The Value of Nothing: Asymmetric Attention to Opportunity Costs Drives Intertemporal Decision Making

References

• Ainslie G (1975) Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psych. Bull. 82(4):463–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1991) Procrastination and obedience. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):1–19.Google Scholar
• Anderson NH (1974) Information integration theory: A brief survey. Krantz DH, Atkinson RC, Luce RD, Suppes P, eds. Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2 (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco), 236–305.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels DM, Urminsky O (2015) To know and to care: How awareness and valuation of the future jointly shape consumer spending. J. Consumer Res. 41(6):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateman I, Dent S, Peters E, Slovic P, Starmer C (2007) The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. J. Behavioral Decision Making 20(4):365–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146(4):447–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billings RS, Scherer LL (1988) The effects of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 41(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Böhm-Bawerk EV (1890) Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory. Accessed September 2, 2014, http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbCI.html. [William A. Smart, trans. Library of Economics and Liberty.]Google Scholar
• Chabris CF, Laibson D, Morris CL, Schuldt JP, Taubinsky D (2008) Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. J. Risk Uncertainty 37:237–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman GB (1996) Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):59–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman GB (2000) Preferences for improving and declining sequences of health outcomes. J. Behavioral Decision Making 13(2):203–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Rai D, Heath TB (2016) Tradeoff between time and money: The asymmetric consideration of opportunity costs. J. Bus. Res. 69(7):2560–2566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cubitt R, Starmer C, Sugden R (1998) On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experiment. Econom. 1:115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle JR (2013) Survey of time preference, delay discounting models. Judgment and Decision Making 8(2):116–135.Google Scholar
• Fisher I (1930) The Theory of Interest (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Franco-Watkins AM, Pashler H, Rickard TC (2006) Does working memory load lead to greater impulsivity? Commentary on Hinson, Jameson, and Whitney (2003). J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 32(2):443–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franco-Watkins AM, Rickard TC, Pashler H (2010) Taxing executive processes does not necessarily increase impulsive decision making. Experiment. Psych. 57(3):193–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G (2008) Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences. J. Risk Uncertainty 37:221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40:351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Novemsky N, Wang J, Dhar R, Nowlis S (2009) Opportunity cost neglect. J. Consumer Res. 36(4):553–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigliotti B, Sopher B (1997) Violations of present-value maximization in income choice. Theory and Decision 43(1):45–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glimcher PW, Kable JW, Louie K (2007) Neuroeconomic studies of impulsivity: Now or just as soon as possible? Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):142–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg AE, Spiller SA (2016) Opportunity cost neglect attenuates the effect of choices on preferences. Psych. Sci. 27(1): 103–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyse JL, Keller LR, Eppel T (2002) Valuing environmental outcomes: Preferences for constant or improving sequences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(2):253–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Weber EU (2009) Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 138(3): 329–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Appelt KC, Weber EU (2013) Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. J. Behavioral Decision Making 26(4):348–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Orlove B, Krantz DH, Small A, Milch K, Osgood DE (2012) About time: An integrative approach to effective environmental policy. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 22(3):684–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JPA, Munafò MR, Fusar-Poli P, Nosek BA, David SP (2014) Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: Detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends Cognitive Sci. 18(5):235–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2012) Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psych. Sci. 23(5):524–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kable JW, Glimcher PW (2010) An “as soon as possible” effect in human intertemporal decision making: Behavioral evidence and neural mechanisms. J. Neurophysiology 103(5):2513–2531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, McConnell M, Mullainathan S, Zinman J (2016) Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving. Management Sci. 62(12):3393–3411.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 128(1):78–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1988) Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Sci. 34(2):200–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1991) Negative time preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):347–352.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1993) Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psych. Rev. 100(1):91–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Sicherman N (1991) Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles? J. Labor Econom. 