Selling Out: The Inauthenticity Discount in the Craft Beer Industry

References

• Alström T (2014) How to review a beer. Beer Advocate (December 23), http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/how-to-review-a-beer.241156/.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics, An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baugh B (1988) Authenticity revisited. J. Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46(4):477–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beverland MB (2005) Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1003–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1985) The market of symbolic goods. Poetics 14(1–2):13–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewers Association (2015) Craft brewer defined. Accessed September 1, https://www.brewersassociation.org/statistics/craft-brewer-defined/.Google Scholar
• Bulik BS (2009) What your taste in beer says about you. Advertising Age (November 2), http://adage.com/article/news/psychographics-taste-beer/140106/.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the U.S. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esterl M, Mickle T (2014) Beer giants cultivate their crafty side. Wall Street Journal (December 28), http://www.wsj.com/articles/beer-giants-cultivate-their-crafty-side-1419806627.Google Scholar
• Fine GA (2003) Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self-taught art. Theory Soc. 32(2):153–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner BB, Levy SJ (1955) The product and the brand. Harvard Bus. Rev. 33(2):33–40.Google Scholar
• Gilmore J, Pine J (2009) Using art to render authenticity in business. Report, Arts & Business, London. http://www.artsandbusinessni.org.uk/documents/2012-05-16-11-59-29-42-aandb_be_usingarttorenderauthenticity.pdf.Google Scholar
• Glazer A, Konrad KA (1996) A signaling explanation for charity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):1019–1028.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazian D (2005) Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Urban Blues Clubs (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Grubb EL, Grathwohl HL (1967) Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. J. Marketing 31(4):22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O (2016) Turning back the clock in baseball: The increased prominence of extrinsic rewards and demand for authenticity. Organ. Sci. 27(4):929–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW, Kim M (2015) Why authenticity is in demand: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Negro G, Rao H, De Leung M (2007) No Barrique, no Berlusconi: Collective identity, contention, and authenticity in the making of Barolo and Barbaresco wines. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB (1982) Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J. Marketing 46(3):92–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan J, Boyden C (2015) A merger won’t solve big beer’s craft problem. Bloomberg (October 7), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-07/ab-inbev-s-merger-plans-still-leave-big-beer-vulnerable-to-craft.Google Scholar
• Kim H (2016) Identity shock: The cost of mainstream publicity among avant-garde knitters. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity how awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carroll GR, Lehman DW (2013) Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain. Organ. Sci. 25(2):458–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, Kovács B, Carroll GR (2014) Conflicting social codes and organizations: Hygiene and authenticity in consumer evaluations of restaurants. Management Sci. 60(10):2602–2617.Link, Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Quart. J. Econom. 64(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard D (2012) The plot to destroy America’s beer. Bloomberg (October 26), http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2012-10-25/the-plot-to-destroy-americas-beer.Google Scholar
• Leonard D (2015) Can craft beersurvive AB InBev? Bloomberg (June 25), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2015-06-25/can-craft-beer-survive-ab-inbev-.Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy SJ (1959) Symbols for sale. Harvard Bus. Rev. 37(July–August):117–119.Google Scholar
• Lewis S (2014) We Make Beer: Inside the Spirit and Artistry of America’s Craft Brewers (St. Martin’s Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Malter D (2014) On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status evidence from the grands crus classés of the médoc. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):271–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason RS (1981) Conspicuous Consumption: A Study of Exceptional Consumer Behaviour (St. Martin’s Press, New York).Google Scholar
• McAuley J, Leskovec J, Jurafsky D (2012) Learning attitudes and attributes from online reviews. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.Google Scholar
• McKendrick DG, Hannan MT (2014) Oppositional identities and resource partitioning: Distillery ownership in Scotch whisky, 1826–2009. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1272–1286.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Leung MD (2013) “Actual” and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian winemaking. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.Link, Google Scholar
• Ody-Brasier A, Vermeulen F (2014) The price you pay price-setting as a response to norm violations in the market for champagne grapes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):109–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson RA (1997) Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson RA (2005) In search of authenticity. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1083–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E (2012) Two sides of the same coin how ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red a study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “Red Scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M (1979) Conceiving the Self (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Rossman G, Schilke O (2014) Close, but no cigar the bimodal rewards to prize-seeking. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):86–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruddick G (2015) Beer titans opt to merge as trend for smaller craft brews comes to a head. The Guardian (October 17), http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/oct/17/sabmiller-ab-inbev-megabrew-craft-beer-ale-pubs.Google Scholar
• Schneider P (2012) The honk heard round the world: Goose Island one year after the sale. Chicagoist (April 16), http://chicagoist.com/2012/04/16/the_honk_heard_round_the_world_goos.php.Google Scholar
• Schultz EJ (2013) A-B InBev proves a good home for Goose Island as big brewer helps cult craft rise. Advertising Age (December 16), http://adage.com/article/news/years-a-b-inbev-good-goose-island/245676/.Google Scholar
• Sexton SE, Sexton AL (2014) Conspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. J. Environment. Econom. Management 67(3):303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Sirgy MJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trilling L (1972) Sincerity and Authenticity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Khessina OM, Dobrev SD (2015) Oppositional product names, organizational identities, and product appeal. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1466–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu L (2015) What the do-it-yourself craft beer pod machine may mean to the Canadian consumer. Forbes (October 31), http://www.forbes.com/sites/lesliewu/2015/10/31/what-the-do-it-yourself-craft-beer-pod-machine-may-mean-to-the-canadian-consumer/.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2012) Construction, concentration, and (dis)continuities in social valuations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY (2003) The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 12(1):27–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY, Ukanwa K, von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar