A Bayesian Methodology for Systemic Risk Assessment in Financial Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2546

References

  • Amini H, Cont R, Minca A (2016) Resilience to contagion in financial networks. Math. Finance 26(2):329–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand K (2015) The missing links—A global study on uncovering financial network structure from partial data. Presentation slides, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. http://www.risk.jbs.cam.ac.uk/news/events/other/2015/150909_financialriskandnetworktheory.html.Google Scholar
  • Anand K, Craig B, Von Peter G (2014) Filling in the blanks: Network structure and interbank contagion. Quant. Finance 15(4):625–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Awiszus K, Weber S (2015) The joint impact of bankruptcy costs, fire sales and cross-holdings on systemic risk in financial networks. Working paper, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany. http://www.stochastik.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/institut/pdf/JointImpactPaper.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Bank of England (2015) The Bank of England’s approach to stress testing the UK banking system. Report, Bank of England, London. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/financialstability/Documents/stresstesting/2015/approach.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Barvinok A (2012) Matrices with prescribed row and column sums. Linear Algebra Appl. 436(4):820–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biagini F, Fouque J-P, Frittelli M, Meyer-Brandis T (2015) A unified approach to systemic risk measures via acceptance sets. Preprint arXiv:1503.06354. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06354.Google Scholar
  • Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M, Thurner S (2004) Network topology of the interbank market. Quant. Finance 4(6):677–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brualdi RA (2006) Combinatorial Matrix Classes, Vol. 13 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caldarelli G, Capocci A, De Los Rios P, Muñoz MA (2002) Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. Physical Rev. Lett. 89(25):258702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Iyengar G, Moallemi CC (2013) An axiomatic approach to systemic risk. Management Sci. 59(6):1373–1388.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen N, Liu X, Yao DD (2016) An optimization view of financial systemic risk modeling: The network effect and the market liquidity effect. Oper. Res. 64(5):1089–1108.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cifuentes R, Ferrucci G, Shin HS (2005) Liquidity risk and contagion. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(2/3):556–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cormen TT, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL (1990) Introduction to Algorithms (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Craig B, Von Peter G (2014) Interbank tiering and money center banks. J. Financial Intermediation 23(3):322–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Degryse H, Nguyen G (2007) Interbank exposures: An empirical examination of contagion risk in the Belgian banking system. Internat. J. Central Banking 3(June):123–171.Google Scholar
  • Diaconis P, Sturmfels B (1998) Algebraic algorithms for sampling from conditional distributions. Ann. Statist. 26(1):363–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg L, Noe TH (2001) Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Sci. 47(2):236–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elsinger H, Lehar A, Summer M (2006) Using market information for banking system risk assessment. Internat. J. Central Banking 2(1):137–165.Google Scholar
  • Elsinger H, Lehar A, Summer M (2013) Network models and systemic risk assessment. Fouque J-P, Langsam JA, eds. Handbook on Systemic Risk, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 287–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs I. Publicationes Mathematicae 6(1):290–297.Google Scholar
  • Feinstein Z, Rudloff B, Weber S (2015) Measures of systemic risk. Preprint arXiv:1502.07961. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07961.Google Scholar
  • Feldmann A, Whitt W (1997) Fitting mixtures of exponentials to long-tail distributions to analyze network performance models. Proc. 16th Annual Joint Conf. IEEE Comput. Comm. Soc., Vol. 3 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1096–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Financial Stability Board and International Monetary Fund (2015) The financial crisis and information gaps—Sixth progress report on the implementation of the G-20 Data Gaps Initiative. Report, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. http://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/2015/6thprogressrep.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Glasserman P, Young HP (2015) How likely is contagion in financial networks? J. Banking Finance 50(January):383–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hałaj G, Kok C (2013) Assessing interbank contagion using simulated networks. ECB Working Paper 1506, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Haldane A (2015) On microscopes and telescopes. Speech, Lorentz Centre Workshop on Socio-Economic Complexity, March 25, Leiden, The Netherlands. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/2015/812.aspx.Google Scholar
  • Harris CM (1968) The Pareto distribution as a queue service discipline. Oper. Res. 16(2):307–313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hurd TR (2016) Contagion! Systemic Risk in Financial Networks (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kromer E, Overbeck L, Zilch K (2016) Systemic risk measures on general measurable spaces. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 84:323–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langfield S, Liu Z, Ota T (2014) Mapping the UK interbank system. J. Banking Finance 45:288–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mastromatteo I, Zarinelli E, Marsili M (2012) Reconstruction of financial networks for robust estimation of systemic risk. J. Statist. Mechanics: Theory Experiment 2012(March):P03011.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller JW, Harrison MT (2013) Exact sampling and counting for fixed-margin matrices. Ann. Statist. 41(3):1569–1592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mistrulli PE (2011) Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market: Maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns. J. Banking Finance 35(5):1114–1127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moussa A (2011) Contagion and systemic risk in financial networks. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Musmeci N, Battiston S, Caldarelli G, Puliga M, Gabrielli A (2013) Bootstrapping topological properties and systemic risk of complex networks using the fitness model. J. Statist. Phys. 151(3):720–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nier E, Yang J, Yorulmazer T, Alentorn A (2007) Network models and financial stability. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 31(6):2033–2060.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6(1):7–11.Google Scholar
  • Robert C, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers LCG, Veraart LAM (2013) Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Sci. 59(4):882–898.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ryser HJ (1960) Matrices of zeros and ones. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 66(6):442–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Servedio VDP, Caldarelli G, Buttà P (2004) Vertex intrinsic fitness: How to produce arbitrary scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. E 70(5):056126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snijders TA (1991) Enumeration and simulation methods for 0–1 matrices with given marginals. Psychometrika 56(3):397–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Temurshoev U, Miller RE, Bouwmeester MC (2013) A note on the GRAS method. Econom. Systems Res. 25(3):361–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Upper C (2011) Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. J. Financial Stability 7(3):111–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Upper C, Worms A (2004) Estimating bilateral exposures in the German interbank market: Is there a danger of contagion? Eur. Econom. Rev. 48(4):827–849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wells SJ (2004) Financial interlinkages in the United Kingdom’s interbank market and the risk of contagion. Working Paper 230, Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
  • Woeginger GJ, Yu Z (1992) On the equal-subset-sum problem. Inform. Processing Lett. 42(6):299–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaman A, Simberloff D (2002) Random binary matrices in biogeographical ecology—Instituting a good neighbor policy. Environment. Ecological Statist. 9(4):405–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.