS, Leighton LS (1989) Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(3):519–535.Google Scholar
• Fan W, White M (2003) Personal bankruptcy and the level of entrepreneurial activity. J. Law Econom. 46(2):543–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farre-Mensa J, Ljungqvist A (2013) Do measures of financial constraints measure financial constraints? NBER Working paper 19551, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Panico C, Valentini G (2013) Strategic incentives to human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(1):37–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham S, Hegde D (2015) Disclosing patents’ secrets. Science 347(6219):236–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Grim C, Islam T, Marco AC, Miranda J (2015) Business dynamics of innovating firms: Linking U.S. patents with administrative data on workers and firms. Paper CES-WP-15-19, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28(4):1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Gropp R, Scholz J, White M (1997) Personal bankruptcy and credit supply and demand. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):217–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Tratjenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer F, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(3):511–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. NBER Technical working paper 17, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F, Ljungqvist A (2013) As certain as debt and taxes: Estimating the tax sensitivity of leverage from exogenous state tax changes. NBER Working paper 18263, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hochberg Y, Serrano C, Ziedonis R (2014) Patent collateral, investor commitment and the market for venture lending. NBER Working paper 20587, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hvide H, Møen J (2010) Lean and hungry or fat and content? Entrepreneurs’ wealth and start-up performance. Management Sci. 56(8):1242–1258.Link, Google Scholar
• Hynes R, Malani A, Posner E (2004) The political economy of property exemption laws. J. Law Econom. 47(1):19–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyytinen A, Toivanen O (2005) Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth?: Evidence on the role of public policy. Res. Policy 34(9):1385–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr W, Nanda R (2009) Democratizing entry: Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 94(1):124–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King R, Levine R (1993) Finance, entrepreneurship, and growth. J. Monetary Econom. 32:513–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Lerner J (2000) Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):674–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landier A (2006) Entrepreneurship and the stigma of failure. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University.Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2009) Boulevard of Broken Dreams (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann W (2015) Creditor rights and innovation: Evidence from patent collateral. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Nicholas T (2014) Did bank distress stifle innovation during the Great Depression? J. Financial Econom. 114(2):273–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2012) Innovation and the financial guillotine. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2013) Investment cycles and start-up innovation. J. Financial Econom. 110(2):403–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paik Y (2013) The bankruptcy reform act of 2005 and entrepreneurial activity. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(2):259–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pence KM (2006) Foreclosing on opportunity: State laws and mortgage credit. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(1):177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IPL (2017) Law and innovation: Evidence from state trade secrets laws. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(1):167–179 .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan R, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):559–586.Google Scholar
• Robb A, Robinson D (2014) The capital structure decisions of new firms. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):153–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robb A, Seamans R (2014) The role of R&D in entrepreneurial finance. Adv. Strategic Management (Special Issue Finance Strategy) 31:341–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technical change. J. Political Econom. 98(5):S71–S102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samilla S, Sorenson O (2011) Non-compete covenants: Incentives to innovate or impediments to growth. Management Sci. 57(3):425–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Scott JA, Smith TC (1986) The effect of the bankruptcy reform act of 1978 on small business loan pricing. J. Financial Econom. 16(1):119–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane SA (2008) The Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths That Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live By (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Solow R (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econom. Statist. 39(3):312–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Economist (2010) A better bust? Bankruptcy is becoming less calamitous. (June 26), http://www.economist.com/node/16397136.Google Scholar
• Tian X, Wang T (2014) Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):211–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1989) The welfare analysis of product innovations, with an application to computed tomography scanners. J. Political Econom. 97(2):444–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Jaffe A, Henderson R (1997) University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR (1994) Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Sci. 40(6):708–729.Link, Google Scholar