The Probit Choice Model Under Sequential Search with an Application to Online Retailing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2545

References

  • Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2009) Estimating demand heterogeneity using aggregated data: An application to the frozen pizza category. Marketing Sci. 28(2):356–372.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, Renault R (1999) Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):719–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Fox JT, Ryan SP (2007) Linear regression estimation of discrete choice models with nonparametric distributions of random coefficients. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):459–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (2004) Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market. J. Political Econom. 112(1):68–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF (1987) Competition and collusion in the American automobile industry: The 1955 price war. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):457–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Kim JB, Mela CF (2016) Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online? Marketing Sci. 35(5):693–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2016) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2557.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Draganska M, Klapper D (2011) Choice set heterogeneity and the role of advertising: An analysis with micro and macro data. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):653–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An Introduction to the Bootstrap (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg B (2009) Top 10 online retailers by conversion rate: August 2009. Accessed September 18, 2016, http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-august-2009/.Google Scholar
  • Elrod T (1988) Choice map: Inferring a product-market map from panel data. Marketing Sci. 7(1):21–40.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T (1996) A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. 15(4):359–378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2013) Surviving social media overload: Predicting consumer footprints on product search engines. Working paper, University of New York, New York.Google Scholar
  • Goeree MS (2008) Limited information and advertising in the US personal computer industry. Econometrica 76(5):1017–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G, Rysman M (2012) Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1173–1219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hancox P (2008) Is Amazon’s 9.6% conversion rate low? Here’s why I think so…. (February 3), http://www.conversionblogger.com/is-amazons-96-conversion-rate-low-heres-why-i-think-so/.Google Scholar
  • Hofilena J (2014) Sony to cut more jobs at failing electronic equipment division. Japan Daily Press (January 3), http://japandailypress.com/sony-to-cut-more-jobs-at-failing-electronic-equipment-division-0341844/.Google Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Chintagunta PK (2017) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the U.S. auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura WA, Russell GJ (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. 26(4):379–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koulayev S (2014) Search for differentiated products: Identification and estimation. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):553–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magid L (2007) Today’s HDTV, or next year’s? New York Times (December 20), http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/technology/personaltech/20basics.html.Google Scholar
  • McFadden D (1989) A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica 57(5):995–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moraga-González JL, Sándor Z, Wildenbeest MR (2015) Consumer search and prices in the automobile market. Working paper, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin AK (2002) Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. 110(4):705–729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonnier GP, McAlister L, Rutz OJ (2011) A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Marketing Sci. 30(4):702–716.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Train K (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Heerde HJ, Mela CF, Manchanda P (2004) The dynamic effect of innovation on market structure. J. Marketing Res. 41(2):166–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker Sands (2014) Reinventing retail: What businesses need to know for 2014. White paper, Walker Sands, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.