9(1):67–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo S, Ainslie G, Giragosian L, Monterosso JR (2011) Striatal hyposensitivity to delayed rewards among cigarette smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 116(1–3):18–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magen E, Dweck CS, Gross JJ (2008) The Hidden zero effect: Representing a single choice as an extended sequence reduces impulsive choice. Psych. Sci. 19(7):648–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magen E, Kim B, Dweck CS, Gross JJ, McClure SM (2014) Behavioral and neural correlates of increased self-control in the absence of increased willpower. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(27): 9786–9791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariotti M, Mittone M (2010) Choosing monetary sequences: Theory and experimental evidence. Theory and Decision 69(3):327–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Ok EA (2007) A theory of (relative) discounting. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):214–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson J, Baumann AA, Green L (2014) Discounting of delayed rewards: (A)theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire. Behavioural Processes 107:99–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nenkov GY, Inman JJ, Hulland J (2008) Considering the future: The conceptualization and measurement of elaboration on potential outcomes. J. Consumer Res. 35(1):126–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noguchi T, Stewart N, Olivola CY, Moat HS, Preis T (2014) Characterizing the time-perspective of nations with search engine query data. PLoS-ONE 9(4):e95209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olivola CY, Wang SW (2016) Patience auctions: The impact of time vs. money bidding on elicited discount rates. Experiment. Econom. 19(4):864–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preis T, Moat HS, Stanley HE, Bishop SR (2012) Quantifying the advantage of looking forward. Sci. Rep. 2:Article 350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronin E, Olivola CY, Kennedy KA (2008) Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(2):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radu PT, Yi R, Bickel WK, Gross JJ, McClure SM (2011) A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 96(3):363–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D (2001) Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertainty 23(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D (2004) Intertemporal choice. Koehler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 424–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Powell M (2002) Reasons for sequence preferences. J. Behavioral Decision Making 15(5):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Scholten M (2012) Tradeoffs between sequences: Weighing accumulated outcomes against outcome-adjusted delays. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 38(6):1675–1689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Airoldi M (2012) Four days later in Cincinnati: Longitudinal tests of hyperbolic discounting. Acta Psychologica 140(2):177–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Scholten M (2013) DRIFT: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 39(2):573–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reimers S (2009) A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation. Judgment and Decision Making 4(6):461–466.Google Scholar
• Reimers S, Maylor EA, Stewart N, Chater N (2009) Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income, education and real-world impulsive behavior. Personality Individual Differences 47(8):973–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2013) Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making 8(5):540–551.Google Scholar
• Sayman S, Öncüler A (2009) An investigation of time inconsistency. Management Sci. 55(3):470–482.Link, Google Scholar
• Scholten M, Read D (2006) Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Sci. 52(9): 1424–1436.Link, Google Scholar
• Scholten M, Read D, Sanborn A (2014) Weighing outcomes by time or against time? Evaluation rules in intertemporal choice. Cognitive Sci. 38(3):399–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir E, Thaler RH (2006) Invest now, drink later, spend never: On the mental accounting of delayed consumption. J. Econom. Psych. 27(5):694–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D, Ainslie G, Frederick S, Li X, Lynch J, Moreau P, Mitchell Aet al. (2005) The psychology of intertemporal discounting: Why are distant events valued differently from proximal ones? Marketing Lett. 16(3–4):347–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiller SA (2011) Opportunity cost consideration. J. Consumer Res. 38(4):595–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS (1994) The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(4):742–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. 8(3):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save More Tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(S1):S164–S187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torres A, Catena A, Megías A, Maldonado A, Cándido A, Verdejo-García A, Perales JC (2013) Emotional and non-emotional pathways to impulsive behavior and addiction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troutman CM, Shanteau J (1976) Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information? J. Consumer Res. 3(2):101–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urminsky O, Zauberman G (2014) The psychology of intertemporal preferences. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Wu C-Y, He G-B (2012) The effects of time perspective and salience of possible monetary losses on intertemporal choice. Soc. Behav. Personality 40(10):1645–1654.Crossref, Google Scholar