The Sources of the Communication Gap

References

• Balliet D (2009) Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analytic review. J. Conflict Resolution 54(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belot M, Bhaskar V, Van de Ven J (2010) Promises and cooperation: Evidence from a TV game show. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 73(3):396–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belot M, Bhaskar V, Van de Ven J (2012) Can observers predict trustworthiness? Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(1):246–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C, Lev-On A (2007) Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: An experimental analysis. Politics, Philosophy Econom. 6(2):139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C, Lev-on A, Chavez A (2010) The medium or the message? Communication relevance and richness in trust games. Synthese 176(1):125–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanco M, Engelmann D, Koch AK, Normann HT (2014) Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: A within-subjects analysis. Games Econom. Behav. 87(September):122–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Frey BS (1999) The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(1):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouas KS, Komorita SS (1996) Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(11):1144–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Ellman M, Charness G (2016) Let’s talk: How communication affects contract design. J. European Econom. Assoc. 14(4):943–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brosig J (2002) Identifying cooperative behavior: Some experimental results in a prisoner’s dilemma game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 47(3):275–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brosig J, Weimann J, Ockenfels A (2003) The effect of communication media on cooperation. German Econom. Rev. 4(2):217–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Mui VL (2015) Rich communication, social motivations, and coordinated resistance against divide-and-conquer: A laboratory investigation. Eur. J. Political Econom. 37(March):146–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2010) Bare promises: An experiment. Econom. Lett. 107(2):281–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2011) Participation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1211–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Houser D (2017) Promises and lies: Can observers detect deception in written messages. Experiment. Econom. 20(2):396–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman L, Niehaus P (2014) Pathways of Persuasion. Mimeo, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
• Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes MA, Huck S, Weizsäcker G (2014) Beliefs and actions in the trust game: Creating instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect. Games Econom. Behav. 88(November):298–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darai D, Grätz S (2010) Determinants of successful cooperation in a face-to-face social dilemma. SOI Working Paper 1006, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Darai D, Grätz S (2013) Attraction and cooperative behavior. Working Paper 82, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Dawes RM, McTavish J, Shaklee H (1977) Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Haan T, Offerman T, Sloof R (2015) Money talks? An experimental investigation of cheap talk and burned money. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(4):1385–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman P (2008) Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Petrie R (2011) Face value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1497–1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekman P (2009) Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage, Revised ed. (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2004a) Is there a hold-up problem? Scandinavian J. Econom. 106(3):475–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2004b) Promises, threats and fairness. Econom. J. 114(495):397–420.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes Insight (2009) Business meetings: The case for face-to-face. Report, Forbes Insights, New York, http://www.forbes.com/forbesinsights/Business_Meetings_FaceToFace/.Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Gilovich T, Regan DT (1993a) Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? J. Econom. Perspect. 7(2):159–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Gilovich T, Regan DT (1993b) The evolution of one-shot cooperation: An experiment. Ethology and Sociobiology 14(4):247–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg AE, Smeets P, Zhurakhovska L (2014) Promoting truthful communication through ex-post disclosure. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Griesinger DW, Livingston JW (1973) Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Sci. 18(3):173–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
• Hugh-Jones D, Reinstein D (2012) Anonymous rituals. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(2):478–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ismayilov H, Potters J (2014) Promises as commitments. Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, Kaufman-Gilliland CM (1994) Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemma. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(3):513–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebrand WB (1984) The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 14(3):239–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miettinen T, Suetens S (2008) Communication and guilt in a prisoner’s dilemma. J. Conflict Resolution 52(6):945–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulford M, Jackson J, Svedsäter H (2008) Encouraging cooperation: Revisiting solidarity and commitment effects in prisoner’s dilemma games. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 38(12):2964–2989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offerman T, Sonnemans J, Schram A (1996) Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods. Econom. J. 106(437):817–845.Google Scholar
• Sally D (1995) Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality Soc. 7(1):58–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlag KH, Tremewan J, Van der Weele JJ (2014) A penny for your thoughts: A survey of methods for eliciting beliefs. Experiment. Econom. 18(3):457–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76(6):1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Assem MJ, Van Dolder D, Thaler RH (2012) Split or steal? Cooperative behavior when the stakes are large. Management Sci. 58(1):2–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen B, Noussair CN, Offerman TJS, Suetens S, Van Veelen M, Van de Ven J (2014) Predictably angry: Facial cues provide a credible signal of destructive behavior. Working paper, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar