Sequential Search with Refinement: Model and Application with Click-Stream Data

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2557

References

  • Adam K (2001) Learning while searching for the best alternative. J. Econom. Theory 101(1):252–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2):131–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2016) Too much information? Information provision and search costs. Marketing Sci. 35(4):605–618.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bughin J, Corb L, Manyika J, Nottebohm O, Chui M, de Muller Barbat B, Said R (2011) The impact of Internet technologies: Search. Report, McKinsey & Company, New York.Google Scholar
  • Chan TY, Park Y-H (2015) Consumer search activities and the value of ad positions in sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 34(4):606–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Los Santos BI, Hortacsu A, Wildenbees MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Los Santos B, Hortacsu A, Wildenbeest MR (2017) Search with learning for differentiated products: Evidence from e-commerce. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 35(4):626–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellison G, Ellison SF (2009) Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. Econometrica 77(2):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowd-sourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2014) Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Management Sci. 60(7):1632–1654.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong H, Shum M (2006) Using price distributions to estimate search costs. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):257–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the U.S. auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Chintagunta P (2017) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the U.S. auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hortacsu A, Syverson C (2004) Product differentiation, search costs, and competition in the mutual fund industry: A case study of S&P 500 index funds. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):403–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ke TT, Shen Z-JM, Villas-Boas JM (2016) Search for information on multiple products. Management Sci. 62(12):3576–3603.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2017) The probit choice model under sequential search with an application to online retailing. Management Sci. 63(11):3911–3929.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koulayev S (2013) Search with dirichlet priors: Estimation and implications for consumer demand. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 31(2):226–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koulayev S (2014) Search for differentiated products: Identification and estimation. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):553–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D (2004) Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. 23(4):490–499.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McDevitt RC (2014) “A” business by any other name: Firm name choice as a signal of firm quality. J. Political Econom. 122(4):909–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moe WW (2006) An empirical two-stage choice model with varying decision rules applied to internet clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):680–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moraga-Gonzalez JL, Sandor Z, Wildenbeest MR (2015) Consumer search and prices in the automobile market. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinna F, Seiler S (2015) Consumer search: Evidence from path-tracking data. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
  • Seiler S (2013) The impact of search costs on consumer behavior: A dynamic approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(2):155–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi S, Trusov M (2013) The path to click: Are you on it? Working paper, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar
  • Sorensen AT (2000) Equilibrium price dispersion in retail markets for prescription drugs. J. Political Econom. 108(4):833–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2016) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effects of rankings on online consumer search and choice. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao S, Mela CF (2008) Online auction demand. Marketing Sci. 27(5):861–885.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yao S, Mela CF (2011) A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 30(3):447–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yoganarasimhan H (2013) The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Sci. 32(6):860–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.